Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Did Jesus Carry The Mark Of The Beast?

page: 1
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 11:26 AM
link   
Question: Did Jesus carry the mark of the beast..?

History says - yes!

According to history, and the Bible, the life of Jesus is well documented.
His life is documented from birth until the age of twelve which he then
mysteriously disappears.
He then reappears when he is 30 until his is put to death at the age of thirty three.

We are missing eighteen years in the life of Jesus between the age of twelve and thirty.

Between twelve and thirty the number left to consult is eighteen.
Eighteen devided by three equals the number six three times..
...or as we know it - the infamous 666.

Is the Bible revealing to us Jesus was a mere mortal..?




posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 11:42 AM
link   
reply to post by HumAnnunaki
 


As far as I understand according to the bible, the mark of the beast is a physical mark placed on the forehead or hand, not a numerology trick.
And yes, he was mortal. He died, didn't he?



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 11:44 AM
link   
You can make the number 666 out of any combination of variables if you reach far enough. And that's exactly what it is - reaching. OP is reaching. Sure, it's just speculation, but we may as well recognize the nature of such speculation right off the bat.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by HumAnnunaki
 


Beyond the bible there is NO historical documentaion of the man named jesus found in the bible.

this entire thread is deluded from the get go, but dont let the lack of proof or evidence ruin your delusions.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 11:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Wertdagf
 


No historical evidence of Jesus of Nazareth outside of the Bible?



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 11:55 AM
link   
The beast inside is and has always been the selfish ego created by separation from all that is and dualistic point of view. Some people can tame it and some can even learn to not care at all what it wants anymore.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 11:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by HumAnnunaki
 


Beyond the bible there is NO historical documentaion of the man named jesus found in the bible.

this entire thread is deluded from the get go, but dont let the lack of proof or evidence ruin your delusions.


Um...this is not the Bible at all...



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:03 PM
link   
reply to post by HumAnnunaki
 


NO, I don't think they had RFID chips back then
. I'm agnostic so I don't really pay attention to those things but I have read the bible a couple of times, it's a good story, what can I say? Anyhoo. I never thought of that. Why is it missing a big chunk of his life? His marriage to Mary Magdalene maybe? The bible has been reworked so many time who knows why they omitted it.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:11 PM
link   
reply to post by abeverage
 


Yeah right.... just dont do any research on how flawed that Antiquities of the Jews is as a historical document.

Wouldnt want to pop that flimsy littlte bubble of yours. O wait, i cant.... this all plays into your delusions..

edit on 23-1-2013 by Wertdagf because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by abeverage
 


Please don’t view this as an attack on your religion because it is not. However, is that the only extrabiblical reference to Jesus? I would really think an individual of that historical significance would feature in a multitude of external sources.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by HumAnnunaki
 


Beyond the bible there is NO historical documentaion of the man named jesus found in the bible.

this entire thread is deluded from the get go, but dont let the lack of proof or evidence ruin your delusions.


You're wrong.
Just because you haven't seen any doesn't make your opinions fact.
Thalus, Julius Africanus, Seutonius... Just a few of the people who wrote about him.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:20 PM
link   
@ Trollz -
Yes it is a physical mark but it is determined by the number 666.

@ AfterInfinty -
I am not "reaching" - the Bible is full of hidden meanings.
Sorry that you haven't been given "eyes for which to see".

@ LittleByLittle -
Excellent remark; I employ your direct intelligence.


@XLR8R -
This isn't about the RFI chip. It is about what the Bible dictates as the number of man.

@ Abeverage -
Thank you for the link; off to investigate it now.


@ Wertdagf -
Why the antagonism? Why the need to be so disdainful

Your view is your view - why do it in such a disgruntled tone..?
Help me to understand please.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by HumAnnunaki
@ Wertdagf -
Why the antagonism? Why the need to be so disdainful

Your view is your view - why do it in such a disgruntled tone..?
Help me to understand please.


Because that's what they do here. Didn't you get the memo?

Actually that's one of the main reasons I very rarely post here.

m



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Revelation 13:16-18

Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.

Looks plain and simple to me.
Mark of the beast is a literal mark on the hand or forehead.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by GmoS719
Revelation 13:16-18
This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.


Thank you for that - I speak of the number denoted
and why the Bible allowed an 18 year stretch of disappearance.

Jesus returned at age 30 until death at 33.
33 minus 30 equals 3.
18 dived by 3 equals the sum of three six's.

Clearly the Bible marks Jesus with 666.
edit on 23-1-2013 by HumAnnunaki because: spelling correction



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by AfterInfinity
You can make the number 666 out of any combination of variables if you reach far enough. And that's exactly what it is - reaching. OP is reaching. Sure, it's just speculation, but we may as well recognize the nature of such speculation right off the bat.


I also think the idea of Jesus having the mark is ridiculous and you can find this sequence in just about anything if you tried hard enough. Take this for example: my birthday is April 25, 1963. If I write that as 4/25/1963 we can add the 4 and 2 to get 6. Then the 5 and the 1 to get six. Subtract the 3 from the 9 and get 6 and we're left with an extra 6 just for good measure



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by HumAnnunaki

Originally posted by GmoS719
Revelation 13:16-18
This calls for wisdom: let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.


Thank you for that - I speak of the number denoted
and why the Bible allowed an 18 year stretch of disappearance.

Jesus returned at age 30 until death at 33.
33 minus 30 equals 3.
18 dived by 3 equals the sum of three six's.

Clearly the Bible marks Jesus with 666.
edit on 23-1-2013 by HumAnnunaki because: spelling correction


You can't say clearly.
Clearly means it's obvious. Nothing about that is obvious.
Also the bible never gives the age of Jesus.
33 is just a guess.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:39 PM
link   
reply to post by ratcals
 


Unfortunately Ratcals - you miss the significance in which the Bible operates.
It is a very coded instrument.
Those whom choose to dig deep into it's hidden dogma
(instead of following blind religious scholars)
will learn the hidden meanings.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by GmoS719
You can't say clearly.
Clearly means it's obvious. Nothing about that is obvious.
Also the bible never gives the age of Jesus.
33 is just a guess.


As others have contended - there is no solid proof
to the life of Jesus and from what you are saying
(correct me if I'm wrong)
What the Bible quotes as the life of Jesus is "just a guess."



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by HumAnnunaki

Originally posted by GmoS719
You can't say clearly.
Clearly means it's obvious. Nothing about that is obvious.
Also the bible never gives the age of Jesus.
33 is just a guess.


As others have contended - there is no solid proof
to the life of Jesus and from what you are saying
(correct me if I'm wrong)
What the Bible quotes as the life of Jesus is "just a guess."


I never said the life of Jesus was a guess. His age is a guess.
Show me this quote you speak of. It doesn't exist.
The bible doesn't give a year of birth. How else can you determine his age at death? Besides guessing.





new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join