It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chopperswolf
reply to post by Guenter
Wild boars are encroaching on our livestock and croplands where i live. they are classified as outlaw quadrupeds, and can be hunted day or night with no limit. I wouldn't want to go stalking a herd of wild pigs with a single shot, a double, or even a drilling, they have been known to kill grown cows and eat them around here. you might need more than three bullets, and not because you are a lousy marksman.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by zayonara
"The right to bear arms" does not read "The right to bear arms that your government says you can bear." Simple as that. No more, no less, no foaming.edit on 16-1-2013 by zayonara because: (no reason given)
They didn't even HAVE assault weapons when the 'government' wrote the Constitution.
So if Tesla technology ever comes to the market-place you mean you should have a choice of that too?
Greediness and simple-mindedness make for scary Americans.
You.Don't.Need.Assault.Weapons. ....and you can't always get what you want. So get over it.
edit on 16-1-2013 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Most of the "dudes" on this site want to pump massive amounts of bullets into you should you enter their property at night. Serious amounts of firepower! Multipul rounds per second, smashing and pulverising bone and sinew. They gotta make sure the job is done and make sure it's massive overkill with lots of manly noise!
Seems a simple single bullet is not required anymore.edit on 16-1-2013 by CaptainBeno because: Stuff.............bad.
Originally posted by POPtheKlEEN89
Well Obama has fully revealed his position, now if congress acts in favor of his laws i would like to know what liberties you will be losing and why you feel that way.
I am generally interested in hearing your personal views on how these laws will affect your individual liberty, so far i haven't been able to stomach this debate no matter where i see or hear it, so indulge me with an intelligent response giving me your reasons for or against the looming assault weapons ban.
Keep it civil, if you foam at the mouth please clean up after yourself.
Originally posted by POPtheKlEEN89
Well Obama has fully revealed his position, now if congress acts in favor of his laws i would like to know what liberties you will be losing and why you feel that way.
I am generally interested in hearing your personal views on how these laws will affect your individual liberty, so far i haven't been able to stomach this debate no matter where i see or hear it, so indulge me with an intelligent response giving me your reasons for or against the looming assault weapons ban.
Keep it civil, if you foam at the mouth please clean up after yourself.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
It's a continuation loss of liberty that we have all already lost.
Time to stop supporting prohibition in all it's forms.
Dont take a step back just because it's a thing you dont like.
Supporting any prohibition is supporting all prohibition.edit on 17-1-2013 by thisguyrighthere because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
It's a continuation loss of liberty that we have all already lost.
Time to stop supporting prohibition in all it's forms.
Dont take a step back just because it's a thing you dont like.
Supporting any prohibition is supporting all prohibition.edit on 17-1-2013 by thisguyrighthere because: (no reason given)
Recreational drugs are prohibited. Firearms are regulated. I don't see any of you liberty defenders waving your guns around in defiance to support the rights of people to get high in their leisure time.