Triangle Shaped UFO in NASA Photo

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:08 PM
link   
Two photos would pretty much cancel out the 'smear or smudge' theory I would imagine. I don't know what to make of this so......
Not sure what more there is to say except can anyone make out the date?





eol.jsc.nasa.gov...







posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:10 PM
link   
take a look in the most discussed/flagged topic's theres one/near the moon on the moon
edit on 21-1-2013 by haven123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by haven123
take a look in the most discussed/flagged topic's


Unless I missed something, that thread is on the Moon. This is over Earth
www.abovetopsecret.com...

If I'm wrong, please show me the thread because this just came out.
Thanks



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:13 PM
link   
Nice image.

Looks like the date is the 36th of January 2012 to me.


I'll have a closer look mate.

ETA:

Here's the mission specs.

Mission: SATCOM KU-1
Space Shuttle: Columbia
Launch Pad: 39A
Launch Weight: 256,003 pounds
Launched: January 12, 1986, 6:55:00 a.m. EST
Landing Site: Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.
Landing: January 18, 1986, 5:58:51 a.m. PST
Landing Weight: 210,161 pounds
Runway: 22
Rollout Distance: 10,202 feet
Rollout Time: 59 seconds
Revolution: 98
Mission Duration: 6 days, 2 hours, 3 minutes, 51 seconds
Returned to KSC: January 23, 1986
Orbit Altitude: 212 nautical miles
Orbit Inclination: 28.5 degrees
Miles Traveled: 2.5 million
edit on 21-1-2013 by MysterX because: added comment



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


i know i posted too soon iv edited it now



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by haven123
take a look in the most discussed/flagged topic's theres one/near the moon on the moon
edit on 21-1-2013 by haven123 because: (no reason given)



I noticed how you added the "Moon" part afterward.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by haven123
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


i know i posted too soon iv edited it now


Not a problem


So? What do you think?

This is a little out of my comfort zone because I know little about space imagery.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:15 PM
link   
Judging by the first image that thing looks pretty large. Wonder what people are going to say this is?

"Chinese lantern".

-SAP-



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:16 PM
link   
Just updated my earlier post with this mission specs.

It was (oops) 1986.
edit on 21-1-2013 by MysterX because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by haven123
take a look in the most discussed/flagged topic's


Unless I missed something, that thread is on the Moon. This is over Earth
www.abovetopsecret.com...

If I'm wrong, please show me the thread because this just came out.
Thanks


Why even bother ?
It's not like we're not used to debunkers who don't even look at the evidence.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:17 PM
link   
NASA seems to know what it is...


Identification

Mission: STS61C Roll: 31 Frame: 2 Mission ID on the Film or image: 61-C
Country or Geographic Name: ATLANTIC OCEAN
Features: SPACE DEBRIS
Center Point Latitude: Center Point Longitude: (Negative numbers indicate south for latitude and west for longitude)
Stereo: No (Yes indicates there is an adjacent picture of the same area)
ONC Map ID: JNC Map ID:


eol.jsc.nasa.gov...

But, if you want to call it a UFO then that is up to you, but as shown above it has been identified...



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by MysterX
Nice image.

Looks like the date is the 36th of January 2012 to me.


I'll have a closer look mate.

ETA:

Here's the mission specs.

Mission: SATCOM KU-1
Space Shuttle: Columbia
Launch Pad: 39A
Launch Weight: 256,003 pounds
Launched: January 12, 1986, 6:55:00 a.m. EST
Landing Site: Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.
Landing: January 18, 1986, 5:58:51 a.m. PST
Landing Weight: 210,161 pounds
Runway: 22
Rollout Distance: 10,202 feet
Rollout Time: 59 seconds
Revolution: 98
Mission Duration: 6 days, 2 hours, 3 minutes, 51 seconds
Returned to KSC: January 23, 1986
Orbit Altitude: 212 nautical miles
Orbit Inclination: 28.5 degrees
Miles Traveled: 2.5 million
edit on 21-1-2013 by MysterX because: added comment




Thanks, however this was supposedly found through NASA's archives though


ETA: I didn't see the '36th' part. So, nevermind!




Published on Jan 21, 2013

Please Thumbs Up, Comment and Share. This Triangle Shaped UFO found while looking through photos on the NASA archive images site. This Triangle shaped UFO is interesting and important because it is actually captured in two photos. This UFO is in the more traditional shape. Given its size relative to earth is it possible that this triangle shaped UFO is responsible for sightings such as the Phoenix Lights?
edit on 21-1-2013 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:20 PM
link   
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
 


That's a very large chunk of space debris...


-SAP-



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
NASA seems to know what it is...


Identification

Mission: STS61C Roll: 31 Frame: 2 Mission ID on the Film or image: 61-C
Country or Geographic Name: ATLANTIC OCEAN
Features: SPACE DEBRIS
Center Point Latitude: Center Point Longitude: (Negative numbers indicate south for latitude and west for longitude)
Stereo: No (Yes indicates there is an adjacent picture of the same area)
ONC Map ID: JNC Map ID:


eol.jsc.nasa.gov...

But, if you want to call it a UFO then that is up to you, but as shown above it has been identified...




Well that's mighty convenient. Unless they can identify this triangular looking 'debris' then that's as arbitrary as it gets. So another words, any and all 'things' found on NASA photos are now debris? How very modern of them!



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by SloAnPainful
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
 


That's a very large chunk of space debris...


-SAP-


Isn't it.

And the astronaut who took the image framed it beautifully central too.

BTW, space debris is wildly generic..so of course it's a UFO (to the poster who said 'it's identified')



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chrysalis

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by haven123
take a look in the most discussed/flagged topic's


Unless I missed something, that thread is on the Moon. This is over Earth
www.abovetopsecret.com...

If I'm wrong, please show me the thread because this just came out.
Thanks


Why even bother ?
It's not like we're not used to debunkers who don't even look at the evidence.



But ya know what? It's an honest mistake.
I too had to make sure they were different topics so.....we should cut 'em some slack



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by SloAnPainful
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
 


That's a very large chunk of space debris...


-SAP-


How often do you see space debris formed into a perfect triangle?



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by MysterX
Isn't it.

And the astronaut who took the image framed it beautifully central too.

BTW, space debris is wildly generic..so of course it's a UFO (to the poster who said 'it's identified')



This was taken on the ISS, right? Do the astronauts take the photos or is the camera a part of the station itself taking random photos? I honestly haven't a clue and could care less except for now



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Juggernog

Originally posted by SloAnPainful
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
 


That's a very large chunk of space debris...


-SAP-


How often do you see space debris formed into a perfect triangle?


At least once.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Maybe, but I just had to put it out there before the rest of the lemmings army come and star his post.

So, on this archive, some are classified as "DEBRIS" and others as "DEBRIS?".
They seem to be sure about this one.

I rather not linger on triangle shape reports because the discussions around these cases are usually dull.

But, interesting to note is that even a pic from NASA, with top notch equipment, can reach us with funky pixels and compression artifacts. Pic being legit or not.





new topics

top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join