OK guys and gals settle down.
The Constitution of the US does not need to be reinforced by the States. It exists and should be enough on it's own. If it gets to the stage where
'We the people' have to act then you are at the stage of 'the blood of patriots.' Interestingly, those type of passages regarding bloodshed being
required never seem to mention trials of the Tyrannical rulers. Just bloodshed seems to cover it all. LOL.
Associated thread is
and a great thread it is.
Missouri enacted a new law which in part says:
Any official, agent, or employee of the federal government who enforces or
attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the federal
government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is owned
or manufactured commercially or privately in the state of Missouri and that remains
exclusively within the borders of the state of Missouri shall be guilty of a class D felony.
Now that is great, but, I think it is the wrong type of law. A much better law would have been:
Any President, Congressman, official, agent, or employee of the federal government who enforces or
attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the federal government that in any way whatsoever infringes or attempts to
infringe on the Constitution of the United States of America or any part or amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and enters
within the borders of the state of Missouri shall be arrested and charged with a crime against the fabric of Democracy and must be charged with a
class D felony.
You can not continue to handle this in piecemeal fashion. Once you enact this law then it is up to the State's Judges to decide the fate of the
accused - as it should be.
edit on 16/1/2013 by pheonix358 because: edit
edit on 16/1/2013 by pheonix358 because: error