It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
Why is it that America can flaunt international treaties at will without repurcussion, but is the first to complaain when others do it? And then they wonder why the world hates them?
Some examples please. We withdrew from the ABM treaty becuase we could not because we broke it. The same if this into effect. Lets face it, the next race is in space and throught centuries, you are more likely to win if you hold the high ground. China is not going to space for the fun of it.
Originally posted by Rotwang
Bush administration may rethink space treaty
The US has been developing these space-borne nuclear weapons over the last ten years and if Bush withdraws from the Space Treaty than that means he either has it fully deployed or it is near fully deployed, because only an IDIOT would withdraw from the Treaty without having the weapon systems already deployed.
Originally posted by SkyFox2
Unless our intent is first strike, strike without warning, destroy the enemy before they even know we are mad at them...this is a rediculous thought.
Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by stumason
Why is it that America can flaunt international treaties at will without repurcussion, but is the first to complaain when others do it? And then they wonder why the world hates them?
Some examples please. We withdrew from the ABM treaty becuase we could not because we broke it. The same if this into effect. Lets face it, the next race is in space and throught centuries, you are more likely to win if you hold the high ground. China is not going to space for the fun of it.
Originally posted by Rotwang
Bush May Deploy Nuclear Weapons in Space
Originally posted by stumason
Why is it that America can flaunt international treaties at will without repurcussion, but is the first to complaain when others do it? And then they wonder why the world hates them?
Originally posted by vertexc
well, you say that the nuclear weapons are illegal....but you have nuclear weapons.....so....how is that.....you can have, but others not?
and what about the human rights... you are killing people in ...and irak
[edit on 28/10/04 by vertexc]
Originally posted by stumason
Why is it that America can flaunt international treaties at will without repurcussion, but is the first to complaain when others do it? And then they wonder why the world hates them?