One trick most liars..opps, sorry, typo....lawyers do when they file charges to sue the defendent is to LAY ON SEVERAL MORE charges to the supposed
crime, so that if 22 other charges do not work or accepted by the jury and judge, at least, under the law of propability, one will stick.
Same with President Obama's style of 23 executive orders/actions, so that if 22 of the other EO/EA fails or is meaningless, feel good measures, at
least one of them will stick.
And the real one whom he wants stick is the assualt weapon ban, displayed in full unconscionably using innocent children to bring about support.
Had it been an M16 assualt rifle that killed the children in Sandy Hook, as well as in other crimes, or an insane killer that did it? The answer is
1. The dirty minority but loud anti-gun lobby claimed assualt weapons kill quicker. That's BS. That is one big weapon and could have been noticed
easily and forewarned. A small and simple matchstick lighted with leaked gas cannisters from a bag would easily have killed far more. It is the
insane or the criminal that is a problem, not the tool used.
2. The dirty minority but loud anti-gun lobby claimed that men 200 years ago, their qoutes and their laws are irrelevant to the issues we modern man
face today which are far more complex. That's another BS. Without these 'old men' and their sacrifice to create a new set of laws, there would have
been no USA and many speaking german today.
It is the ESSENCE of those laws, the reasons why they were created, that remains relevant today, for they are based upon centuries of studies and
experiences with human nature.
Today, the dirty anti-gun lobby claimed that gun enthusiasts are conspiracy theorists with their nutjob tales of black helicopters, MIB, and whatnots
being the reason to have guns.
Try telling the anti-gun rhetoric to the suffering Syrians, the Libyans, the Chinese and the yet to be freed Iranians about being conspiracy
theorists, and see what they will get as response, if they get to be alive still for calling them conspiracy theoriests.
Today, USA seems safe and President Obama seems benevolent. But what about tomorrow? Can the anti-gun lobbyists foretell tomorrow will be safe? Once
laws are casted in stone, it is very difficult, if not impossible to change or have the time to do so.
Are the majority americans to listen and be allowed to be ruled by mickey mouse fan club members, deviod of realities and pragmatism?
3. Weapons are the responsiblity of owners. If one or 2 fails in responsibility, left them unlocked for others to steal or use, are the 200 million
gun owners be blamed and punished?
4. Had all those EO/EA promised that it will end gun violence, let alone other forms of violence, upon american men, women and children, as now, only
the committed insane and criminals who obey no laws will have illegal guns while law abidding citizens do not? None.
It seems either President Obama had been dishonest, acting upon some unknown selfish agenda, or he is plain dumb. But he had never proven himself
dumb, thus it leaves one to wonder on his integrity now - who is he, a popularly elected executive, acting for, to demand for assualt weapon ban,
which is a DIRECT INFRINGEMENT upon the 2nd amendment ????
However, let us all stay calm. President Obama is still the elected President and leader. It is his and his advisors' plan, although it may seem
stupid and unworkable, but we mortals are all flawed anyway, for none of us are perfect.
Let it work its way through Congress and the Supreme Court. If any survives, let it work out at least for one year and see if VIOLENCE is eradicated.
If not, it is still not too late to sue, charge and sentence hanging for the anti-gun lobbyists for the slaughter of innocent law abidding citizens
devoid of protections, as those anti gun nuts are responsible for pinning violence upon guns and that by removing them from law abidding citizens,
violence and need for national defence will be eradicated. But may it not be too late....
edit on 16-1-2013 by SeekerofTruth101 because: (no