reply to post by RightlyCurious
I don't think you even have a grasp of what the other side believes, otherwise you wouldn't have made these statements. We are not saying that the
massacre never happened. THAT would be stupid, because the point we are trying to get across is that the event happened for a predetermined reason.
These events are no doubt really occurring, but they were not conducted entirely by those who they say are responsible. Like Oswald, it is difficult
for someone to defend themselves when they are dead, and this makes it a whole lot easier for the government, or whoever is involved, to spread their
disinformation about what occurred.
There have been at least two high-ranking officials, even a US general, that have stated it is a known fact that Israel carries out executions exactly
like this one on the children in other countries, as a warning or retaliation for some wrong they feel they were subjected to. In this case those I
mentioned suggested it was because Obama is basically giving Israel the cold shoulder, for whatever reason, while Israel is trying to garner support
to wipe Iran off the map.
I do not know what happened that day, as I was not there. But I do know that there are inconsistencies in the narration of events that were officially
released. That should not happen, and I think the crazy ones are those who simply disregard glaring inconsistencies, especially when these types of
events are being used to take away our Constitutional rights. So maybe it was Israel. Maybe it really was a certain faction within the US government.
I cannot say. But the only thing that I feel is likely is that the boy who is charged with carrying out this event on his own was basically a fall
guy. Statements given by eyewitnesses directly point to another person being in the building and shooting. So either the boy was coerced into
participating in this event, or he was taken there to make it look as if he participated in the event.
That is what I believe very well could have happened. I say this because it would explain every single one of those inconsistencies I mentioned
earlier involving the testimony of eyewitnesses. Notice how as more time passed after the event, there was less and less contradictory information
being presented via the MSM and the official record? Witnesses who said important things the day this happened are not only no longer interviewed, but
we hear absolutely nothing else about them. Years ago I would have thought I was crazy for believing something like this, but now it wouldn't
surprise me if those people who know to much against the official story already have their phones tapped and their communications and actions are
being closely watched to make sure they are not talking about going to the police or spreading the word.
This happened with many of the 9/11 witnesses, and quite a few of them turned up dead. Remember the madame running the prostitution ring? She declared
on Jones' radio program that she was NOT planning on committing suicide, and was going to fight the government, as she was armed with the truth,
having received information from very powerful people. And guess what, she was found hanging in her garage just days later. So you tell me again that
conspiracy theorists are the ones who are crazy. Read declassified government files that talk about the government's use of coercion, assassination,
terrorism, unConstitutional actions, etc., and then tell me that conspiracy theorists are the crazy ones. You can read so much information on
government abuse of power to this high degree from their own documents, so what more proof is needed to show that conspiracy theorists are in the
right for believing what they are believing. Why would you trust a government that constantly breaks its own laws and murders its own citizens when
they are in a position to expose their lying and illegal activities?