It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
iTS VERY POSSIBLE ITS NOT REAL.
Originally posted by gortex
It looks like a UFO from an iphone UFO app ... the 4th one at the top on this video .
Originally posted by CrashUnderride
I agree with Robby Maradona on his comment on the webpage:
iTS VERY POSSIBLE ITS NOT REAL.
I mean, it's got the stereotypical flying saucer shape. I've never seen an image of a UFO shaped like that from the last twenty years, but that's me. Who knows, it could very well be legit.
Originally posted by blahxd67
Originally posted by CrashUnderride
I agree with Robby Maradona on his comment on the webpage:
iTS VERY POSSIBLE ITS NOT REAL.
I mean, it's got the stereotypical flying saucer shape. I've never seen an image of a UFO shaped like that from the last twenty years, but that's me. Who knows, it could very well be legit.
I agree that it could very well be a fake. I liked the video Gortex posted. It definitely seems like a hoax. However, none of those objects had motion blur in the app, but this one does. Can people fake motion blur?edit on 20-1-2013 by blahxd67 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Well the picture from the exif data
Taken with a Sony SLT 55 focal length set at 55mm f9 at 1/250th of a second.
Usually if any of these ufo apps are used the exif data is changed.
It's not a phone it's a SONY SLT55 DSLR.
So pic looks legit .
Will have a close look at and do some other work and see what turns up!
I have a SONY SLT as well a later model and I have the 18-55mm lens used for this picture.edit on 20-1-2013 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by markymint
iPhone app or real I think it's irrelevant either way, and just blurs the real content in this forum.
I question why anyone would think this kind of photo was relevant to anything constructive about the subject.
What is one frame going to deduce to you, of a micro-blur?
If it was taken during an actual sighting then it would be an important frame, perhaps.
The ability to bring decent critical analysis in these situations is great, but I'd also flag this topic (ufo's spotted in single frames of non-sighting events only on later inspection of photos) is never going to help, solve, prove or do anything beyond give someone a few moments of fun whilst they check into it and analyze it.
My point is, those looking for real answers should skip this step of people trying to decipher what a single-frame speck has to offer. It offers nothing - in the overall picture, unless of course it's a picture from an actual witnessed sighting (take the Battle of LA single frame for example)
Things hiding in the frames of time/photographs that just 'pop up' in the most mundane events surely should be the least of people's worries. Photographing some sheep on a mountain track or a police helicopter and later noticing you caught a blur, are real people doing this or government agencies? There are video sequences of real things happening that stretch minutes, witness sightings that last longer - and inject some real wonder and mystery into the field.
Like I said, the line gets blurred with topics like this one (not your fault OP, I blame the point of inception!) and ultimately it's the kind of photo that's just collateral UFO spam, it shouldn't be important to anyone either way what it might be. No-one witnessed it. We're not going to get the radar data of a micro-second blip.
New year, new opportunities, new ways of thinking - in terms of photos like this, my 2013 motto is:
GET REAL!!
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Pinke
Hi It may have happened at Mufon they have had the picture so they may have looked at it in an Adobe product and re-saved it
Originally posted by Pinke
Maybe Human Alien can tell us about MUFON's recent image handling / CMS etc ... but I've seen MUFON documents refer to things like EXIF data and most images that don't have it, I wouldn't expect it.