Did Jesus Carry The Mark Of The Beast?, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 11:42 AM by trollz
reply to post by HumAnnunaki



As far as I understand according to the bible, the mark of the beast is a physical mark placed on the forehead or hand, not a numerology trick.
And yes, he was mortal. He died, didn't he?


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 11:49 AM by Wertdagf
reply to post by HumAnnunaki



Beyond the bible there is NO historical documentaion of the man named jesus found in the bible.

this entire thread is deluded from the get go, but dont let the lack of proof or evidence ruin your delusions.


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 11:54 AM by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Wertdagf



No historical evidence of Jesus of Nazareth outside of the Bible?


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 11:58 AM by abeverage
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to
post by HumAnnunaki



Beyond the bible there is NO historical documentaion of the man named jesus found in the bible.

this entire thread is deluded from the get go, but dont let the lack of proof or evidence ruin your delusions.


Um...this is not the Bible at all...


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 12:03 PM by XLR8R
reply to post by HumAnnunaki



NO, I don't think they had RFID chips back then . I'm agnostic so I don't really pay attention to those things but I have read the bible a couple of times, it's a good story, what can I say? Anyhoo. I never thought of that. Why is it missing a big chunk of his life? His marriage to Mary Magdalene maybe? The bible has been reworked so many time who knows why they omitted it.


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 12:11 PM by Wertdagf
reply to post by abeverage



Yeah right.... just dont do any research on how flawed that Antiquities of the Jews is as a historical document.

Wouldnt want to pop that flimsy littlte bubble of yours. O wait, i cant.... this all plays into your delusions..

edit on 23-1-2013 by Wertdagf because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 12:18 PM by ratcals
reply to post by abeverage



Please don’t view this as an attack on your religion because it is not. However, is that the only extrabiblical reference to Jesus? I would really think an individual of that historical significance would feature in a multitude of external sources.


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 12:20 PM by GmoS719
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to
post by HumAnnunaki



Beyond the bible there is NO historical documentaion of the man named jesus found in the bible.

this entire thread is deluded from the get go, but dont let the lack of proof or evidence ruin your delusions.


You're wrong.
Just because you haven't seen any doesn't make your opinions fact.
Thalus, Julius Africanus, Seutonius... Just a few of the people who wrote about him.


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 12:39 PM by HumAnnunaki
reply to post by ratcals



Unfortunately Ratcals - you miss the significance in which the Bible operates.
It is a very coded instrument.
Those whom choose to dig deep into it's hidden dogma
(instead of following blind religious scholars)
will learn the hidden meanings.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Testament Fairy Tales
  Posted 7 days ago with 25 member flags
A Brief Rant On Religion
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Obama has declared himself the messiah?
  Posted 3 days ago with 13 member flags