It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Obama to unveil gun control plan within the hour

page: 10
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in


posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 05:32 PM
reply to post by ShaeTheShaman

It's all a big reality show.

Unfortunately, he was not chosen to be voted off the island, nor was he the last team to arrive.

I sincerely hope he is not... The biggest loser, but he is working hard at it.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 05:32 PM

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 05:33 PM

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Originally posted by TDawgRex
Why are people applauding at a press conference?

Quote from Star Wars ....
"So this is how liberty dies ... to the sound of applause .... "

Yep and that's exactly how I felt when the loonies in the south were booing Ron Paul for quoting the Golden Rule and cheering for more wars and liberties being stripped away.

Edit: In fact, I used that quote quite often in my mind during the 2012 election..Americans don't want to be free anymore.
edit on 16-1-2013 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 05:38 PM
The plan is in place and the rest is simple...

Use Obamacare to gather records and put ANYONE and EVERYONE who EVER took
medication for ANY mental health reason on a list and BAN THEM from having firearms.

Of course, this would include almost everyone. Anyone who ever was prescribed a
sedative or something for anxiety, or one of any of a plethora of newly
diagnosed "special" diseases with acronymic names like ADD....just run the gamut
from aspirin on down and soon we are ALL disallowed from owning firearms....

Once again....

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

What part of that allows for any equivocation.

This action is not simply impeachable--it is treason

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 05:46 PM
Is it possible that all of the reports of our recent war veterans and active millitary suicide rates are being used to build a foundation to find these heroes "mentally unfit/unsound" to own a weapon in civilian life?

If I wanted to disarm a populace, my first move would be to bar those who are highly skilled and trained from obtaining weapons or retaining them.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 05:57 PM
This is what is wrong with america.........

so third party debate is shown by small networks and only a few million are awake enough to know about it.

that means 1.6% voted for neither democrat or republican in 2012 election.

everyone else does not know about libertarians, greens, constitutionalists, socialists, communists OR thinks they are evil radical fanatics. america loses and so does rest of the world! more zionism, more big business shilling, more outsourcing, more unemployment and welfare, more wars, eventual collapse!

There was a video of gary johnson chuckling when asked what he would do differently than obama and romney, but i can't find it. It was on cnn I think. He could not believe the severity of the host's ignorance or shilling.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 06:02 PM
reply to post by rival

Technically it doesn't even have to be the individual who owns the firearm. It would only need to be someone residing under the same roof. They've applied this rule to felons and domestic abuse situations in many states in the past.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 06:19 PM
reply to post by Surfrat

I keep hearing this Nazi Germany reference to gun control.

Yes the Nazi's started a gun registry, no the average citizen didn't lose their rights. They did eventually, but the registry was just that a registry, then there was a no guns for jews, then it moved on to harsher restrictions.

What Obama Proposed today is in no #ing way close to Nazi germany. I'm really getting tired of hearing it to. Go boo hoo all you want, it's actually looking like this is a reality, he signed the executive orders, I watched it live this morning. Up to you guys now.

No Assault Weapons, Universal Back ground Checks, No magazines over 10 rounds, and 20 other orders. Good luck kiddos, if your daddy wouldn't listen to you cry, why should I? You're all big boys and girls now.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 06:22 PM
reply to post by rival

It's the NRA that wants to do that, not obama mate. The Government would like you to take meds when you own guns. For the Gubberment it's the ones that aren't all hopped up on the medications that frighten them.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 07:15 PM
reply to post by rival

Is there anyone in your household on psychotropic meds? Are your children on adderall, ritalin, one of the many anti-depressants poison pills the medical docters are handing out with abandon?

Sleeping pills? Ambien? Pain pills?

How many vets are they going to go after for psychotropic meds?

Maybe people will wake up and stop taking this poison from their docters.

This is what obamacare looks like. This is the real reason they shoved it down our throats.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 07:35 PM

Originally posted by SpaDe_

Originally posted by ChesterJohn

Q. what arms do we need to fight off and invading military force or our own tyrannical govt forces?

A. The same as they have. which would include helicopters, war planes, missiles and rocket launchers, automatic weapons and 30 to 50 round clips and more. Night vision, smart bullets, drones, 50 Cal machine guns, War ships, Tanks and what ever other arms we will need to throw of any tyrannical govt whether foreign or domestic

edit on 16-1-2013 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)

Actually I think the guerilla forces in Afghanistan would beg to differ. They have successfully waged a guerilla campaign against arguably the most advanced military force on the planet. They do not have aircraft, night vision, drones, war ships, or many of the other things that our military has, but yet they held their ground.

Never underestimate the resolve of a people to defend their home.

They are experienced and trained while many Americans are not. but we still have the right to bear arms of which we have been banned to even bear them as needed.

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 07:41 PM
Now we can see Bearing Arms is not about letting the enemy or possible enemy know where and who has the guns, ammo, warplans cannons, Tanks etc.

The government is not supposed to be regulating Arms that we need to bear in case we need to throw off a tyrannical Govt foreign or domestic.

We gave up our rights to long ago and it would seem we will never get it back without an peaceful or non-peaceful rebellion.

to see a possible peaceful process by which we can do this go to
edit on 16-1-2013 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)

posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 08:28 PM
Please add your comments to one of the other threads on this topic with fully developed OPs:

Thread closed

edit on 1/16/2013 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)

edit on 1/16/2013 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)

top topics

<< 7  8  9   >>

log in