Well, I just got done reading it. They deleted so much, it wasn't THAT much when it comes down to it. I made a few notes for highlights though, to
save people some hunting. The whole thing is worth the read though, to be sure. Much HAD been Secret/Noforn level as well, which usually means it's
several shades lighter brown than the average B.S. floating around.
Pg 56. mentioned facebook and monitoring for threats made. It specifically mentions around redactions that it's not 1st amendment covered. That
being, a threat on Facebook.
Pg. 57 is the clearest report I've read about the Portland, Maine Chem-Bomb attack on the Occupy Portland camp. A good read for those interested.
Now the next part pisses me off to no end. I was in Occupy in terms of living in camp at Occupy STL for the last part of October 2011. Communication
between camps was limited on a national basis but it existed. We never got warned and if others had been, we'd absolutely have heard about it. I
guess they'd just let some folks get shot without ever knowing the threat exieted.
Pg 61 Sniper Threat in multiple Texas cities
Pg 68 October-19 / Sniper Threat - Occupy Jacksonville camp / Jacksonville, Florida.
Now the least they can do is let targets KNOW when there is a credible threat to shoot them with sniper tactics. For the love of human decency, I
literally looked up into sniper rifles one night and in more than ONE direction. I happened to choose the one with the World Series 3 blocks away and
Michelle Obama is a World Series fan, Who knew? (shrug) Now, I get a much deeper chill though. Those could have been other people just as easily and
we'd have all just assumed cops and done nothing drastic like take cover.
There is something a bit later they could just as easily have left out and I wish they had...but it deals with a certain magazine published out of
Yemen...and how reading it can apparently make for evidence against someone. interesting on that... Hmm.. Course, I've only heard about that
magazine. Never seen one.
Pg 88 mentions reporting any Occupy related criminal activity or threats to the Iowa Fusion Center
and Pg 91 almost sounds accurate and sympathetic. Then again, Richmond had decent relations with authorities for much of the Fall protest season
too...so that one being half way honest sounds right.
Most of the rest is rumor, innuendo and so much horse manure, I don't know whether to laugh or be mad the Government is reading such things and
believing them. I never knew Occupy ..the OCCUPY people ..to be directly after the major banks. Not in a true THREAT kind of way like so much of this
is talking about. Paranoia is the word that comes to mind. Extreme paranoia.
Anyway... Hope my little summary adds to things.