It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
Completely untrue. It may be the way it is "supposed to be" ... but, they DO ask non-Masons. Every non-Mason, white male I know has been asked, one in particular is asked repeatedly on almost a weekly basis. It's like a phone solicitor that just won't take "NO" for an answer except these males are in different states and the Masons asking are not associated directly with each other.
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
Originally posted by thelongjourney
- That the freest people are those who can worship in any way they choose (or no way at all, for atheists).
- That the best way to do good is to do so where possible in secret, not because you are ashamed of your good works but so that you know you do good things because its the right thing to do instead of for outward praise or recognition.
- That the highest of human virtues is tolerance for all.
... I have no problem giving a black ball any applicant who thinks ...
1. What Are the Requirements of Becoming a Mason?
One of the primary requirements is that a man must believe in the existence of A Supreme Being. Furthermore, Freemasonry requires a Mason to believe that there is but one God.
2. I agree, a charitable act should be private.
3. Your own quote shows Masonic tolerance ... black balling applicants, and not so long ago, persons of particular races.
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
Completely untrue. It may be the way it is "supposed to be" ... but, they DO ask non-Masons. Every non-Mason, white male I know has been asked, one in particular is asked repeatedly on almost a weekly basis. It's like a phone solicitor that just won't take "NO" for an answer except these males are in different states and the Masons asking are not associated directly with each other.
Then I would strongly recommend you contact your state's Grand Lodge and apprise them of this and the city/town you live in so that they may correct this impertinent behaviour. It shouldn't be happening (if indeed it is happening)
Fitz
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Well, considering Freemasonry doesn't recruit, the only way to join is if you ask to join. Nobody's going to seek you out and invite you... you have to come to us.
Originally posted by kudegras
I was offered a chance to be nominated back in the 90's but I was too busy at the time.
I kinda wish I had of now.
Completely untrue. It may be the way it is "supposed to be" ... but, they DO ask non-Masons. Every non-Mason, white male I know has been asked, one in particular is asked repeatedly on almost a weekly basis. It's like a phone solicitor that just won't take "NO" for an answer except these males are in different states and the Masons asking are not associated directly with each other.
Originally posted by thelongjourney
1. I didn't say anything that contradicts this requirement.
2. Glad we agree.
3. I think you didn't quite read or comprehend what I stated, or this is sarcasm and I am missing it.
(or no way at all, for atheists).
Originally posted by thelongjourney
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
Completely untrue. It may be the way it is "supposed to be" ... but, they DO ask non-Masons. Every non-Mason, white male I know has been asked, one in particular is asked repeatedly on almost a weekly basis. It's like a phone solicitor that just won't take "NO" for an answer except these males are in different states and the Masons asking are not associated directly with each other.
Then I would strongly recommend you contact your state's Grand Lodge and apprise them of this and the city/town you live in so that they may correct this impertinent behaviour. It shouldn't be happening (if indeed it is happening)
Fitz
In my experience lots of people claim that masons are just driving them crazy issuing invitations, especially on the internet. I have no doubt that occasionally some mason might break the tradition and formally invite someone, but the stories are so common on the internet you'd think we were sending out custom engraved invitation to half the population. I used to look into these stories some years ago, and EVERY TIME what I found was either (1) upon further inspection the person was not telling the truth because they thought by claiming to be invited they were somehow more worthy to talk about masonry or (2) the invitations are real but coming from non-masonic groups that people seem to think have some connection to freemasonry (moose lodges, or people claiming to be masons who arent recognized).
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
But, Atheists are not allowed.
3. No sarcasm. There are two main different types of Mason. One type started allowing black people to join within the last decade or two - and the other kind left it up to the lodge's discretion.
I'm talking about the real Masonic Lodge, not the black Prince Hall and other lollipop substitutions like Eastern Star for women (who aren't even ALLOWED their own meetings without a Mason male watching over them), and their junior groups.
The local lodge, the kind that can choose whether or not to discriminate - does. No blacks allowed.
The other type also has a local lodge and they did allow a black man, so, almost all of the white males bailed out.
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
So....to make a long story short, you were perpetuating an Internet meme. Gotcha. Glad your posts are demonstrating their worth
Fitz
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
reply to post by thelongjourney
Fitzgibbon said to turn them in and I sent Fitzgibbon a list of the different locations in case he wants to turn them in and noted which one was the constant asking location one./quote]
You did, eh? Which Fitzgibbon was this? Looking in my inbox; not seeing anything. 'Sides which, why involve me? You contact the relevant Grand Lodge yourself and apprise them. Cut out the middleman and be sure your message was received. Wouldn't want anyone asserting interference by a Mason, now would we?
Fitz
Originally posted by thelongjourney
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
So....to make a long story short, you were perpetuating an Internet meme. Gotcha. Glad your posts are demonstrating their worth
Fitz
Fitz I dont understand your response...
Originally posted by thelongjourney
the stories are so common on the internet you'd think we were sending out custom engraved invitation to half the population. I used to look into these stories some years ago, and EVERY TIME what I found was either (1) upon further inspection the person was not telling the truth because they thought by claiming to be invited they were somehow more worthy to talk about masonry or (2) the invitations are real but coming from non-masonic groups that people seem to think have some connection to freemasonry (moose lodges, or people claiming to be masons who arent recognized).
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
reply to post by thelongjourney
1. Cool and starred. I thought by your OP that your believed atheists were allowed; and, I was showing you they aren't. I see you already knew that and the wording in your OP is just a bit fuzzy there.
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
You did, eh? Which Fitzgibbon was this? Looking in my inbox; not seeing anything. 'Sides which, why involve me? You contact the relevant Grand Lodge yourself and apprise them. Cut out the middleman and be sure your message was received. Wouldn't want anyone asserting interference by a Mason, now would we?
Fitz
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
You did, eh? Which Fitzgibbon was this? Looking in my inbox; not seeing anything. 'Sides which, why involve me? You contact the relevant Grand Lodge yourself and apprise them. Cut out the middleman and be sure your message was received. Wouldn't want anyone asserting interference by a Mason, now would we?
Fitz
Which one? You. My copy is still in my outbox.
'Grand', another thing for the "To Do" list. (now THAT was sarcasm )
I see, you aren't 'allowed' to do that right?
Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
reply to post by thelongjourney
1. Cool and starred. I thought by your OP that your believed atheists were allowed; and, I was showing you they aren't. I see you already knew that and the wording in your OP is just a bit fuzzy there.
3. I appreciate the honest and candid reply. That's EXACTLY the situation here.