posted on Jan, 19 2013 @ 01:12 AM
Originally posted by Newagekid2012
I always found that arguing because of conflicting viewpoints actually generates some great info. Especially when you have those people that just
link articles back and forth to further their arguments.
But so few do 'link articles' to support their viewpoint. Most just 'yell' what they believe without and reason or thought without any
A civil (I repeat civil) argument, with supported arugments and limited scope, does, in fact, does serve the interests of growth and understanding.
Most of the so-called arguments I see on ATS and I'm new are just people screaming - you're wrong, I'm right, you're an idiot and that is not