It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ckno1
Hope this wasn´t posted before. tried to search but didn´t find it:
This video is so good, so incredibly brilliant, solid and simple, that you will want to paste it all over your Facebooks and Twitters just to piss off all the IMBECILES who still claim that the Moon landings were faked.* The reason is simple: the technology to fake it didn't exist.
Originally posted by six67seven
Originally posted by ckno1
Hope this wasn´t posted before. tried to search but didn´t find it:
This video is so good, so incredibly brilliant, solid and simple, that you will want to paste it all over your Facebooks and Twitters just to piss off all the IMBECILES who still claim that the Moon landings were faked.* The reason is simple: the technology to fake it didn't exist.
Must they be called "IMBECILES"?? Can't both sides be civil or at least the side that knows everything take the higher road?edit on 19-1-2013 by six67seven because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
If the technology existed to go to the freaking moon, and film on the freaking moon, then why in the world would the technology not be available to 'fake' all of that? It doesn't make any sense.
If you're in the industry, you'd know...
that digital signals processed at 1 bit (not our whopping 64 bit of today), at millions of samples per second: are twice as resolute as 2 inch reel 24 track tape, or full chroma film. 1 bit facilitates far less processing power & allows for full redundancy (you can record multiple frames at once, in case a frame is dropped).
I know this, because I record audio at 1 bit/2.6 million samples per second. This technology was available to the public via the Sony corporation, since the late 1970s.
Originally posted by shefskitchen
I'm from the school of thought, that the military has had advanced flash based RAM recorders since the 1950s.
Think of gun camera footage, from old wars. Film would have taken too much space, for too little footage. Video transmission would be too un-secure, and resolution would be low. How can we watch half hour dogfights?
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
I did not watch the video, but wanted to comment on your claim that the technology to fake it did not exist. That is an extremely bold, yet incorrect statement. [sic] If the technology existed to go to the freaking moon, and film on the freaking moon, then why in the world would the technology not be available to 'fake' all of that? It doesn't make any sense.
Originally posted by taccj9903
I can't say for sure either way but I have always suspected something wasn't right about the whole thing. After I saw this interview I really want to know what is going on. I wonder what Neil Armstrong meant when he told that guy, "you do not deserve to know the answers."
edit on 19-1-2013 by taccj9903 because: (no reason given)
I'm not a lunar fanatic, I already know more about the tech to go to the moon that I care to know, my time to pursue this specific issue is limited and I do not waste listening to conjectures if I see some inconsistencies I assure you that I watches all of MoonFaker presentation and some of the response to criticisms and I stick to what I said it is the best free and open content on the subject.
Originally posted by Panic2k11
*snip*
In war since WW1 anything goes, even so you can look on how the Germans and English treated high patents and even POWs (amongst themselves) to get a glimpse on the type of mentality. *snip*/quote]
Oh, brother! Have you ever actually spoken to anyone that was THERE when our troops got into Germany, after the victory? I have. Very sweet German lady, who was a child at the time. The American troops were WONDERFUL towards the German people, and the same cannot be said for those of some other nations. She knew some ladies that found out how bad some were, and was very grateful that she was in a place that Americans were in charge, not some of our allies. The "mentality" was honorable.
As for the moon landing, those of us that were alive then, and watched it (and all the films and tv shows about space) know it was real. We know what fake looked like. Give it a rest, already. the space scenes in 2001 were BORING. The moon landings were exciting stuff. We went. The Russians didn't go because it had been done, it cost a ton of money, and there wasn't any real reason. That was the end goal of the race back then. We did it. What were they going to do, collect their own rocks? If it was all fake, they could have done that, too, and would have. Again, those of us alive then know the mentality.
Originally posted by PurpleVortex
IMHO, the moon landing videos are fake/edited. There are a lot of things Armstrong saw in the moon that are prohibited from the public eyes, and whatever he saw told him you are not welcome here again.