Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Planck's Constant Revealed for the First Time

page: 5
6
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 02:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Tetryonix
 

Just the math would do it. Can you reduce it to a set of equations?
edit on 29-1-2013 by moebius because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by moebius
 


Sure:

H = 12*[1/c^2]*[E*1^2] + 36*[1/c^2]*[E*25^2]
fro rest mass- Energy Hydrogen atoms
edit on 29-1-2013 by Tetryonics because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 03:40 PM
link   
reply to post by moebius
 


The first eqn was for the mass obviously, here is the eqn for the mass-Energy-Matter:

H = [12pi/c^4]*[E*1^2] + [36pi/c^4]*[E*25^2]
for rest mass-Energy-Matter content of Hydrogen atoms
edit on 29-1-2013 by Tetryonics because: (no reason given)
edit on 29-1-2013 by Tetryonics because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 06:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tetryonix
reply to post by SplitInfinity
 


Tetryonics has strict definitions of Energy in all its forms [EM mass, standing wave Matter, black-body radiation, kinetic energies etc]. This distinction between energy's waveforms allows for the precise definition and determination of the quanta in any physical system under measurement.


The type of arrived at definitions for Quanta as you state is provided from observation of a physical system is not possible.

Just tha act of observation will change what those definitions would have been. Quanta are also not limited in their existence to any one or even more physical states in one single Universal reality and it seems likely that Quantum Particle/Wave Forms may be in a constant state of exchange between all other versions that exist in each of the infinite Divergent Universal States that would exist in a Multiverse.

Split Infinity



posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by SplitInfinity
 


The type of geometric definitions for Quanta is indeed possible.

What you are relying on with 'indeterminacy' and Heisenberg's Uncertainty 'principle' is just an explanation developed to let mathematicians 'off the hook' a century ago when it come to explaining the statistical, probabilistic outcomes of QM, its interactions and observed phenomena.

Indeed the act of measuring will change a system's energy level but with the right geometry you can model the rest mass-Matter of any system and account for the energies of black body radiation, interaction and kinetic energies etc.

A quantum of Planck energy is an 'ideal' inductive loop of Energy whose geometry gives us the physical characteristics of Electric permittivity and Magnetic permeability along with its mass-Energy momenta relationships. [these are all derived from the geometry of Energy itself - the math is just a language developed by us to describe these physical characteristics and processes in an attempt to discern the underlying mechanisms at work.

Euler's formula is in fact just a mathematical expression for the geometric phase relationships of charge in EM waves, hence its being described as ' transcendental' [but the math won't show you why that that is - its been around 260 yrs now - equilateral geometry is the key]

Don't have to believe me, but please check it out your yourself by reading the eBooks with an open mind, apply your understanding of math and I guarantee you'll see the connections. I recommend T[5] - geometrics for yourself - it relates equilateral geometry to the math of Physics - from there you can build up a new understanding of the the equilateral, deterministic nature of QM,QED, Chemistry and Cosmology.

ABRAHAM





new topics

top topics
 
6
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join