posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 10:44 AM
Originally posted by FirstCasualty
This might sound like an dumb question but i have heard this before and I have to ask. Since any American is entitled to what ever weapon is
available to the government, does that mean that every American is entitled to a nuclear warhead and am armed jet fighter with a runway?
Where is the line drawn on that one?
Just tell the others to use logic when you faced such questions.
The purpose of the 2nd amendment is to protect the citizen, his loved ones and nation using EFFECTIVE arms, as an individual co-opt into the
Can the individual or even a district militia MAINTAIN an aircraft, missile or nuke weapon effectively? Owning one is not the same as maintaining one
effectively, to keep it up operable. You can buy a jet, or missles, but it will only be deadweights to your armoury, gathering dust and rust, posing a
danger to yourself and those around you.
Better one keep to handheld weapons that are more effective for protection and raids if it comes to that. WIth only ak-47s, the Taliban could hold
even nuclear armed Pakistan hostage to its demands for decades, with Pakistan unable to do a damn thing.