reply to post by Z32Driver
The one for the Navy also isn't for chemtrails. It's a way to make towed targets and their carrier aircraft visible. A towed target doesn't have
an engine, so there is no heat source to vaporize oil to create a smoke trail. That makes it hard to see for the ship to shoot at sometimes. This
way would leave a trail to allow them to see where the target it.
Anamolous cloud formation & strange spiral contrails., page 3
reply posted on 18-2-2013 @ 07:02 PM by Z32Driver
reply to post by Zaphod58
Nice observation!
Cant believe i missed that...
But.. whose to say that this "low in cost and readily available" is used exclusively for making targets as visible as possible?
Sure, I don't have another link showing its being done for temp mitigation or whatever (reading all day, too tired to continue finding proof tonight) ..it seems like it'd be awfully easy to do tho. Just my opinion.
"The term "contrail" was adopted for convenience in identifying the visible powder trail of this invention."
This is a interesting claim though don't you think!?
I've been getting slightly flamed "Its just contrails blah blah blah" this whole time!
If this claim is true (navy patent seems legit enough for me) then
Thanks for your continued input everyone!
Nice observation!
Cant believe i missed that...
But.. whose to say that this "low in cost and readily available" is used exclusively for making targets as visible as possible?
Sure, I don't have another link showing its being done for temp mitigation or whatever (reading all day, too tired to continue finding proof tonight) ..it seems like it'd be awfully easy to do tho. Just my opinion.
"The term "contrail" was adopted for convenience in identifying the visible powder trail of this invention."
This is a interesting claim though don't you think!?
I've been getting slightly flamed "Its just contrails blah blah blah" this whole time!
If this claim is true (navy patent seems legit enough for me) then
Thanks for your continued input everyone!
reply posted on 18-2-2013 @ 07:22 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by Z32Driver
Yeah, but they used it because it looks similar to a contrail, but can't be called a contrail. A contrail is caused by engine exhaust. Since there's no engine exhaust involved, it's not a contrail.
Yeah, but they used it because it looks similar to a contrail, but can't be called a contrail. A contrail is caused by engine exhaust. Since there's no engine exhaust involved, it's not a contrail.
reply posted on 18-2-2013 @ 08:07 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Z32Driver
reply to post by Zaphod58
"The term "contrail" was adopted for convenience in identifying the visible powder trail of this invention."
This is a interesting claim though don't you think!?
interesting in what way?
It is explaining a term used.....so no, I dont' see it as interesting somuch as explanatory. Explainations are generally a good think since htey increase understanding.
I've been getting slightly flamed "Its just contrails blah blah blah" this whole time!
If this claim is true (navy patent seems legit enough for me) then
it is not a "claim" - it is a statement.
They know it is not a contrail in the normal sense and specifically say as much.
edit on 18-2-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
1980 NBC News Clip on "Contrails" That Can Change the Weather.global warming?
Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Want to see how your food, air, and water is becoming contaminated? Dont get angry, be more aware an
Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.066 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.066 seconds
