This whole thing is an absolute mess - which appears to be the exact goal.
I do not believe this tragedy was staged, even though I know it is possible that there may have been individuals involved, who played a fictional role
in the massacre.
I believe all the children were murdered there, as-well-as the adults, but the method employed by the suspect/s responsible for the murders is the
area where I feel the most deception comes from.
It's possible that this was not pre-planned in any way and the government picked up on the massacre immediately and began revealing details that
favor a push for their relevant agendas. There was a thread a while back that mentioned the 'no need' theory, which goes something like this;
The government has no need to perpetrate incredibly evil mass murders to further the agenda associated with firearm massacres. The only thing they
need to do is develop a plan with many discrepancies (used to keep the initial report malleable, so they can mold the 'official story' anyway they
please), then wait for the next person to have a bad reaction to their anti-psychotic meds, subsequently experiencing a massive mental breakdown and
going on a murderous rampage.
When that happens, they only need to reveal their pre-constructed storyline to satisfy the public launch of their agenda.
Personally, I do not believe this is what happened, though it is as plausible as any other idea.
I am sure most everyone has the MSM giving a lot of 'face-time' to the conspiracy theorist demographic. Just like with MSM reports of UFO sighting,
they try to use a broad brush stroke to paint all conspiracy theorists as unstable, half-cocked, un-educated, and paranoid individuals.
I mention this because they seem to be comeplete hypocrites when it comes to conspiracies surrounding this tragedy.
Someone told me, a few years ago, what it takes to be charged with criminal conspiracy, when there is no video, audio, or forensic evidence of an
individual pre-meditating a crime. You have probably heard of similar charges, as; conspiracy to commit robbery, conspiracy to commit homicide,
I couldn't remember the exact definition, but I looked and found it online here:
An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but
becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors. ,
The underlined portion of the definition seems an awful lot like what the media and reporters have done.
The fact that news agencies are blatantly ignoring their own visual proof and confirmed reports; video showing 2 weapons being removed from the trunk
and their reports of 4 hand-guns and only hand-guns being used during the massacre, could be described as conspiring to falsify and/or omit confirmed
proof as a way to deceive the general public for an unspecified motivating factor.
The guilty always point at everyone else, so they can deflect questions and suspiciouns of their role in the criminal conspiracy.