I get the picture, but it is not fooling anyone.
Preaching to the Choir here, most on ATS understands these thing, which is good.
edit on 16-1-2013 by gangdumstyle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by gangdumstyle
I think you misunderstood the entire point of the Onion's piece.
That's ok though, a lot of people have a hard time with veiled social commentary.
It's not about American intervening, it's about setting your priorities as to what is important in your media. The golden globes should carry far less weight then a gun legislation debate, or an international crisis that your country was involved in.
~Tenthedit on 1/16/2013 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)
veiled social commentary
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by tothetenthpower
veiled social commentary
Isn't that just code either
a, being so pretentious and talking in codes like a 7 year old.
or
b, not having the balls to come out and say what you really think because it might offend
If you can justify your commentary, then the person it offends is wrong. If you have to hide or disguise it. Then it's bet not said.
simples