It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neoholographic
but I just can't see the logic in a womans right to choose.
Originally posted by Echo3Foxtrot
When a man doesn't want to take care of his child, he is a deadbeat dad.
When a woman doesn't want to take care of her child, it's okay because it's her choice.
Abortion is murder because people are self satisfying idiots who only think of themselves. Don't want to take care of a kid? Easy, don't have sex OR make sure you're not an idiot and take every precaution not to get pregnant because if you already have that mindset you don't deserve to have children.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by GradientWell
What? I don't even get an...I'm sorry?
A ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court today makes the argument that unborn children deserve legal protection under the law.
The state court issued a ruling saying the state’s chemical endangerment of a child law also includes protection for unborn children. Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange issued a statement calling the decision a victory. Strange said the court ruled that “the plain meaning of the word ‘child’ in the chemical endangerment statute includes unborn children.”
The plain meaning of the word "child" to include the unborn should be universal and not just applied to one statute. I think this is hypocritical to protect the child from chemical endangerment and nothing more.
Why is it a womans right to choose life or death for another human being?