It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Even if power levels achieved were insufficient to be an effective strike weapon, the potential for psychological operations in many situations could be fantastic
it makes what are otherwise the results of deliberate actions appear to be the consequences of natural weather phenomena
How will the military, in general, and the USAF, in particular, manage and employ a weathermodification capability?
Our vision is that by 2025 the military could influence the weather on a mesoscale (
Originally posted by Z32Driver
reply to post by stars15k
What I'm saying is I believe its certainly possible and even reasonable that there is some mechanism that can and is being deployed to create these persistent spreaders.
I was reading about how even adding small amounts of whatever to the fuel would really catalyze the contrail-formation process.
At an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010, scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food shortages. The military-industrial complex stands poised to capitalize on controlling the world’s weather.
“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.” ~World Meteorological Organization, 2007
Going under a variety of names – atmospheric geoengineering, weather modification, solar radiation management, chemical buffering, cloud seeding, weather force multiplication – toxic aerial spraying is popularly known as chemtrails. However, this is merely one technique employed to modify weather. The practice of environmental modification is vast and well funded.
2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.
This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.
This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared for public release.
I have read the report being talked about in your source. The symposium was not a good source of information. It is biased from the start, by making the presumption that "chemtrails" were real, and never really questioned.
Do you really think something like this would be cleared for public release if it were true? Of course not. If it was in operation, we probably wouldn't know a thing about it. Yet here it is on the web.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Z32Driver
My thoughts are, why does the "Belford Group" which held that supposed "international symposium" remain anonymous? Why do they claim that "spraying" is being done yet provide no evidence that it is?
No. There are plenty of people doing it. Making movies, selling t-shirts. I think it's because it would show that that the "Group" is just a couple of people (or one person) of no more importance than any of the others but by maintaining their anonymity they can continue to delude people into thinking their claims carry some weight.
Do you think just maybe there is a little danger when doing our best to expose the enormous deception against us and our lands?
No. No such evidence.
Evidence is everywhere friend, our soil, our blood, our health, our animals, our wild life, our water, our air, Evidence is everywhere for those who will look into aerial geo engineering for them-selves.
The symposium was not a good source of information. It is biased from the start, by making the presumption that "chemtrails" were real, and never really questioned.
Seeding such cirrus with very efficient heterogeneous ice nuclei should produce larger ice crystals due to vapor competition effects, thus increasing OLR and surface cooling. SNIP A potential delivery mechanism for the seeding material is already in place: the airline industry.
Light scattering pigment powder particles, surface treated to minimize inparticle cohesive forces, are dispensed from a jet mill deagglomerator as separate single particles to produce a powder contrail having maximum visibility or radiation scattering ability for a given weight material.
An earlier known method in use for contrail generation involves oil smoke trails produced by injecting liquid oil directly into the hot jet exhaust of an aircraft target vehicle. The oil vaporizes and recondenses being the aircraft producing a brilliant white trail. Oil smoke trail production requires a minimum of equipment; and, the material is low in cost and readily available.
The present invention is for a powder generator requiring no heat source to emit a "contrail" with sufficient visibility to aid in visual acquisition of an aircraft target vehicle and the like. The term "contrail" was adopted for convenience in identifying the visible powder trail of this invention.