It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SOUTH Australia is sitting on oil potentially worth more than $20 trillion, independent reports claim - enough to turn Australia into a self-sufficient fuel producer.
Brisbane company Linc Energy yesterday released two reports, based on drilling and seismic exploration, estimating the amount of oil in the as yet untapped Arckaringa Basin surrounding Coober Pedy ranging from 3.5 billion to 233 billion barrels of oil.
"If the Arckaringa (basin) plays out the way we hope it will, and the way our independent reports have shown, it's one of the key prospective territories in the world at the moment."
This has the potential to turn Australia from an oil importer to an oil exporter.
Originally posted by DaRAGE
I swear that 10 years from now the battery technology in cars is going to be so good that you will be able to drive 1000 Km's on one 10 minute or less recharge.
Originally posted by DaRAGE
I swear that 10 years from now the battery technology in cars is going to be so good that you will be able to drive 1000 Km's on one 10 minute or less recharge.
And whilst i'd love Australia to have an extra $20 Trillion up our sleeves, I just think our government works to corporations... I have no hope.
Remember years ago we sold Japan 1 cent per litre of Natural Gas for a contract period of 30 years?
WE have a lot of potential oil and gas sites in this country. Most of it gets exported at super cheap prices whilst we import the stuff we use in our cars at outrageous prices and pay through the nose at the pump.
To be honest. I'd rather keep all those billion of barrels underground, and not up in the air. I'd rather us rely on new battery tech and recharge from the grid. If anything make the oil be kept for future plastic production.edit on 23-1-2013 by DaRAGE because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Mr Tranny
I know you probably made that comment in jest, but lets look at those specifications technically.
An electric car usually uses up to 400WH per km.
A battery that can run up to 1000km could probably store 400KWH of energy.
To charge a 400KWH battery in 10 minutes would take an electrical flow of 2400KW
Or 2.4MW.
2.4MW at 480V 3phase would be about 2900 Amps.
You got any idea how big a three wire 3000 Amp charging pig tail would be?
Or how big the charging connecter would be?
Let me just say this, you better have some help to hook the car up, when you go to the fill up station.
Originally posted by Long Lance
two stars for this fantasy, shameful.
are you aware of the magnitude of improvement would be needed to do that? if you want us to bet the farm on this err, 'projection' then i'd love to see you chipping in, because i wouldn't want to be the sucker who has to hike when it doesn't materialise.
Carbon Nanotube Electrode Lithium Massachusetts Institute of Technology Using layers of carbon nanotubes—strong microscopic hollow threads with relatively large area—scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are developing a cathode (the electrode through which electrons flow out of a battery) that can store and release many more positive ions than a conventional lithium battery. The idea is that this new cathode could increase the amount of power stored in an electric car battery and increase the electricity flow by as much as ten times compared to current products. The development of these new battery cathodes could also enhance solid-state capacitors, or give rise to a combination battery/capacitor that could store and supply much more electricity than either device alone can today. The nanotubes used in a 2010 MIT demonstration are commercially available, but because of testing and development time, potentially marketable battery/capacitor electrodes are at least five years away. Combined with a typical new car development timetable of five years, it could be a decade before we see these hybrid battery/capacitors on a production EV.
Lithium Air Carbon IBM Companies investing in future battery design could be positioned for a lucrative windfall—if their tech becomes the silver bullet for EVs. IBM is now one of those competing companies. Its goal is to increase the range of a battery-powered car range to 500 miles. That would allow owners to drive from Los Angeles to Phoenix on one charge—and still have enough juice left over to cruise around town for a day or so. To do it, the company is developing a lithium-air battery with the potential for far more energy density than current lithium-ion batteries. IBM says its battery can last much longer during a charge because it uses carbon electrodes in which the ions react with oxygen (think of it as a breathing battery), yet that oxygen doesn't deplete the electrolyte medium. IBM is keeping mum about its new technology that keeps oxygen at bay, but says it was developed at the molecular level. The battery technology, however, is not expected to be commercially available to electric car makers until 2020.
Lithium Silicon Northwestern University Harold H. Kung at the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern is researching a way to use silicon electrodes rather than carbon ones, hoping to build a battery with more storage capacity and thus more range. Kung says that by developing more flexible electrodes to accommodate silicon's tendency to expand and contract as it absorbs and discharges ions, a lithium battery could hold many times more ions. And such a battery would be able to move those ions faster—fast enough to reduce charging times on an EV.
Carbon Foam Capacitor Hybrid Michigan Technological University Scientists at Michigan Tech have been working on a power-storage device to combine the electrical-storage density of a chemical battery with the power-delivery efficiency of a solid-state capacitor. One impressive feature: a unique carbon foam used as a cathode to increase the storage capacity. Using a carbon anode, the hybrid battery/capacitor not only weighs less than a conventional lithium battery, but it also delivers more of its charge than a typical capacitor. The unit can be recharged thousands of times without showing signs of degraded performance.
Lithium Sulfur Carbon Nanofiber Stanford University Scientists at Stanford say that silicon's ability to store many more lithium ions than current electrodes makes it an attractive choice to increase power density in batteries. But there's a catch: Silicon expands significantly when it absorbs ions, and that movement tends to break the conductivity path of the anode. However, making nanofibers out of the silicon reduces this effect. In addition, the team found carbon nanotubes coated on the inside with sulfur allows their batteries to store up to ten times the energy of conventional lithium batteries. They also say sulfur is a more environmentally friendly (and cheaper) electrode coating, because it is readily available and non-toxic.
Lithium Manganese Composite/Silicon Carbon Nanocomposite Envia Systems Envia's primary development is a proprietary cathode material based on manganese, an abundant metal that is stable when used in the battery. Manganese is also less expensive than the more common cobalt-based cathode material, Envia says. The firm has received grants from U.S. auto companies and federal and California energy agencies to continue developing the battery for commercial use; it says the battery could give a range of 300 miles in an EV.
Nissan just announced that, in conjunction with Japan’s Kansai University, it has built an electric vehicle charger that is capable of fully recharging a car in just 10 minutes. One of the biggest downsides of current electric vehicles and their accompanying charging stations is that it usually takes about 8 hours to fully recharge a battery. This new charging station, when commercialized, could open up the door to a whole new demographic of people who aren’t willing to wait — the only problem is they’ll have to wait about a decade for Nissan to get this thing into dealerships.
So if you took the 233 billion, well, you're talking Saudi Arabia numbers. It's massive, it's just huge.