This concept struck me last night, so take it with a grain of salt and note following is not an assertion or a theory but more or less a
contemplation. It is not meant to over turn or discredit but given as something to consider and excuse any misuse of proper semantics...so bearing
that in mind:
A vacuum is not considered to be a pure vacuum; because of energy that was found within the vacuum unexpectedly. Studies were done; and it was decided
to call these unexpected particles of in a vacuum "virtual particles"
“The quantum theory asserts that a vacuum, even the most perfect vacuum devoid of any matter, is not really empty. Rather the quantum vacuum can be
depicted as a sea of continuously appearing and disappearing [pairs of] particles that manifest themselves in the apparent jostling of particles that
is quite distinct from their thermal motions. These particles are ‘virtual’, as opposed to real, particles. ...At any given instant, the vacuum is
full of such virtual pairs, which leave their signature behind, by affecting the energy levels of atoms.”
First some refresher to have some concepts in mind:
Virtual particles do not necessarily carry the same mass as the corresponding real particle, although they always conserve energy and momentum. The
longer the virtual particle exists, the closer its characteristics comes to those of ordinary particles. Virtual particles may be thought of as
arising due to the time-energy uncertainty principle. They are important in the physics of many processes, including particle scattering and Casimir
forces.
In quantum field theory, the Casimir effect and the Casimir–Polder force are physical forces arising from a quantized field. The typical example is
of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, placed a few micrometers apart as in a capacitor but without any external electromagnetic field. In a
classical description, the lack of an external field also means that there is no field between the plates, and no force would be measured between
them. When this field is instead studied using the QED vacuum of quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons
which constitute the field, and generate a net force, either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates.
Although the Casimir effect can be expressed in terms of virtual particles interacting with the objects, it is best described and more easily
calculated in terms of the zero-point energy of a quantized field in the intervening space between the objects.
Ok; now that that is clear in mind, here's the thought that struck me last night. If there is an energy inside of a vacuum that was not expected it
got called a virtual particle because it basically has a smaller mass. Well lets now consider an effect of a vacuum, put in a foam ball in a vacuum
and what occurs? It shrinks in mass...now lets consider the possibility that any electrons or other particle in a vacuum will also compress into a
smaller mass...now would that be a virtual particle or a particle affected by one of the properties of a vacuum?
So, if I managed to keep attention at this point a little more refresher for clarity:
The fundamental equation of electrostatics is Coulomb's law, which describes the electric force between two point charges. The electric field
associated with a classical point charge increases to infinity as the distance from the point charge decreases towards zero making energy (thus mass)
of point charge infinite.
An exciton is a bound state of an electron and hole which are attracted to each other by the electrostatic Coulomb force. It is an electrically
neutral quasiparticle that exists in insulators, semiconductors and in some liquids. The exciton is regarded as an elementary excitation of condensed
matter that can transport energy without transporting net electric charge.
Well, what exactly does this have to do with a vacuum and shrinking particles? Nothing that the moment. So...lets go here first:
The Coulomb force (static electric force) between electric charges. It is caused by the exchange of virtual photons. In symmetric 3-dimensional space
this exchange results in the inverse square law for electric force. Since the photon has no mass, the coulomb potential has an infinite range.
Here's where part of my thought last night led after thinking of shrinky dink particles in a vacuum...I thought well how did the particles get in
there to ruin a perfect vacuum in the first place? I thought of static electricity and how it gets generated.
I thought of how water moving through a pipe; can create an electrical charge due to static electricity. Then I thought well there are a lot of water
particles in the air, otherwise dehumidifiers are a scam.
In essence, when we are creating a vacuum we are pulling particles across the surface of the vacuum chamber and...you guessed it my next thought the
process of creating a vacuum and generating static electricity in the process; it would not be unreasonable to make a logical assumption that perhaps
this is the origin of where the unknown energy in a vacuum comes from.
Definition: exciton
An exciton is a bound state of an electron and hole which are attracted to each other by the electrostatic Coulomb force. It is an electrically
neutral quasi particle that exists in insulators, semiconductors and in some liquids. The exciton is regarded as an elementary excitation of condensed
matter that can transport energy without transporting net electric charge.
The key thing I wish to point out in that definition is "in insulators" vacuum chambers are typically made from an insulator to achieve a high level
of purity inside the vacuum.
So there's the contemplation is in a nut shell. The process of creating a vacuum, possibly creates anomalous effects...leading to possible
misconceptions about what is actually occurring with the phenomena. Are there virtual particles, or just compressed particles? Is the vacuum not a
true vacuum because; in the process of creating a vacuum; it generates static electricity from the removal of particles, thus exciting the conductor
or internal experiment, and this is where the mysterious particles of energy actually come from inside a vacuum? It sounds more logical to me, than
theoretical particles appearing out of thin air, or creating new theoretical one's called virtual. Or creating uncertainty principals, to deal with
the apparent free energy that arises from violating thermal laws of dynamics...
Please do not forget this is the result of reasoning; I am not trying to postulate or create a new theory, just provoke thought on the subject. I will
be happy to clarify points; but I will not defend or engage in debate...unless to clarify a contextual misinterpretation, but feel free to debate
among yourselves. I realize this contemplation throws quantum mechanics on it's ear...a little.
Sources:
Virtual Particles
Electric Field in a vacuum
Point particles
QED vacuum
Casimir effect
Exciton