It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wha-ohh. The President swears to preserve, protect, and defend the wrong document.

page: 5
12
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by IndieA
I’ve been paying a lot of attention to names and words, and their meanings lately ....


Me too.


So the President just swore in on the wrong document.


Err, no he didn't. He swore in on a non existant document me thinks, not the "wrong" one.

If there are two documents, one titled "The Constitution of the United States of America" and another titled "The Constitution of the United States" then you might be correct.

Do both these document titles officially exist?



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:51 PM
link   
Didn't he screw it up the first time? Well at least we know that he consistent.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by nerbot

Originally posted by IndieA
I’ve been paying a lot of attention to names and words, and their meanings lately ....


Me too.


So the President just swore in on the wrong document.


Err, no he didn't. He swore in on a non existant document me thinks, not the "wrong" one.

If there are two documents, one titled "The Constitution of the United States of America" and another titled "The Constitution of the United States" then you might be correct.

Do both these document titles officially exist?


Not that I know of.

The non existent document makes the most sense unless there is a second document.
There are people who claim that the US in under the control of the UN.

So it seems the writers of our Constitution may have left the "America" out of the Presidents oath to allow for deniability.

Or maybe it’s our fault for assuming that the President is swearing an oath to preserve, protect, and defend The Constitution of the United States of America (the actual document), when that is not the case.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:18 PM
link   
Did anyone notice that Obama said “sta” instead of “state” in the second oath, the one he took today, Monday the 21st.

Here’s the quote “The office of the President of the United Sta”

And here's the video


I'll also note that this time he also used two books, said to be Bibles.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by IndieA
 


Some of you want any reason to string this man up from a lightpost and have your own version of history.

Compared with what some past presidents, bankers, ceo's have done, I really truley believe that there's a massive underlying of RACISM inside America's psyche.

Its such a disgrace and dissapointment how far American society has fallen!!

edit on 21-1-2013 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Agit8dChop
 


I’m just trying the break through the deception that surrounds us.

This is nothing personal against Obama. I think all people should be held accountable for their actions. This thread just so happens to be about the Presidential oath. Thanks for calling me a racist though, I appreciate that.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by IndieA
 


It wasnt really personal at you, more broad at ATS.

This is just another example that people will look for the smallest detail and create a huge issue out of it.

I said AMERICA has a pscyhe of racism running through it, if you choose to be a part of it or not I suppose its how objective and balanced you are in your opinions of him as a president.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by IndieA
 


As long as section 242, Title 18 of US Code is still in place, every law, decree and congressional act is null and void if it causes a member of the colors to trample or deprivate our rights. No law can be passed to cause a member of the Colors to act against our rights.

And I quote:

"Whoever, under color of ANY law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
or custom, WILLFULLY SUBJECTS ANY person in any State, Territory,
Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of ANY
rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different
punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being
an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed
for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death
results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or
an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned
for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to
death."

Our founders knew that a day would come when tyranny once again reared its head. They were Masons wanting to start a new order of things. Unfortunately, the bankers took us back again. Still yet, the document stands and MUST remain. All of the colors have a duty to preserve the rights guaranteed in this document.

Here is why it is too late for them to try: Global Financial Meltdown As they try, they will have no peace.

Enoch ONE

1.1 These are the words of the blessing of Enoch; according to which he
blessed the chosen and righteous who must be present on the day of
distress, which is appointed, for the removal of all the wicked and impious.
1.2 And Enoch began his story and said: -

They will be removed. The righteous must be on Earth to see it happen.


edit on 21-1-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 07:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Agit8dChop
 


Let me ask you this. How come Obama didn't say the word "State" this time?

To me it almost seems intentional.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 07:15 PM
link   
reply to post by IndieA
 


Clearly its because he plans to enslave America through mindcontrol and war. He's obviously the most evil man on the planet and this in no way is a gramatical/vocal error.
I'd be worried and start stockpiling an aresenal of weapons if i were you!

/sarcasm!
edit on 21-1-2013 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Agit8dChop
 


I'm pretty sure that's the wrong answer.

Seriously though, we the people have had so many freedoms infringed upon, that with this insane amount of debt, we are nearing slavery.

When I saw Obama sign the NDAA in the same room as The Constitution, I knew for sure that he had no intent on preserving, protecting, or defending it. Quite the opposite.

This thread isn’t about Obama though and just for the record I didn’t support Romney either. We have all been duped.

Gov shuts down in 2 months unless they give themselves a credit limit increase.
They borrow 40% of every dollar they spend and they have no desire to change that.

What do you think will happen?

I think I need to start reading up on the fall of Rome.



posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 09:04 AM
link   
It's never been in the oath. They've always had a back door to help them feel morally balanced on their death bed... "yeah, I did some messed up things in my time... but I NEVER swore to uphold the constitution of the United States of America, so they can't say it wasn't obvious... yes, they never wanted freedom or liberty or the responsibility of making decisions by themselves... they willingly let me do it all!"



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join