Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Obama admits "All all assault on Liberty" gun ban!

page: 1
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:42 PM
link   
Today at the White House, Mr Barack Hussein Obama, let's the cat out of the bag during a press conference. He states,"Politicians… publicly warning of a tyrannical all assault on Liberty, Not because that’s true..” He Doesn't say, "Not because that’s Not True." Therefore he admits that there IS an all assault on Liberty!!!
There you have it, straight from his mouth. Watch the video at 17:30!!!!!!!!!!!!!
edit on 16-1-2013 by Violater1 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:47 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:48 PM
link   
Here is the summary:


Here are the main objectives of the President's plan:

1. Close background check loopholes to keep guns out of dangerous hands;

2. Ban military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines;

3. Make schools safer; and

4. Increase access to mental health services.

www.shakesville.com...

A full transcript of the President's and Vice President's remarks is available here.



edit on 16-1-2013 by Murgatroid because: Added link



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:50 PM
link   
I think maybe he does admit it. You know that he knows exactly what it is.




Looks like Obama is taking Rahmbo's advice.



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:50 PM
link   
All this while crazy Joe, behind him, nods his head in agreement while smirking. I bet Nancy Pulolicei was jumping up in down, applauding like a Kalifornia seal.



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


You took that way wrong. He was talking about pro-gun people.

There will be pundits, lobyists, claiming an all out assault on weapons...


Look, I am for the 2nd as much as the next person, but I think you are mistaken on this one.

Sorry. :\



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Murgatroid
I'll put a link to the transcript in a minute, can't handle any more lies...


Please provide a couple of links to your source. If not, just listen for yourself.



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by Violater1
 


You took that way wrong. He was talking about pro-gun people.

There will be pundits, lobyists(sic), claiming an all out assault on weapons...


Look, I am for the 2nd as much as the next person, but I think you are mistaken on this one.

Sorry. :\


No your wrong. Listen again.



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to post by Violater1
 


I hope someone unleashes an all out assault on him #ing tyrant.




Are you calling for the assassination of the POTUS?

Really?



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


Very good catch.

NOTHING is said by a politician by "accident".



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:55 PM
link   
"Not because that’s Not True" is a double negative I think your getting your wording mixed up a bit here...




posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:56 PM
link   
It is an all out assault by pundits and special interests:

Obama,Biden, and all their supporters that gun control measures is the same crap they have been trying to get passed for the last 40 years;.

They will not stop they will not yield until only the government and police have all the guns the current regime in power is the antithesis of liberalism and it is the epitome of totalitarianism.



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Violater1
Please provide a couple of links to your source. If not, just listen for yourself.

I can't bear to listen to ANY more lies from politicians...

I feel polluted and disgusted just listening to them, which is WHY the transcript link.

Am I the ONLY one here that feels that way?


'I can't stand to hear his voice any more. He's a liar and worse.' ~ Caroline Kennedy






edit on 16-1-2013 by Murgatroid because: I felt like it..



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


Hes an idiot. I really cant deal with this anymore



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


Obama just woke a sleeping giant.



"What's for breakfast?"



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Violater1

Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by Violater1
 


You took that way wrong. He was talking about pro-gun people.

There will be pundits, lobyists(sic), claiming an all out assault on weapons...


Look, I am for the 2nd as much as the next person, but I think you are mistaken on this one.

Sorry. :\


No your wrong. Listen again.


I did. He said, "Not because that's true"


He was talking about getting laws passed, "it will be difficult"

Then he went on about pro-gun people and tyrrany, then, "Not because that's true"


I think it IS true! But he didn't say it. We just have to disagree on this.


The crap will hit the fan with DiFi's bill. Right now, he is in nothing but campaign mode. How many times have we seen it?



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by roughycannon
"Not because that’s Not True" is a double negative I think your getting your wording mixed up a bit here...




I believe you are wrong.
From
www.grammar-monster.com...
"A double negative is usually produced by combining the negative form of verb (e.g., cannot, did not, have not) with a negative pronoun (e.g., nothing, nobody), a negative adverb (e.g., never, hardly) or a negative conjunction (e.g., neither/nor)."
Mr Obama meant what he said.



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 03:03 PM
link   


This will be difficult. There will be pundits and
politicians and special interest lobbyists publicly
warning of a tyrannical all- out assault on liberty,
not because that's true, but because they want to
gin up fear or higher ratings or revenue for
themselves. And behind the scenes, they'll do
everything they can to block any commonsense
reform and make sure nothing changes
whatsoever.


www.foxnews.com...
edit on 16-1-2013 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


here's whats on the menu de jour:




posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Murgatroid
 


So if he did numbers 1 & 4 basically keeping nutters and guns as far away as possible there would be no need for the rest of it and job done and number 4's the main one...less nutters = less shootings and number 1 just makes sure no one gives a known number 4 a gun and while not perfect (and nothing ever will be) it'll catch the majority.





new topics

top topics



 
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join