It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InTheLight
reply to post by Logarock
Again, they have already proved themselves and hence the military ban removed.
Originally posted by InTheLight
reply to post by Logarock
Again, they have already proved themselves and hence the military ban removed.
Actually, no women have ever proven themselves in combat arms...
Originally posted by yourmaker
How would this effect women and the ability to get drafted? Has anyone thought about that aspect?
Would they draft women for the frontline if a major war broke out this time around?
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Actually, no women have ever proven themselves in combat arms...
One cannot prove without being given the opportunity to do so.
**EDITED: since you thought I was playing word games with you. This is more fitting for your post.edit on 24-1-2013 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by InTheLight
reply to post by Logarock
Again, they have already proved themselves and hence the military ban removed.
Despite a Congressional policy that bans women from participating in direct ground combat, the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have blurred the frontlines, thrusting servicewomen fully into combat roles. Additionally, commanders have rapidly realized the benefit of using servicewomen in missions that require close interaction with local Iraqi and Afghan populations. Both the Army and Marine Corps have evolved their use of women on the battlefield through the use of ad hoc Female Engagement Teams (FETs) and Lioness Teams, which are often tasked to work with combat arms units. Additionally, women are used daily in missions that entail high risk of direct fire, such as convoys with high exposure to Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs).
Over 250,000 women have served thus far in Iraq and Afghanistan (11% of the total troops deployed there). Women are fighting with distinction, earning some of the military’s highest awards, including the Silver Star. Countless women return home with invisible wounds, like PTSD and major depression, and related conditions like substance abuse, homelessness, and suicide. Women are more likely to suffer from Military Sexual Trauma (MST), compounding their risk of mental illness. Despite the changing roles of women in combat, many women still struggle to receive the same military awards and veterans’ benefits as their male peers. Congressional policy on banning women from direct ground combat must change in order to recognize women’s actual accomplishments on the battlefield.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by InTheLight
reply to post by Logarock
Again, they have already proved themselves and hence the military ban removed.
Interesting. Please point out the incidents where females humped 120lbs of personal gear, LBE, protective devices, ammo, food, in adition to another 40+ pounds of unit materiel such as ammo for the MG or a motar baseplate into a combat zone and then engaged the enemy.
Sure, females have engaged the enemy on a few occasions, but those events are a bit different than the tasks required of a frontline grunt. One of our MP's on convoy watch needed a male to charge her M2 because she lacked the upper body strength to pull the bolt back on her own. It went down in one fight because she had a jam and everybody else was too busy to climb up on top of the truck and rack the bolt for her.
I've seen many pelvic stress fractures from forced marches and humps because the broader pelvic structure makes them more susceptible to fractures, especially under a load. Like it or not, the fact is that females are built differently and some tasks are not appropriate to them.edit on 24-1-2013 by NavyDoc because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Actually, no women have ever proven themselves in combat arms...
One cannot prove without being given the opportunity to do so.
**EDITED: since you thought I was playing word games with you. This is more fitting for your post.edit on 24-1-2013 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by InTheLight
reply to post by LennayTheUndead
But it is what I am talking about.
Originally posted by InTheLight
This female combat medic's pack looks the same as the men's packs, or even larger.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by InTheLight
This female combat medic's pack looks the same as the men's packs, or even larger.
www.youtube.com...