The evolution of evolution, a more politically correct form of liberal science

page: 1
1

log in

join

posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 08:12 AM
link   
Evolutionists now say that all people are the same and they say there is no 'race', but they still embrace Darwin. How? Read what Darwin himself wrote

Darwin's most famous work, often abbreviated to The Origin of Species, was

The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection : the Preservation of FAVOURED RACES in the Struggle for Life.

www.amazon.com...

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world... The break between men and his nearest allies will then be wider. ..
We must not judge of the tastes of distinct species by a uniform standard; nor must we judge by the standard of man's taste. Even with man, we should remember what discordant noises, the beating of tom-toms and the shrill notes of reeds, please the ears of savages. ..
[Man] has diverged into distinct races, or as they may be more fitly called, sub-species. Some of these, such as the Negro and the European, are so distinct that, if specimens had been brought to a naturalist without any further information, they would undoubtedly have been considered as good and true species. ..
For my part I would as soon be descended from that heroic little monkey, who braved his dreaded enemy in order to save the life of his keeper, or from that old baboon, who descending from the mountains, carried away in triumph his young comrade from a crowd of astonished dogs – as from a savage who delights to torture his enemies, offers up bloody sacrifices, practices infanticide without remorse, treats his wives like slaves, knows no decency, and is haunted by the grossest superstitions. ..




Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, 1st ed., Penguin, London, 1968; pp. 94; 131; 217; The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed., John Murray, London, 1874, pp. 40; 99; 203; 225; 241; 580; 929; 946.
edit on 20-1-2013 by GeneralMishka because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 08:41 AM
link   
What is liberal science?



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
What is liberal science?


Thats when you take a theory and call it fact because you hate religion & conservatives



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 08:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by GeneralMishka

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
What is liberal science?


Thats when you take a theory and call it fact because you hate religion & conservatives


You don't understand how science works, do you?



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by GeneralMishka
 

It's obvious you've never actually read the book. If you had, you'd understand that he uses the word "races" to denote "varieties" and not the more modern connotation involving what we would today consider to be different races of men. If you had, you'd be aware that he refers to "the several races, for instance, of the cabbage" and "the hereditary varieties or races of our domestic animals and plants". His work where he actually discusses what we now refer to as race, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, makes it pretty clear that he rejected the notion that there's any difference between humans of different "races" other than superficial ones.

What was your point again?



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 09:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by iterationzero
What was your point again?

He/she didn't really make the point clear. It was kind of shrouded, which leads me to believe that this might just be another closet stormfront member trying to push a racial supremacy agenda. There have been quite a few of these in the past year or so.
edit on 20-1-2013 by Xaphan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 10:02 AM
link   
A bit too much Kent Hovind for this guy,
Trying to start something for no reason, with absolutely 0 content.



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 10:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
What is liberal science?


It's science with added pesky facts!



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 09:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by AngryCymraeg

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
What is liberal science?


It's science with added pesky facts!


Liberals change the facts to fit their own version of evolution where all humans are equal

Pretty funny!!



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 09:23 AM
link   

Liberals change the facts to fit their own version of evolution where all humans are equal

Pretty funny!!

Closet stormfront members post threads with absolutely zero evidence to back up their hypothesis and believe to this day that every single thing Darwin said/wrote is still 100% true, even though the theory of evolution has been refined many times over since Darwin's day.

Pretty funny!!

It seems like you believe everything he wrote because you want it to be true to fit some ulterior motive. Try to realize that the theory has been refined so much since his day, and that he was really just the first person to bring this hypothesis to the fore. It has been expanded and improved many times since then. Or, you know, instead of studying up to date material you can just keep reading books from the late 1800s if it stokes the fires of your eugenic wet dreams.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 10:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xaphan

Liberals change the facts to fit their own version of evolution where all humans are equal

Pretty funny!!

Closet stormfront members post threads with absolutely zero evidence to back up their hypothesis and believe to this day that every single thing Darwin said/wrote is still 100% true, even though the theory of evolution has been refined many times over since Darwin's day.

Pretty funny!!

It seems like you believe everything he wrote because you want it to be true to fit some ulterior motive. Try to realize that the theory has been refined so much since his day, and that he was really just the first person to bring this hypothesis to the fore. It has been expanded and improved many times since then. Or, you know, instead of studying up to date material you can just keep reading books from the late 1800s if it stokes the fires of your eugenic wet dreams.



As a Creationist, I just find liberal humilation in this field very entertaining



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 10:53 AM
link   
reply to post by GeneralMishka
 


Well as a conservative, I'm not sure why you are bringing up liberals. This is not a political issue. Also, you are misrepresenting Darwin's beliefs and what evolution is, so the only one being humiliated is you and you don't even realize it.





top topics
 
1

log in

join