It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GermanShep
We give the brothers free everything and they still commit crime in record numbers. F them. Ungrateful aholes.
Gs
Originally posted by capone1
Immediate debt? Sure. But it IS worth it to get your degree. I feel the key is choosing a college that isn't stupidly expensive. There are some great colleges that offer minimal costs compared to more expensive schools.
Originally posted by cartesia
Originally posted by capone1
Immediate debt? Sure. But it IS worth it to get your degree. I feel the key is choosing a college that isn't stupidly expensive. There are some great colleges that offer minimal costs compared to more expensive schools.
It WAS worth it at one point, no more though. University degrees used to set you apart from the crowd, now they are common - it's expected that people who dont pickup a trade will go to university... a standard bachelors degree doesnt mean # anymore unless its in a very limited number of fields.
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
reply to post by NarrowGate
schooling should be free
Nothing is 'free', every action has a cost.
I take it you are throwing in the towel? OK.
Did you miss the part about..... you know what never mind...
You are a teacher? Glad I am not paying to go to school right now. We need a higher caliber of teachers!
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Take note, I did not criticise free capital. What I said is that entry to a top university should not come with a requirement for an abundance of it.
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
reply to post by NarrowGate
schooling should be free
Nothing is 'free', every action has a cost.
I take it you are throwing in the towel? OK.
Did you miss the part about..... you know what never mind...
You are a teacher? Glad I am not paying to go to school right now. We need a higher caliber of teachers!
No, I'm not throwing in the towel, whatever made you think that?
Praxelogical analysis clearly shows, using logical factualities, that every economic action has a cost, and more over every single action and choice you make IS economic.
You assert that "education should be free" and I'm pointing out that nothing is free, there is always a cost carried by somebody.
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Take note, I did not criticise free capital. What I said is that entry to a top university should not come with a requirement for an abundance of it.
Market forces should dictate prices in order for said resources to be allocated most efficiently.
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Take note, I did not criticise free capital. What I said is that entry to a top university should not come with a requirement for an abundance of it.
Market forces should dictate prices in order for said resources to be allocated most efficiently.
Has nothing to do with education. You are talking about services and goods, neither of which education falls into imho. It is a basic human right, but ok .
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Take note, I did not criticise free capital. What I said is that entry to a top university should not come with a requirement for an abundance of it.
Market forces should dictate prices in order for said resources to be allocated most efficiently.
Has nothing to do with education. You are talking about services and goods, neither of which education falls into imho. It is a basic human right, but ok .
I think you use 'right' as to mean 'entitlement'.
Nobody is entitled to another persons labour/property.
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Take note, I did not criticise free capital. What I said is that entry to a top university should not come with a requirement for an abundance of it.
Market forces should dictate prices in order for said resources to be allocated most efficiently.
Has nothing to do with education. You are talking about services and goods, neither of which education falls into imho. It is a basic human right, but ok .
I think you use 'right' as to mean 'entitlement'.
Nobody is entitled to another persons labour/property.
Who said someone has to labor for me to get an education? I have a library up the road. The only problem is, they won't give me a degree no matter what test I can pass. That's how the system works. Are you going to reply to the thread I asked you to? I would like input coming from your perspective.
No it is a basic human right. Whether or not the rest of the humans view it as valid depends on whether or not they are thinking. If they believe education is only found in universities they are mistaken. For this reason, universities should be free so that free-thinking people can have a larger impact on society. I don't want to pay for my propaganda....edit on 23-1-2013 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Why not pay the teachers more AND make the universities free? Or do you think this is impossible? Yes someone has to pay the price with money which is irrelevant. It is a tool, not to be worshiped. I refer you to my other thread of why this will not happen. It is not that it should not it is that with the current mentality of people - it will not. Big difference.
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Why not pay the teachers more AND make the universities free? Or do you think this is impossible? Yes someone has to pay the price with money which is irrelevant. It is a tool, not to be worshiped. I refer you to my other thread of why this will not happen. It is not that it should not it is that with the current mentality of people - it will not. Big difference.
It is not irrelevant - why should X have to pay for Y, especially if X doesn't receive the same benefit (perhaps he chooses not to go to university)?
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Why not pay the teachers more AND make the universities free? Or do you think this is impossible? Yes someone has to pay the price with money which is irrelevant. It is a tool, not to be worshiped. I refer you to my other thread of why this will not happen. It is not that it should not it is that with the current mentality of people - it will not. Big difference.
It is not irrelevant - why should X have to pay for Y, especially if X doesn't receive the same benefit (perhaps he chooses not to go to university)?
Because X is a part of a group of people with 99% of the money? It gets worse the higher you go the more blatantly malicious it becomes. The bottom of the 1% is nothing compared to the top.
The prisoners dilemma my friend, don't go snitchin on your fellow man .edit on 23-1-2013 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by NarrowGate
Originally posted by 1nquisitive
Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by 1nquisitive
Why not pay the teachers more AND make the universities free? Or do you think this is impossible? Yes someone has to pay the price with money which is irrelevant. It is a tool, not to be worshiped. I refer you to my other thread of why this will not happen. It is not that it should not it is that with the current mentality of people - it will not. Big difference.
It is not irrelevant - why should X have to pay for Y, especially if X doesn't receive the same benefit (perhaps he chooses not to go to university)?
Because X is a part of a group of people with 99% of the money? It gets worse the higher you go the more blatantly malicious it becomes. The bottom of the 1% is nothing compared to the top.
The prisoners dilemma my friend, don't go snitchin on your fellow man .edit on 23-1-2013 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)
There will always be richer people.