It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Superhans
True story, I got 90,000 dollars from vaccine court. Srssly
Originally posted by Skywatcher2011
Originally posted by Superhans
True story, I got 90,000 dollars from vaccine court. Srssly
Pictures of court winning documents, or your claim never happened
Originally posted by alkali
Of course there are risks associated with vaccines, hence the "risks" section within the vaccine information sheets provided by the CDC. No one is trying to hide that. However, there isn't one peer-reviewed study that links vaccines with autism.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
It is pretty well known that some kids do get bad reactions to vaccines.
but not nearly as many as have "bad reactions" to the diseases themselves - this is 2 children over many years - whereas measles in eth US used to cause up to 4000 cases of encephalitis (which is what is wrong with the boy) EVERY YEAR - and that 500 of those might DIE. Even as late as 2000 the death rate from measles in the US was 3 per 1000 cases. In places with lower living standards the rate of death can be 10%
I am sorry for the parents of these children and happy they ar receiving financial aid.
But I am happy for the parents of the 100,000 or more children who have not had to suffer anything at all from measles, mumps and whooping cough in the last few decades as a result of vaccines.
To want to ban vaccines because of cases like this is effectively the same as wanting to ban motor vheicles or stair cases because of fatal acidents on them!
Originally posted by alkali
Of course there are risks associated with vaccines, hence the "risks" section within the vaccine information sheets provided by the CDC. No one is trying to hide that. However, there isn't one peer-reviewed study that links vaccines with autism.
Originally posted by Narcissous
reply to post by burntheships
let us say I have aspergers and have been vaccinated in my life, but I dont live in the US. can I sue people for it?
And how can I prove that vaccinations caused this?
Originally posted by thebtheb
Actually there are several. But since the government and the vaccine makers have not accepted them, the official word is that there are "no correlations." Everyone believes them, and their case rests. Meanwhile, the actual studies exist. Their denial by above mentioned organizations does nothing to discredit these studies in reality except deny them - which works!
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by burntheships
Eating 2 cans of tuna in a week means that is atleast 62 micrograms of mercury.. only 20% of that enters your blood. There is 12 micrograms of Thimerisol in a hep b vaccine. This preservitive is excreted from your body 3x faster than natural mercury.
These are the facts... now use them however you want.
Originally posted by thebtheb
Many doctors will agree that the tuna mercury and the directly injected thimerisol are of no comparison. More toxiic mercury will be delivered to your body and brain via the injection. Case pretty well closed.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
reply to post by thebtheb
Intramuscular injections of thimerosal are very rapidly removed through the stool. You can say all you want about "bypassing the body's natural defenses," but your body works better than you think it does, and enterohepatic excretion means your fear of thimerosal ends in a big pile of crap.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by burntheships
From the huffington post article
The government did not admit that vaccines caused autism, at least in one of the children. Both cases were "unpublished," meaning information is limited, and access to medical records and other exhibits is blocked. Much of the information presented here comes from documents found at the vaccine court website.
Meaning much of the information is from a 3rd party website. The awarded damages had nothing to do with autism.
Its horrible that things like this can happen. My heart goes out to these people who were obviously harmed by the vaccines they recieved. Untill a better method of immunization comes out, which it will eventually, it is probable that things like this can happen. This is why these funds exist to cover any potential harm in this field of medicine... just like the malpractice insurance a surgeon has incase he makes a mistake.
These children got encephalitis and no one noticed for almost a week. That is how all the damage occured. This is why it took so long to get through the courts, because people couldnt understand how the parents of these children didnt see the symptoms for several days. In the end we know parents are not doctors and if their chilren happen to catch some strange illness from a hospital that is certainly the hospitals fault. This is why they won their case
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by burntheships
Eating 2 cans of tuna in a week means that is atleast 62 micrograms of mercury.. only 20% of that enters your blood. There is 12 micrograms of Thimerisol in a hep b vaccine. This preservitive is excreted from your body 3x faster than natural mercury.
These are the facts... now use them however you want.
This graph shows what happens when a 75 kg (165 pound) person drinks 5 ounces of 100 proof moonshine containing 60 gramsof ethanol. You can see that it takes more than an hour for it to all get absorbed and for the BAC (blood alcohol content) to peak. Then it takes 5 or 6 hours for the liver to eliminate all of that alcohol. You can also see that food in the stomach slows down the absorption rate and the height of the peak. This alcohol calculator shows approximately the same effect.
Now let’s say that instead of drinking the alcohol, you inject pure ethanol straight into a vein [**]. For example, say you inject 2.5 ounces of ethanol (the amount of alcohol in 5 ounces of 100 proof moonshine) right into the bloodstream. The big difference is the time. Instead of it taking an hour for the alcohol to absorb, the alcohol is all there instantly. That’s 60 grams of alcohol straight into a bloodstream containing approximately 5 liters (5,000 grams) of blood. There will be a moment or two where the blood alcohol concentration is 60 / 5,000 – a toxic, possibly fatal level – before that alcohol diffuses into the water and fat of the entire body and falls by a factor of 10 to 60 / 50,000 [***].
So to answer your question, there really isn’t any chemical difference between drinking and injecting alcohol. In both cases you have ethanol molecules flowing in the bloodstream. But there is a big time difference. And because of the time difference you would need to be extremely careful in the amount injected. A mistake could be fatal. It would be good to apply the “don’t try this at home” rule.
read more at blogs.howstuffworks.com...