This is what Paul said when he announced his retirement....
"I cannot stay within a service that is having the Office of Constable attacked, police officers denigrated and public safety put at risk. I will be
able to fight freely outside the service; I may be retiring but I will not stop fighting for what is right and for public safety."
For those of you not yet aware there is an attempt underway to destroy the traditional Office of Constable and replace it with a private police force.
Whatever our problems are with the British police, (some of us could write several books on the subject), a private police force would be many times
worse, serving only the 'elite' and enslaving us.
Paul was due to retire in two weeks time. He was intending to fight for the people of this land, unrestricted by the terms of his contract.
Now he's dead.
The cause of death is being given as "suspected embolism". An embolism can be caused by a directed energy weapon. Assassinations that look like
accident, suicide or natural causes are very convenient. You can never prove to your satisfaction that it was an assassination but when the timing is
so precise it is a reasonable suspicion.
This is Paul....
He was often criticized for being too nice. As faults go that's one his family can be proud of. You can see from these videos he wasn't a slim, vegan,
yoga fanatic. I expect he did suffer from some circulatory problems. It's the timing of his death that makes me suspicious. He was taken from us just
as he was about to retire and carry on his fight unrestricted by the terms of his contract.
What do you think? Does the timing make you suspicious? If it was murder it was designed to be unprovable.
Should we destroy the attempt to bring in a private police force serving only the Banksters and their criminal cronies?
I ask every interested individual reading this to take up the fight. We who have no contract can do a thousand times more.
edit on 18-1-2013 by Kester because: re-arrangement
Because the 'elite' are depending on the creation of a private police force to defend them from all those who have recognised the lies and deceit
that led to war. War gained profit for a few and suffering for many. The many want justice. The few want to enjoy their loot. Paul was about to begin
fighting in earnest after his retirement in two weeks time. He had enormous influence. If it was murder he was shut up to prevent him using his
considerable skills for the benefit of the people.
My comments in the Independent and the Telegraph both seem to have been censored. It could mean it's a touchy subject if the censors deem any
suggestion of possible foul play inappropriate.
Here is a comment from the Independent by someone called P J Lennon....
"Hmmm.....an embolism eh? Didn't this man represent the face of real opposition to the potentially disastrous changes being brought in by May. They
want to destroy ANY vestige of Public Service and want Group 4 to run the police. Remember that in the Victorian era, if you didn't have the right
insurance and your house was burning another insurance company's fire engine wouldn't put your fire out! We have to stop these vandals now!"
P J Lennon makes a very good point. A private police force will have no obligation to protect all of us, unlike the constables who swear an oath to
"cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property".
If he was "murdered" by whatever means, being the Chairman of the Police Federation surely means he has some influential friends within the Police
who are not only willing, but more than capable of uncovering foul play?
Perfectly healthy people die of embolisms all the time - what makes this so suspicious? There are far more vocal critics of Government Policy that
are still alive and kicking
Directed energy weapon? Jeebus man, talk about loony theories! There are so many other ways to quietly off a chap without resorting to exotic
weapons which don't even exist..
What the hell are you on about with your references to "destroying the Office of Constable" and instigating a "private Police force"? Please
elaborate on this idea
edit on 8/6/14 by stumason because: (no reason given)
Also, to add - as a Private citizen, if you have concerns (whether you have evidence or not) you can lodge a complaint with the Police to have it
investigated. Have you done so, or have you simply been doing the rounds on the net while adjusting the tin foil hat?
This is one of the big issues. The constables are there for us to call on when we think we need them. They don't have to be consulted, we can carry
out our own investigations and bring our own cases. They are paid, trained and have sworn an oath, but there's no obligation to involve them.
Given the obvious lack of evidence I wouldn't dream of asking them to do anything about Paul.
James Patrick, who I've covered here on ATS... www.abovetopsecret.com... www.abovetopsecret.com... As you can see, very little interest here in James, despite him being a major police
whistleblower. The spin being put on the James Patrick story is to emphasise the problems he and his family have
experienced to put off other police whistleblowers. This is why it is essential for ATS members to support James Patrick. Make his situation better
and we get more whistleblowers and therefore better future policing.
Stephen Lawrence... Here's his father's views on police privatisation... "I can tell you why it will be a disaster. If you privatise the police
force, the government is no longer responsible. It won't be about crime any more, it will be about making money."
grayee.blogspot.co.uk... He wore a Stop Police Privatisation t shirt to that conference.
There aren't too many parts to this story and many of these parts look very dubious when studied with a critical eye.
Your posts in this thread lost credibility in my eyes, when you mentioned "directed energy weapons".
We do, at least in theory, have "directed energy weapons". Even handguns would fall under this category, as the bullet delivers kinetic energy, in a
directed manner. Also lasers, microwave beam emitters. However, they all leave identifiable traces on/in the corpse. You however are claiming one that
leaves no trace. This is quite often the technique of a story teller, as such a thing can neither be proven nor disproven. As such, your theory lost
But nice try anyway. Actually, here's a link if you wanna write short scifi stories. 365tomorrows.com
a reply to: BMorris
As I've said to others. Think of a telephone fifty years ago and think of a modern smartphone. Directed energy weapons have been developed to a
similar degree. Do you know what's being developed at the top of the smartphone industry? How could you possibly know about covert weapons
development. Even if you'd worked in one part of the industry you wouldn't know what the guys in the next room were doing. Even the aircraft
designers down the road from here work like that.
I know a man who resigned after finding out what he'd been working on for years. All he got was a list of parameters within which the components he
designed had to operate. He didn't know he was designing components for... redacted. As a decent human being he was disgusted when he found out and
gave up his generous wage rather than continue. If you claim you know what is available in the way of covert energy weapons you can only be lying.
Getting shot by one would convince you but it isn't an experience I would recommend. Unless you're a whistle blower who's going to take the
Being neither provable nor disprovable is the basic requirement of deniable actions. I would have thought that was obvious.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.