It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by six67seven
Originally posted by ckno1
Hope this wasn´t posted before. tried to search but didn´t find it:
This video is so good, so incredibly brilliant, solid and simple, that you will want to paste it all over your Facebooks and Twitters just to piss off all the IMBECILES who still claim that the Moon landings were faked.* The reason is simple: the technology to fake it didn't exist.
Must they be called "IMBECILES"?? Can't both sides be civil or at least the side that knows everything take the higher road?edit on 19-1-2013 by six67seven because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by broctune
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by muzzleflash
We would have technology to go to and walk on the moon....
But yet we didnt have the tech to fake some photos on a TV screen?
That's pretty laughable when you think about it.
Going to the moon is clearly the more difficult technological hurdle than hoaxing something.
Faking it is harder, if not impossible. How do you fake 1/6th gravity on Earth and make it in a complete vacuum on a very large set? You simply can not do that. It's much easier to simply go to the Moon.
Playing the video of astronauts running in slow motion creates the same visual as no gravity.
Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by wmd_2008
Nice photos, thanks for posting that.
So, they have the rockets running to soften the landing, not moving straight down but maybe a little sideways. What I was expecting to see is a spot, right under that main thruster, that is a big hole, or a pile of dust. You look at the pics and the surface seems very soft and dusty. Like in the lake, right behind where you tie up the motor boat there is always a big hole in the sand there from the force of the prop blowing the sand around.
Originally posted by immortalreiku
reply to post by ckno1
yes the video is good but the fact still remains. He does not talk about how we got humans to pass through 100s of miles of the van allen radiation belt. You can talk about photos and this and that. Until someone can solve that problem your just talking for the sake of talking. How convenient that the comments are disabled for this video otherwise he would have been lit up by like minded folk. Perpetuating this video just means people are trying to solidify the myth that we walked on the moon. when in fact we didnt
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Originally posted by taccj9903
I can't say for sure either way but I have always suspected something wasn't right about the whole thing. After I saw this interview I really want to know what is going on. I wonder what Neil Armstrong meant when he told that guy, "you do not deserve to know the answers."
edit on 19-1-2013 by taccj9903 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by animal55
I dont think the moon landings were faked because Edgar mitchell former astronaut and the sixth man to walk on the moon has told the world that the US government has witheld information of the ET presence on our Planet for years. So why would he tackle one conspiracy theory and not the socalled faked moon landings which he was in a perfect position to do so.
Originally posted by Panic2k11
reply to post by DJW001
I do not see how calling someone a "liar and idiot" addresses the points he makes. He even addresses other people criticism and remains pretty civil about it (even if he clearly is exasperated at times).
What is the relevance of the link to the other thread ?
Originally posted by ipsedixit
I don't believe we have been on the moon and consequently that any video or photographic evidence for a manned trip to the moon is faked. The narrator of the video says that it would be impossible to fake such film footage but goes on to explain how to do it. His objections to the procedures he cites seem to be that they are complex and that one would have to be very careful doing it.
Originally posted by davolobos
reply to post by ckno1
Why did we stop going to the moon? Why have others not attempted to get up there???