It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You started a good thread, but regardless of content some will question the OP...and they should, as this allows for all possibilities to be considered.
If you are not prepared to hear all opinions, you shouldn't be creating threads...
Just go with it...
The only proof you have is by comparing 2 pictures, that's just great. We all know pictures are not very reliable cause they can be doctored and out of focus and they can play tricks on the eyes with shadows and light. The problem with getting concrete proof about something on Mars or something that came from Mars is that you would actually have to travel there, and that's not gonna happen anytime soon. There's more proof of Atlantis than stuff about Mars.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
The Megalithic Builders of Mars
In this thread i put forward a theory that the Megalithic builds of Ancient stone structures on earth had origins from Mars. I believe the evidence comes in the form of understanding how the ancients megalithic builders from earths past were able to build structures of perfect aligmment such as this Wall in South America Mach Pichu.
Originally posted by reject
The northern hemisphere seems to have been thoroughly sandblasted somehow
Peru is a seismically unstable country—both Lima and Cusco have been leveled by earthquakes—and Machu Picchu itself was constructed atop two fault lines. When an earthquake occurs, the stones in an Inca building are said to “dance;” that is, they bounce through the tremors and then fall back into place. Without this building method, many of the best known buildings at Machu Picchu would have collapsed long ago.
but stress fractures that have beautiful lines, with design, no!
As mentioned, this forum is for your most outlandish and extreme speculative conspiracy theory ideas. The intent is for like-minded members to engage in collaborative discussions about these theories in an environment that embraces and encourages extreme thought.
We certainly do not want to discourage the involvement of helpful critical analysis and skeptical thought, this will always be a very important part of collaboration on ATS. However, we will be strict in managing the tone and style of such exchanges. Please keep your critical involvement to helpful focus on issues, facts, and analysis of possibilities, and do not engage in disruptive character attacks, snipes, and insults in any way. Any such activity will result in a warning and removal of your post