It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sleeper
Computers and cars have evolved on their own specifically to make people's lives easier...yeah, same reasoning as Darwinism.
Humans have evolved cars, computers, those flying machines started by the Wright brothers, microwave ovens, hybrid plants, skyscrapers and toilet paper using the human brain.
There is "always" some form of intelligence behind evolution, whether it is pond scum, animals, insects, human brains or machines, somebody/something intelligent has its finger in the mix and designs the outcome.
The idea of everything happening by "chance" is absurd.
My opinion is that Darwin and Religion are way off the mark when it comes to what is going on in this "intelligently" run universe.
Originally posted by sleeper
There is "always" some form of intelligence behind evolution,
Originally posted by Nevertheless
That can't be right as the reasoning behind Darwinism is not that it makes things easier for anyone.
Nor do computers and cars develop on their own.
There is "always" some form of intelligence behind evolution, whether it is pond scum, animals, insects, human brains or machines, somebody/something intelligent has its finger in the mix and designs the outcome.
That is just a statement.
If you throw Darwinism into the well, it would be interesting to hear you point out why it doesn't work, instead of claiming the involvement of something intelligent.
The idea of everything happening by "chance" is absurd.
Actually, it's less "by chance" than Darwin could have imagined. There are examples on earth that show how some things are more likely to evolve into something specific than others.
Also, how is natural selection "chance"?
My opinion is that Darwin and Religion are way off the mark when it comes to what is going on in this "intelligently" run universe.
Could you please back up your "opinion" rather than stating that Darwinism is "absurd".
Also, it is interesting that you dismiss religion as well, which is quite difficult to dismiss as it's a claim that can't really be proven unless God suddenly decides so. And.. what is this intelligent design that you are talking about, but that most definitely is not God?
But I'd rather you explaining why darwinism "doesn't work", even though it seemingly does.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by sleeper
There is "always" some form of intelligence behind evolution,
Can you please list every case of evolutionthat has ever occured, the intelligence behind it, and the evidence for that link.
Thanks.
Originally posted by sleeper
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by sleeper
There is "always" some form of intelligence behind evolution,
Can you please list every case of evolutionthat has ever occured, the intelligence behind it, and the evidence for that link.
Thanks.
That was a figure of speech,
I don't believe in evolution, I believe everything was created for a reason, not by chance, natural selection or by one god.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by sleeper
I don't believe in evolution, I believe everything was created for a reason, not by chance, natural selection or by one god.
Well that is as weird as heck - usually anti-evolutionists do believe it is all god's fault.
However Lenski's experiment proves that your lack of belief in natural selection as an evolutionary process is wrong, and your confusion is irrelevant.
Originally posted by RiverRunsFree
Some interesting theories here, thanks.
I think I can show evolution in a nutshell.........
Originally posted by sleeper
Originally posted by Nevertheless
That can't be right as the reasoning behind Darwinism is not that it makes things easier for anyone.
Nor do computers and cars develop on their own.
It makes things easier for the creature that was upgraded that's the whole reasoning behind Darwinism.
Computers and cars don't "happen" they are made created by "intelligent design" humans, if you will.
That is just a statement.
If you throw Darwinism into the well, it would be interesting to hear you point out why it doesn't work, instead of claiming the involvement of something intelligent.
That is just a statement, as is saying that Darwinism is the reason for things happening out of the blue. Pixy dust makes more sense and is more believable in my book.
I have yet to see anything that has evolved
, I have seen similar animals with different body parts or variations. Which means they are intrinsically different, a cousin or like a sibling.
There is no proof that anything changed except for those that want there to be proof
We humans tend to see what we wish to see, or believe.
There are literally millions of variations of creatures on this planet. Some lived millions of years ago and some similar ones exist today. It don't mean that they are the same creature or plant.
We could say that apes saw how their human cousins turned out and decided not to evolved further or stopped evolving and remained apes, now that I might believe.
The universe is huge and has been going on forever, figuratively speaking, there are endless possibilities amongst those billions of stars and planets, certainly humans are nowhere near the top of the food chain concerning intelligence.
It's my opinion that everything was created by higher beings. Which is more believable an idea for me than believing things created themselves by mere chance or natural selection, which to me is the same thing.
Originally posted by sleeper
[Evolution remains a scientific theory and a theory is not a fact it's only an idea, a guess, a theory.
- United States Natinal Academy of Science
The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics)...One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed.
Originally posted by Nevertheless
No it doesn't. In many cases it leads to instant death of individuals with "upgrades".
In other cases, it leads to the death of complete speices thanks to the wrong "choice".
Again, that is natural selection.
No, it is not just a statement. Science shows so. That is what differs the theory of evolution to your statement.
So again, please explain how science is wrong in this. That's what science is for, there are no random statements.
I have yet to see anything that has evolved
I have seen similar animals with different body parts or variations. Which means they are intrinsically different, a cousin or like a sibling.
Does your cousins and siblings have different body parts or variations?
Also, I don't really understand what exactly are you expecting to see?
Also, think about the ridiculous things we have managed to do with wolves in only ~10.000 years, because we've actually been able to control the process. A gray wolf turned into dogs of all colors, shapes and sizes that look nothing like wolves.
First of all, we didn't evolve from apes.
Second, neither we or apes have stopped evolving.
Third, we cannot consciously evolve to any direction unless we agree on a breeding program.
Incidentally though, there is a little bit of truth that mammals (and others) have something of a breeding program "built-in", as it's a successful thing.
This is of course pure speculation, but yes, there could certainly be more "intelligent" beings out there.
I don't know however what humans or human intelligence has to do with this topic?
But this is still only a random statement which will be interesting only after you have explained what is wrong with darwinism.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by sleeper
[Evolution remains a scientific theory and a theory is not a fact it's only an idea, a guess, a theory.
A Scientific Theory is a technical term which differs from common English useage, which you have given above.
In Science a "theory" is NOT "an idea, a guess" - it is the 2nd highest level of Scientific knowledge if you like, "exceeded" only by a "law".
- United States Natinal Academy of Science
The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics)...One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed.
"It's jsut a theory" is a demonstration of willful ignorance, because the definition of a scientific theory as above is well known and ther is no excuse for thinking otherwise.edit on 24-1-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Nicely ignoring that you were just plain wrong about what a scientific theory is!!
Evolution is a sceintific fact - drug resistant strains of various diseases are a fact, not "just a theory".
And natural selection as a mechanism for evolution is also a fact - as demonstrated by Lenski's experiment.
you choosing to ignore them does not stop them from being facts.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by sleeper
so you are saying drug resistant strains have actually been delibverately created? got any evidence for that?
Being able to use other drugs or techniques to fight drug resistant strains is not relevant to the FACT that the drug resistant strains EVOLVED in the first place, hence evolution existsedit on 24-1-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sleeper
Rather than a wrong choice, what might have happened was that the animal became obsolete and it died off, or more likely killed off...removed from service similar to removing a dangerous fish from a fish tank to spare the other fish...by the intelligent or not so much, owner of the fish tank, that mistakenly put a dangerous fish in his/her fish tank.
No, it is not just a statement. Science shows so. That is what differs the theory of evolution to your statement.
So again, please explain how science is wrong in this. That's what science is for, there are no random statements.
Science searches for clues to fit a certain model and avoids at all costs "random" contradictions...sometimes by sweeping them under the rug...when encountered.
The process is painfully slow, so it's difficult to see in action.
However, you are in a bit of luck:
Easily digested evolution in action
The url didn't work.
Have you seen my cousins? ('') Anyway, intelligent humans have tampered with wolves and turned them into a bunch of weird dogs...That's my point, someone or thing intervened in the process, as is true with all natural selection happenings, in my opinion.
I agree that we didn't evolve from apes...I don't believe we evolved and are still evolving. Have you seen the elections lately?
Pure speculation true, as is everything.
Everything is wrong with Darwinism, even Darwin remained unconvinced and he became so confused that he ended up choosing religion over science on his death bed.
There is no such thing as chance, coincidence, or evolution. Everything happens for a reason or it doesn't happen at all.
Originally posted by Nevertheless
It is completely true that Darwin remained unconvinced, and that for a reason.
Like Einstein, he did not have the means to prove or even show that all of his claims actually were true. Science eventually did.