Sandy Hook Smoking Gun, Did CNN Really show a drill at St. Rose Pre-School as live Sandy Hook?

page: 6
37
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32

Originally posted by LordAdef

Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by LordAdef
 


It was a mistake by cnn in the ludicrous race to get the scoop. That simple.

As for why it ticks so off, read his other posts on the topic. He explains it fairly well.
And I think he'd care about anyone claiming 26 women and children who were massacred, just faked it all. But u don't speak for him, so that's only my guess.


Bk, it's not 'that' simple...The race for the scoop lead cnn to broadcast a wrong place? I have to tell you this: I work for the third biggest TV Broadcast company in the world, so i believe I can tell you that 'this' mistake is bizarre... Or CNN is really falling apart with incompetent employers...

Concerning the 26 women and children can you deny what I stated in the underlind sentence? Was Sandy Hook massacre in CONGO.. Would ATS censoring the threads?

Cheers


Yes I believe cnn really is that bad.

And I yes ats would be handling it the same I believe. As long as the reaction was the same. Which more to your point, it wouldn't be. The reaction would never be as large. But if people were attacking innocent civilians and posting personal private info, my bet is ats would be doing the same. But I don't speak for ats, so it's my educated guess.


So if you believe Cnn is THAT BAD... and they managed to show the world a wrong scenario...Can you consider possible they could even stage witnesses??




posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost375

Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by BrandonD
 


I agree with you. But Im sorry. I dont know how else to think of someone who insinuates that children didn't die and the emotions of those families are fake. That is what is so disgusting to me.


That's the theory that is being pushed on the mainstream news as being said by conspiracy theorists. Most have been saying the children died, but our government was responsible, not some random kid.

The News always pick out the most asinine version of conspiracy theories that only like 2 people actually believe.


And yet the problem with that is it's not just a couple people. The video with umpteen million hits on YouTube that had been posted on this site numerous times purports just that. It denounces the father of one of the many slain children because he smiled. Therefore insinuating he's an actor and then further insinuating the child is alive. Thus the theory is no one died.


It's one o, if not the main theory of sandy hook



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ghost375

The News always pick out the most asinine version of conspiracy theories that only like 2 people actually believe.



There are a lot more than 2 people pushing the "the parents are actors" theories. For one thing it's featured in that viral video with the 10 million views. Of course the MSM is going to pick up on something asinine like that.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:41 AM
link   
reply to post by LordAdef
 


No. Because that goes down the rabbit hole which ends with no victims.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:45 AM
link   
reply to post by soulwaxer
 


SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
You might wake him up!




posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by LordAdef
 


No. Because that goes down the rabbit hole which ends with no victims.


No it doesn't. There could be victims AND staged actors.

You really need to work on your reasoning skills...

soulwaxer



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:49 AM
link   
reply to post by SkepticOverlord
 


The very purpose of ATS is to explore all avenues... no matter how difficult the material...

Blessings..



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32

Originally posted by R_Clark
This has the hallmarks of the greatest story of 2013.. Great catch, Op.. 5 stars, flag, and a kitchen sink..


Really? What do you say to the argument that this wasn't a drill but a false alarm at another school?


Didn't the St. Rose Lima Threat happen on the sunday (16th dec), a bomb hoax ? Well that's the only info I can find anyway. If that's the case the live footage in question here has nothing to do with that threat as it was aired live on the 14th.

Could someone help me with this ? Thanks.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:50 AM
link   
reply to post by soulwaxer
 


If there are victims, then what is the point of actors. And which roles would they be playing? Teachers or staff? No, the other staff would know who they were. Kids? No, the government did not place 6 year Olds in sandy hook to act as paid actors.

So what's left? On lookers? For what point? All the action happened inside

Hows that for reasoning..
edit on 21-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:01 AM
link   
reply to post by bknapple32
 




If there are victims, then what is the point of actors.


control obviously. what if one of the victims parents was STILL a strong supporter of the second? and said so during an interview?



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:05 AM
link   
reply to post by bknapple32
 


Not necessarilly.
As you said, you don't thrust your media (cnn) and you believe that in a hurry for prime news they showed the wrong spot (this is unimaginable for any serious media).

In the same hurry and impossible to interview the real victims' parents, they staged the interviews? If you think cnn is that bad I wouldn't discard this as a remote possibility.

What I say here (and this is on topic) is that "non" conspiracy theorists are equally lacking reliable information for your press is acting dodgy, unreliable and misleading. Then, why blame the conspiracy theorists for raising the questions your press is incapable of clarifying?

And for that same reason the censoring here in ATS is illogical in my point of view (and in of many other members).

The op's thread is about the press broadcasting the wrong spot. So I'm in the topic. The main consequence of this single "real" evidence is that things are not being shown the way they should be. Maybe it was only the wrong spot, maybe not.

If people got "too" carried away with their questions, skeptics are too much relying in a biased and controlled media as well as relying in the official story
edit on 21-1-2013 by LordAdef because: (no reason given)
edit on 21-1-2013 by LordAdef because: english..
edit on 21-1-2013 by LordAdef because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:05 AM
link   
Anyways footage will not be a problem soon, there will be plenty of it :

www.courant.com...

There is apparently discusion on re-creating the scene of friday 14th december...



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by soulwaxer
 


If there are victims, then what is the point of actors. And which roles would they be playing? Teachers or staff? No, the other staff would know who they were. Kids? No, the government did not place 6 year Olds in sandy hook to act as paid actors.

So what's left? On lookers? For what point? All the action happened inside

Hows that for reasoning..
edit on 21-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)



Originally posted by soulwaxer

Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by LordAdef
 


No. Because that goes down the rabbit hole which ends with no victims.


No it doesn't. There could be victims AND staged actors.

You really need to work on your reasoning skills...

soulwaxer


If the scenario was perpetrated by a group of people with a social conditioning agenda, rather than a lone nut, this group would certainly want to make sure that the message the public receives from this tragedy is exactly the message that they are intended to receive.

And what better way to do this than planted actors? I actually work part-time in an elementary school, and it is very unlikely that a school staff member knows every single student and every single parent.

I am not in any way claiming that this is the scenario that actually took place, I do not consider myself informed enough to make that conclusion. But I could certainly see how someone else might have such a reasonable suspicion, and so it seems worth considering and not just blowing off as ridiculous.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by soulwaxer
 


If there are victims, then what is the point of actors. And which roles would they be playing? Teachers or staff? No, the other staff would know who they were. Kids? No, the government did not place 6 year Olds in sandy hook to act as paid actors.

So what's left? On lookers? For what point? All the action happened inside

Hows that for reasoning..
edit on 21-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)


That's pretty sad reasoning right there.

There could be many reasons for actors if there were victims. For one thing, if there is a conspiracy here, you would want the viewer's emotions to run as deep as possible, and there might not be a parent readily available to talk on camera in front of the press after only one day following this tragedy.

soulwaxer



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by sweord
reply to post by bknapple32
 




If there are victims, then what is the point of actors.


control obviously. what if one of the victims parents was STILL a strong supporter of the second? and said so during an interview?


Sorry, there is absolutely no way you could interject "actors" into a situation like that in a small town and not get busted immediately. .



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by DelMarvel

Originally posted by sweord
reply to post by bknapple32
 




If there are victims, then what is the point of actors.


control obviously. what if one of the victims parents was STILL a strong supporter of the second? and said so during an interview?


Sorry, there is absolutely no way you could interject "actors" into a situation like that in a small town and not get busted immediately. .


i was answering his question on how his reasoning was, not making a statement whether there were actors there.

btw the answer? not good.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by BrandonD
I actually work part-time in an elementary school, and it is very unlikely that a school staff member knows every single student and every single parent.



But how likely is it that NO school staff member would know a given parent or student?



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by DelMarvel

Originally posted by sweord
reply to post by bknapple32
 




If there are victims, then what is the point of actors.


control obviously. what if one of the victims parents was STILL a strong supporter of the second? and said so during an interview?


Sorry, there is absolutely no way you could interject "actors" into a situation like that in a small town and not get busted immediately. .


Why not?

Besides, MANY people ARE questioning the veracity of some of these witnesses.

I haven't been able to confirm this, but there has been talk of all the parents of the victims receiving protection from the press. I believe by armed guards at their homes. If anyone can confirm this, I would appreciate it. If true, it would certainly add credibility to the fact that they are being manipulated in some way.

soulwaxer



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:31 AM
link   
And just to note, also that aerial video of St rose was clearly recorded in the late afternoon, and not on the day of the bomb hoax (no sun that day).
edit on 21-1-2013 by WeSbO because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:32 AM
link   
Didn't the police conquer the entire state of Connecticut that day?

Now they're working on the nation.





top topics
 
37
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join