posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 05:17 PM
Its a fair question, honestly, but I think it really comes down to conditions with which the president came in (and maybe a few other factors.
Like it or not, Bush came into office in a fairly decent position. While Im not a huge fan of Clinton, the facts are, he left things in pretty decent
shape, at least for the short term. Bush didnt take long at all to dig some pretty deep holes.
Obama came into office with a giant cluster f*&^# to do with, on multiple fronts, so people give him a little more leeway to try and clean up the
*Note-This is not to say I agree with Obama's actions throughout his presidency. In fact, I have a LOT of issues with what he has done and while I
voted for his first term, I did not vote for him this time around. (Sad, isnt it, that I have to add a note at the end of the post to qualify
edit on 23-1-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)