Has anyone explained these objects near the Sun/In Space? Looking for answers!

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 02:49 PM
link   
Have any scientists/astrophysicists/theoretical physicists given explanations for these photos?
If anyone can lead me in the right direction i'd really appreciate it, these are stunning photos.







Thank you for your help figuring these out, the sun photo in particular really left me wanting to know more...

x Robby Starbuck
twitter @robbystarbuck




posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by robbystarbuck
 


What in the hell did I just look at in picture 2 and 3? I couldn't load pic 1.......Source maybe?

Near the sun? Oh my garsh......Why even open some of these threads I ask myself? I DON'T KNOW!!!
edit on 1/18/2013 by Chrisfishenstein because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 02:56 PM
link   
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.




4) Maybe some type of entity that we know nothing about!

5) Perhaps some sort of spaceship

I'm sure Phage just accidentally over-looked those two possibilities



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 

There were only three images posted.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:22 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 




And in total between you and I we gave 5 possible answers. Seems fair.

You're not saying you know EXACTLY what they all are----are you?



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 

Yes.
Yes I am.

Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:25 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien
 

Yes.
Yes I am.

Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.



Hmmmm. "More likely" certainly doesn't contain the veracity and conviction of something that is known.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
You're not saying you know EXACTLY what they all are----are you?



Originally posted by Phage
Yes.
Yes I am.


Ok....so then you say this:


Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.


So which one is it EXACTLY, being as you "know"?

Don't get ahead of yourself there Phage or start digging holes.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by robbystarbuck
Have any scientists/astrophysicists/theoretical physicists given explanations for these photos?
If anyone can lead me in the right direction i'd really appreciate it, these are stunning photos.







Thank you for your help figuring these out, the sun photo in particular really left me wanting to know more...

x Robby Starbuck
twitter @robbystarbuck


From a ufo believer viewpoint.

1) Large spacecraft entering/exiting the sun.
2) Not fully materialized spacecraft
3) No idea.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.


I take it the earth's flat too!



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Space portal to other dimensions is the only thing I think of, when it comes to strange inamallies near the Sun. Yup....I think that's your answer.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:46 PM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 

Well, here's the original image. I would say that it is definitely crud (or a scratch) on the plate.


RA/DEC: 16 19 35, -88 43 10

The plate was exposed on October 11, 1977 at the UK Schmidt telescope in Australia. It was a 75 minute exposure.
stdatu.stsci.edu...
edit on 1/18/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Just Chris
I take it the earth's flat too!

No.
It's an oblate spheroid.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.


Thank you - now I can research Coronal Prominence. Reg. #2 I suspected the same but it same with a quote from a scientist about them being objects on a clear path but they're unsure what the objects are. Kind of vague/fishy IMO that it comes from a real scientist.

RS



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien
 

Yes.
Yes I am.

Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.



Hmmmm. "More likely" certainly doesn't contain the veracity and conviction of something that is known.




I do think it's possible it's something otherworldly. Just not a smoking gun.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.


Reg. #3 there is solid evidence it's a natural phenomenon in space that NASA/ESA don't understand yet... That's where it came from.



posted on Jan, 18 2013 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by robbystarbuck
 




Kind of vague/fishy IMO that it comes from a real scientist.

It didn't come from a real scientist.
www.abovetopsecret.com...





new topics
top topics
 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join