It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
LOL - The FED announced it will take seven years for the German's to get their gold.
www.zerohedge.com...
Germany wants their gold holdings repatriated to home soil. They have asked the French to return all of their gold, at a rate of 50 tonnes per year until all 374 metric tonnes are received. The French have just commenced military operations in Mali. Mali is Africa's third largest gold producer. Mali, this past year, increased its gold production by just over 50 metric tonnes. Is anyone else seeing the connection here? I'm willing to bet that France does not have Germany's gold and the Bundesbank has given them a few years to mine it from Mali. Yet the Mali source must be secure, hence the military must make sure the gold flows.
Originally posted by Surfrat
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" ~Adolph Hitler, 1935,on The Weapons Act of Nazi Germany
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by spyder550
This sounds a wee less conspiratorial
But the central bank came under pressure last year when Germany's independent Federal Auditors' Office last year concluded it failed to properly oversee its gold reserves. The auditor suggested the central bank should carry out regular inspections of the gold held abroad to verify its book value or change the reserves' management. The auditors' report stunned Germany, where the Bundesbank routinely tops polls of the nation's most trusted institutions. The central bank was taken aback and maintained it didn't see the need for more scrutiny in overseeing the reserves, saying "there is no doubt about the integrity of the foreign storage sites."
www.huffingtonpost.com...
I tend to go with the less hair on fire stuff -- just me and Occam
What do you mean by less conspiratorial? There is no conspiracy it is well known the dollar is on life support. You think them wanting 200 billion in gold back in their hands is just a result of an management audit and nothing more?...
Originally posted by spyder550
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by spyder550
This sounds a wee less conspiratorial
But the central bank came under pressure last year when Germany's independent Federal Auditors' Office last year concluded it failed to properly oversee its gold reserves. The auditor suggested the central bank should carry out regular inspections of the gold held abroad to verify its book value or change the reserves' management. The auditors' report stunned Germany, where the Bundesbank routinely tops polls of the nation's most trusted institutions. The central bank was taken aback and maintained it didn't see the need for more scrutiny in overseeing the reserves, saying "there is no doubt about the integrity of the foreign storage sites."
www.huffingtonpost.com...
I tend to go with the less hair on fire stuff -- just me and Occam
What do you mean by less conspiratorial? There is no conspiracy it is well known the dollar is on life support. You think them wanting 200 billion in gold back in their hands is just a result of an management audit and nothing more?...
No it is not "well known" that the dollar is on life support. You may believe that but it is not "well known" amongst people who know these things.
Lets get our fact straight. It is only 52 billion dollars in gold they are taking from the US. They are also not taking it all and are doing it by 2020.
Most people here didn't even read the article. It isn't even a big deal.
Originally posted by hawkiye
reply to post by tide88
Lets get our fact straight. It is only 52 billion dollars in gold they are taking from the US. They are also not taking it all and are doing it by 2020.
Most people here didn't even read the article. It isn't even a big deal.
Yes shall we... The article states "200 billion" not 50. It's quoted in the OP. And if you don't think its a big deal then you are simply asleep...
edit on 16-1-2013 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Libertygal
Originally posted by votan
Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by HenryNorris
It's official!
We suck!
Obama has really changed things.
It wasn't just obama.. it has been him and every administratrion before that has been leading us down this path.. both republican and democrat... stop drinking the koolaide of the left right paradigm
Really? How many trillions in 4 years now? I think he is responsible for a goodly portion of out of control spending.
I am not left nor right. How about YOU quit parrotting tired, used up isms and come up with some original thought? Since we are now thinking it is ok to tell people what to do...
edit on 16-1-2013 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)edit on 16-1-2013 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)