posted on Jan, 16 2013 @ 02:26 AM
Just thought i would add my grain of salt to the current issue of Lance Armstrong finally admitting that he lied about his doping issues in the
interview with Oprah this week.
So… according to the Daily Beast :
Cyclist Lance Armstrong admitted to doping during an interview with Oprah Winfrey on Monday, the talk-show host said Tuesday. Winfrey said, “We were
mesmerized and riveted” by Armstrong’s answers. “He did not come clean in the manner I was expecting.” Armstrong reportedly plans to testify
against cycling officials who allegedly knew about his drug use. Armstrong also is believed to have issued a mea culpa to the staff of his charity,
Livestrong, and called members of the cycling community to apologize for allegedly lying and misleading them. Winfrey also announced the interview had
been spread over two nights, and will now air Thursday and Friday
My 3 questions are the following :
1. Do you think it is fair that the 7 Tours de France titles that he gained be attributed to the “real” winners (taking into account that they too
were also probably doped up to the eyeballs?)… but then again, maybe not! Although within professional cycling this phenomena is apparently quite a
2. Before the news comes out at the end of the week on Oprah’s show (she needs to score an audience as apparently her company is going badly)… How
do you think he doped himself up?
I have my own rough ideas in regards to his testicular cancer issue… *ahem ahem*, it is quite possible that false urine tests can be relayed to a
“false” pouch of clean urine in the empty testicular pouch of his scrotum.
3. Do you think that his team’s medical staff had more to do with this doping issue than Lance Armstrong himself?
Further doping info to help you make up your own mind
Just thinking out loudly and would appreciate feedback.