reply to post by hellobruce
See, I can do this too!
No real expert would declare a document that they have never seen a forgery.... and as to the draft card, how did they get it?
They haven't seen? The birth certificate was supposed to be a scan of the original and was placed on the official white house web site for everyone
too "see". Draft card, yep, again, everyone has seen it. What are you talking about?
No, their investigation was just nonsense. if they had any real evidence they would have done something with it (apart from using it for a
Please educate me as to what facts "they" presented that are nonsense. Please include specifics because not much of that investigation was nonsense
and I know because I have followed every piece of it and then did my own research on it so I would be interested to know what part you thought was
nonsense. While were on the topic, they are doing something with it and it's a little more constructive than your conjecture on the forums.
They certainly are, that is why courts have declared Obama a natural born citizen, and he willl be the legal president for 4 more years. All the
"evidence" used in about 200 birther court cases has been rejected as nonsense.
No court has ever "declared" Obama a natural born citizen. If they have done so then please direct me to one link where ANY court has made a decision
on Obama being a natural born citizen. You won't be able to because no such decision has been made and the reason that is so is very simple. Judges
are bound to hear cases based on standing and you have to secure that in order to be heard but guess what......? Attaining standing is kinda hard
against the standing POTUS, I wonder why?
You must think "research" is just posting the nonsense on birther websites.
Ironic since that is all you have done. I don't think you know a thing about the actual case. I don't think you have seen the evidence and I don't
think you really care. I think you just like people to reply to your uninformed posts because it creates a sense of debate for you somehow, regardless
of how one sided it may be.
Except that there is no "damning evidence", only birther nonsense! And you are not educating anyone.
There is plenty and for the record, I just educated you.
Also do you remember Poor Orly being sanctioned $20,000 for
Did I every bring "poor Orly" up? Was that person or argument part of the discussion? It was not, which makes this reference deflective, poorly
thought out and quite frankly, offensive.
And that is all birthers do, claim that they have evidence, when in fact all it is is stuff printed from the internet - nothing factual at all. So it
looks like you are the one trolling here, as you have no evidence, the same as poor Orly!
Again, Ironic as you are doing the same thing you claim others are doing. Making ill informed and uneducated statements on an issue you clearly have
done no research on and have no idea of the finer points of the argument. All you do in your defense is argue things like Orly. It's like the 9/11
people saying, OMFG, project blue beam nuts, yeah, holograms, you bunch of crazies without ever touching on any of the REAL evidence.
Try again if you want, but If I waste a second more of time on one of your posts, make it worth it.
edit on 23-1-2013 by Helious because: (no