Is George W Bush a uniter or divider

"I am a uniter, not a divider" "I am a uniter, not a divider" I am a uniter, not a divider" George W Bush made that statement hundreds of times during his first election campaign. The only thing that George W Bush has done with his failed policies is divide the entire world and unite all the terrorists. Does anyone out there remember that campaign slogan? Why doesn't he use that slogan now? He can't.

[edit on 10/27/2004 by LEO J]

[edit on 10/30/2004 by LEO J]

The only thing that man has done is divide the country. But I think that to be by design and not accident.

The latest poll.

49% of the country believe (with Jesus in their heart) that Bush is a uniter!

49% say divider.

That says everything.

He united us in our division.

Not to mention uniting the Sunni's and Shiites... against us.

.
cureme,

I am worried when he 'Unites the Entire World' against us.
.

Originally posted by RANT
The latest poll.

49% of the country believe (with Jesus in their heart) that Bush is a uniter!

49% say divider.

That says everything.

What about uniting most of the terrorists in one location (Iraq)?

Originally posted by LEO JWhat about uniting most of the terrorists in one location (Iraq)?

Good strategy. It makes them easier to wipe out. Of course, you have to ask yourself why the terrorists have such a vested interest in Iraq after all.

No, if the truth be known, Bush does not intend to divide this nation. People like Al Gore divide this nation, and they do it intentionally, by screaming "He LIED to us! He played upon our fears!" Jeezus, Al, I didn't know what a big wuss you really were...so afraid of everything. Good thing you lost the election.

People like Howard Dean divided this nation, by implying that Bush had prior knowledge of 9/11. Banished to his socialist state where he can jack up taxes more and more.

People like Ted Kennedy divided this nation, by calling Bush a liar nearly every day. Teddy, time to ride off into that big martini in the sky; go down to the Cape and dry out your wet brain. Your days as a Senator from Taxachusetts are numbered.

I could go on and on, but the party that boasts that it is the party of inclusion is the main dividing factor in our country.

Originally posted by jsobecky

No, if the truth be known, Bush does not intend to divide this nation. People like Al Gore divide this nation, and they do it intentionally, by screaming "He LIED to us! He played upon our fears!"

Did Bush not do that?

People like Howard Dean divided this nation, by implying that Bush had prior knowledge of 9/11.

Did not Bush know that?

People like Ted Kennedy divided this nation, by calling Bush a liar nearly every day.

Is not Bush a liar?


[edit on 29-10-2004 by Kollapse]

The population is continually kept devided to make it easier to control. It's the first chapter in the hand book for the ruling class".
A united population is strong and powerful and so a threat. Devide it and weaken it and run all over it.
Whether bush himself personaly works to those ends I'm not sure, but I am sure he understands the concepts of devide and rule.

The White House puts the cost of a single cruise missile at $800,000. The opening blitz of 320 of them launched at Baghdad cost $256 million. The price of just two of these missiles would build an entire new village for the charity SOS Children's Villages or feed 270,000 hungry people in Angola for a month.

He Lied!!!!!

And continues to lie!

Just yesterday here in Dayton he said those ammo dumps were empty BEFORE we came in. Called Kerry a liar.

He had Tommy Franks standing behind him all smug, knowing he was lying to save both of their a$ses.

Now we have evidence there was explosives there a month after we SECURED Iraq!!
Liar??????

Oh yeah, Divider!!!




[edit on 29-10-2004 by Tesla]

Originally posted by Kollapse

Originally posted by jsobecky

People like Al Gore divide this nation, and they do it intentionally, by screaming "He LIED to us! He played upon our fears!"

Did Bush not do that?

No, and unless you happen to be a US citizen living in Sweden, you should not have been concerned one way or another. You were not affected by 9/11.

Nobody that I know of had their fears "played upon". Except Al Gore.

People like Howard Dean divided this nation, by implying that Bush had prior knowledge of 9/11.

Did not Bush know that?

No he did not. And if you have solid evidence to the contrary, I suggest that you post it. I doubt that you have such evidence. No - let me state that with a bit more forcefulness - I know that you have no such evidence.

People like Ted Kennedy divided this nation, by calling Bush a liar nearly every day.

Is not Bush a liar?

Not anymore than Kennedy. Or you. Certainly not in the context that Kennedy refers to. Kennedy is an ineffective alcoholic on his way out of a disgraceful career as US Senator. He has only managed to stay at his current level for so long because of his family's influence in a small parochial state. His last gasp attempt at respectability is to align himself with Kerry. And Kerry is not a person to be aligned with, if you have any dignity.

Originally posted by Tesla
He Lied!!!!!

Just yesterday here in Dayton he said those ammo dumps were empty BEFORE we came in. Called Kerry a liar.

And your proof that the ammo was there after we arrived is ...???

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Two more bits of possible evidence surfaced Thursday in the mystery of the missing Iraqi explosives, but they appear to bolster two different scenarios as to what may have happened to the cache.

The KSTP-TV Reporter took pictures of the cache AFTER the war started!!!

Photo, video show Iraqi complex before, after invasion
Items bolster different theories on missing explosives

Friday, October 29, 2004 Posted: 5:18 AM EDT (0918 GMT)

s
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Two more bits of possible evidence surfaced Thursday in the mystery of the missing Iraqi explosives, but they appear to bolster two different scenarios as to what may have happened to the cache.

The Pentagon released a photo showing activity before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003 outside a bunker at the weapons dump where nearly 380 tons of explosives reportedly disappeared.

While the photo might lend support to but does not prove the Pentagon's theory that the high-grade explosives were moved before the war, a videotape surfaced offering another scenario.

Nine days after the fall of Baghdad, on April 18, 2003, a news crew from Minneapolis station KSTP-TV, traveling with troops from the 101st Airborne Division, entered the bunkers at al-Qaqaa, south of Baghdad. At one of the bunkers, they broke a seal to get inside, where they found barrels filled with powdered explosives, according to reporter Dean Staley.

Based on a review of the KSTP videotape, former weapons inspector David Kay told CNN late Thursday that the seal is consistent with seals used by the International Atomic Energy Agency and that the explosives in the barrel were indeed the type of high-grade explosives missing from the complex.

"That's either HMX or RDX," Kay said, referring to the types of explosives. "I don't know of anything else in al-Qaqaa that was in that form."

But Michael Lysobey, a former U.N. weapons inspector, told CNN it was unclear from the videotape whether the barrels contained the high-grade explosives.

Because al-Qaqaa was a depot for explosives, the barrels and explosives caps on the videotape are "what we would expect to see."

The explosives -- considered powerful enough to demolish buildings or detonate nuclear warheads -- were reported missing from the Al Qaqaa depot in a letter this month from the interim Iraqi government to the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency.

The Iraqi letter to the International Atomic Energy Agency, dated October 10, blamed the theft and looting of government installations on a "lack of security" during the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003. (Explosives missing)

The disappearance of the explosives has been a campaign issue since the Iraqi letter was reported Monday by The New York Times.

Democratic nominee John Kerry says the report illustrates the Bush administration's mismanagement of the war, and President Bush accuses Kerry of a "complete disregard for the facts."

[edit on 29-10-2004 by Tesla]

Originally posted by Indy
The only thing that man has done is divide the country. But I think that to be by design and not accident.

How so?...The country was divided before he was elected....hence the REAL TIGHT race in 2000...

No, and unless you happen to be a US citizen living in Sweden, you should not have been concerned one way or another. You were not affected by 9/11.

The whole world got affected by 9/11.
A swedish citizen was jailed at guantanamo (released a cuople of months ago) charged with nothing.
Bush did lie about the WMD, Al Quaida and Saddam etc.
Thats a well known fact these days.

No he did not. And if you have solid evidence to the contrary, I suggest that you post it. I doubt that you have such evidence. No - let me state that with a bit more forcefulness - I know that you have no such evidence.

There is evidence that even the FBI knew and warned CIA that something was going to happen.
MI6 of UK warned and so did the Isrealy intelligence too.
No, I cant provide any hard evidence.
But its not logic to me that they did not know that something was about to happen.

Not anymore than Kennedy. Or you. Certainly not in the context that Kennedy refers to. Kennedy is an ineffective alcoholic on his way out of a disgraceful career as US Senator. He has only managed to stay at his current level for so long because of his family's influence in a small parochial state. His last gasp attempt at respectability is to align himself with Kerry. And Kerry is not a person to be aligned with, if you have any dignity.

I agree that they all are liars.

Kollapse...the US govt gets hundreds if not thousands of threats a day...because 1 pans out doesnt mean anyone lied...hell...a lone nut could strap a bomb to his chest and blow up times square...and of course...people would blame bush...instead of the lone nut...dont you people see how twisted this has become...Al Quieda should be to blame...thats like blaming a cop for not preventing a robbery...or a teacher for a student cutting class...or a firefighter for not preventing a fire...we dont live in a perfect would...this will happen because of bad people...and the bad people should get the blame...not everyone else..why werent people this critical of clinton when the WTC got hit in 93?...

Originally posted by BasementAddix
Kollapse...the US govt gets hundreds if not thousands of threats a day...because 1 pans out doesnt mean anyone lied...hell...a lone nut could strap a bomb to his chest and blow up times square...and of course...people would blame bush...instead of the lone nut...dont you people see how twisted this has become...Al Quieda should be to blame...thats like blaming a cop for not preventing a robbery...or a teacher for a student cutting class...or a firefighter for not preventing a fire...we dont live in a perfect would...this will happen because of bad people...and the bad people should get the blame...not everyone else..why werent people this critical of clinton when the WTC got hit in 93?...

Yes I understand that there got to be a flood of threats...But I dont think MI6, FBI and Mossad "spams" the CIA etc.

I'm not shure why people was not this crital against Clinton, it might be beacuse he did not raise that much suspicion that this administration and its acts does.

Originally posted by Kollapse

Yes I understand that there got to be a flood of threats...But I dont think MI6, FBI and Mossad "spams" the CIA etc.

How many "threats" have we had since 9/11?...How many times have our bs color levels been raised?...Too many to count...how many have panned out?..none...how many have been stopped before it happened...numerous (Brooklyn Bridge and Wall Street off the top of my head)...We do get spammed...to keep us off guard...to make us complacient and believe "oh...its not for real"...or "Bush and Co is just making this up yada yada"...

Originally posted by BasementAddix

Originally posted by Kollapse

Yes I understand that there got to be a flood of threats...But I dont think MI6, FBI and Mossad "spams" the CIA etc.

How many "threats" have we had since 9/11?...How many times have our bs color levels been raised?...Too many to count...how many have panned out?..none...how many have been stopped before it happened...numerous (Brooklyn Bridge and Wall Street off the top of my head)...We do get spammed...to keep us off guard...to make us complacient and believe "oh...its not for real"...or "Bush and Co is just making this up yada yada"...

I think the 9/11 trigered a lot of nutcases, I would guess that the threats increased dramatically after 9/11. My guess is that the number of threats was a whole lot smaller prior 9/11 than after.

I highly doubt it...i believe the threat just werent public knowledge as it is today...