List your miracles, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 18-1-2013 @ 08:07 PM by stupid girl
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to
post by BlueMule





one has to presume that one has great understanding of God (and by extension miracles)


Who (or whom, I never get those words right) has even a little insight of god, never mind a great understanding? Ask ten believers and they'll all give you different (great) understandings of god. And, isn't this a problem in and of itself? If there is a god, wouldn't you think he'd want everyone to at least grasp what He's all about?


Hence the quote I provided earlier by Joseph Campbell. The way to gain an understanding of God is through comparative religion, comparative mythology, and comparative mysticism. That's the way to gain a panoramic cross-cultural view... a wide view that transcends the dogma of local, exoteric layers of religion.

Spend a decade studying the scholarly comparative fields and having mystical / paranormal experiences as I have, and yes you will get a little insight of God.


I spent 8 years in "scholarly" studies of comparison and analysis of world religions and their effect on the human psyche and societal structures of mankind, and that wasn't even my major.
Mystical and paranormal experiences are purely subjective to the participant(s) and cannot be used as a realistic standard of measurement for much of anything, faith based, or otherwise.
One thing I have learned is the humility to acknowledge the fact that no human being can even begin to know the mind of God, nor understand His ways.
God does want us to know Him, very much so. But first we must empty our cup of opinion and speculation before He can fill it with new wine. We must also come to terms with dying to ourselves and trusting the fact that the wine must be His and the cup must be filled His way. Ouch. That pride thing just won't go away.


reply posted on 18-1-2013 @ 10:43 PM by jiggerj
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to
post by BlueMule





one has to presume that one has great understanding of God (and by extension miracles)


Who (or whom, I never get those words right) has even a little insight of god, never mind a great understanding? Ask ten believers and they'll all give you different (great) understandings of god. And, isn't this a problem in and of itself? If there is a god, wouldn't you think he'd want everyone to at least grasp what He's all about?


Hence the quote I provided earlier by Joseph Campbell. The way to gain an understanding of God is through comparative religion, comparative mythology, and comparative mysticism. That's the way to gain a panoramic cross-cultural view... a wide view that transcends the dogma of local, exoteric layers of religion.

Spend a decade studying the scholarly comparative fields and having mystical / paranormal experiences as I have, and yes you will get a little insight of God.

edit on 18-1-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)


Why is it that studying comparative fields gives one an insight into god, but looking at the mess all over the world, and all through history doesn't?



reply posted on 19-1-2013 @ 08:41 AM by BlueMule
Originally posted by stupid girl
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to
post by BlueMule





one has to presume that one has great understanding of God (and by extension miracles)


Who (or whom, I never get those words right) has even a little insight of god, never mind a great understanding? Ask ten believers and they'll all give you different (great) understandings of god. And, isn't this a problem in and of itself? If there is a god, wouldn't you think he'd want everyone to at least grasp what He's all about?


Hence the quote I provided earlier by Joseph Campbell. The way to gain an understanding of God is through comparative religion, comparative mythology, and comparative mysticism. That's the way to gain a panoramic cross-cultural view... a wide view that transcends the dogma of local, exoteric layers of religion.

Spend a decade studying the scholarly comparative fields and having mystical / paranormal experiences as I have, and yes you will get a little insight of God.


I spent 8 years in "scholarly" studies of comparison and analysis of world religions and their effect on the human psyche and societal structures of mankind, and that wasn't even my major.


“Theologians may quarrel, but the mystics of the world speak the same language.” -Meister Eckhart

Who teaches them that same language in age after age, culture after culture, religion after religion?

A ghostly spirit of... coincidence?

Have you learned how to speak that same language? Forgive me but it doesn't look like you have... yet.

Mystical and paranormal experiences are purely subjective to the participant(s) and cannot be used as a realistic standard of measurement for much of anything, faith based, or otherwise.


Realistic standard of measurement? What does that even mean?

One thing I have learned is the humility to acknowledge the fact that no human being can even begin to know the mind of God, nor understand His ways.


Speak for yourself.

God does want us to know Him, very much so. But first we must empty our cup of opinion and speculation before He can fill it with new wine. We must also come to terms with dying to ourselves and trusting the fact that the wine must be His and the cup must be filled His way. Ouch. That pride thing just won't go away.


But I have died (more than once). That's when I was united with the Godhead. My cup was emptied even of myself.

"In mysticism that love of truth which we saw as the beginning of all philosophy leaves the merely intellectual sphere, and takes on the assured aspect of a personal passion. Where the philosopher guesses and argues, the mystic lives and looks; and speaks, consequently, the disconcerting language of first-hand experience, not the neat dialectic of the schools. Hence whilst the Absolute of the metaphysicians remains a diagram —impersonal and unattainable—the Absolute of the mystics is lovable, attainable, alive." -Evelyn Underhill, Mysticism

Have you read that book by Evelyn?

edit on 19-1-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-1-2013 @ 09:21 AM by stupid girl
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Originally posted by stupid girl
One thing I have learned is the humility to acknowledge the fact that no human being can even begin to know the mind of God, nor understand His ways.
God does want us to know Him, very much so.


So I was reading your post when I got to this part. If no human can begin to know what god thinks then how are you claiming to know that god wants us to know him? You say it so confidently, almost like you KNOW that's what god's thinking. But.... no one can begin to know what he thinks, so what gives?


That is an insightful and clever question. I would like to answer it, but like my previous reply, I am a bit leery of further hijacking Jigg's thread and steering us into the abyss of personal faith and understanding and away from the simple relation of personal miracles.
However, since your question is brief and does not require such in-depth discussion as my reply to the previous posts, I will take the chance and share with you my understanding as succinctly as possible. I will U2U my additional comments and explanation of my answer
The short answer to your question is no, I have no idea what God is thinking, nor was it my intent to purport such a thing.
So, although I stand by my understanding that no human can begin to know the mind of God, we can know what He chooses to reveal to us according to our capabilities of comprehension as His creation. And since I consider myself a person of the Christian faith, I believe that God's revelation to us of Himself throughout Biblical scripture is trustworthy. Therefore, based on that faith, I feel confident in His desire to know us because He said so Himself.
God's will and desires are not mysteries we cannot understand because He seeks to reveal them to us. However, no man can know what I'm thinking unless I tell him, so much so are we unable to know what God is thinking unless He tells us.


reply posted on 19-1-2013 @ 10:04 AM by stupid girl
Originally posted by BlueMule

“Theologians may quarrel, but the mystics of the world speak the same language.” -Meister Eckhart

Who teaches them that same language in age after age, culture after culture, religion after religion?

A ghostly spirit of... coincidence?

Have you learned how to speak that same language? Forgive me but it doesn't look like you have... yet.


It is apparent that we do not speak the same language, Sir. Therefore I see any further discussion on the language you are referring to as an unfruitful endeavor.

Realistic standard of measurement? What does that even mean?


A quantity or quality against which others are judged, measured or compared that can be reasonably universally accepted.

Speak for yourself.


I do my best to maintain such a standard.

But I have died (more than once). That's when I was united with the Godhead. My cup was emptied even of myself.
"In mysticism that love of truth which we saw as the beginning of all philosophy leaves the merely intellectual sphere, and takes on the assured aspect of a personal passion. Where the philosopher guesses and argues, the mystic lives and looks; and speaks, consequently, the disconcerting language of first-hand experience, not the neat dialectic of the schools. Hence whilst the Absolute of the metaphysicians remains a diagram —impersonal and unattainable—the Absolute of the mystics is lovable, attainable, alive." -Evelyn Underhill


I give no value to mysticism, mystics, nor their wordy yet vacuous quotes. I apologize if that seems offensive, but I have long since moved past the vanity of placing my faith in my education and making it my religion.

Have you read that book by Evelyn?


No, Sir, I have not. Thank you for asking, but in all honesty, it is more than likely not something that I would be interested in reading. However, I will take the time to briefly look over the context since you took the time to suggest it.


reply posted on 19-1-2013 @ 05:29 PM by jiggerj
reply to post by Thought Provoker





That non-instinctive reaction [ducking] saved my life.


Why do you consider this reaction as non-instinctive? I've done it several times.


reply posted on 19-1-2013 @ 07:23 PM by Thought Provoker
reply to post by jiggerj


I thought it was self-evident. That isn't a reaction someone should have. Someone should move to the side, or at least take a look before doing anything. That would be "instinctive." What I did was not instinctive, and if I had reacted instinctively, I'd be dead now. Answered?


reply posted on 19-1-2013 @ 07:57 PM by jiggerj
Originally posted by Thought Provoker
reply to
post by jiggerj


I thought it was self-evident. That isn't a reaction someone should have. Someone should move to the side, or at least take a look before doing anything. That would be "instinctive." What I did was not instinctive, and if I had reacted instinctively, I'd be dead now. Answered?


Sorry, no. We hear a loud boom and we either completely duck or pull our head down <-- sometimes to the point of spraining our necks. It is completely natural and instinctive.


reply posted on 23-1-2013 @ 11:44 AM by QuantumSeeker
al-furqan.5u.com... .. .
Do you think the lung issue is a good claim?.. .it seems quite impressive.. .
edit on 23-1-2013 by QuantumSeeker because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Belief in God/Jesus through Personal experiences.
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
What was God doing before "In the beginning"?
  Posted 14 days ago with 9 member flags
Stay Out Of HELL.
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
Do Christians really want to Start World War 3?
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags
My Hopeful Reintroduction to God
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags