Lol, I didn't realsie they hid things like that! SnF! Thank you.
The Microwave Conspiracy, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 15-1-2013 @ 10:06 AM by mrkeen
Hello everybody!
This time I would like to discuss the topic for which I could find no other name but the 'Microwave conspiracy'. Not so long ago we all used wired communications, just like Nature itself uses in living organisms: thousands and thousands of miles of wires inside each living being to connect various nervous centers to the respective body parts. Every organ however small receives its own wire, but why bother if wireless communication is so much better? Because obviously it is not. Wireless communication is reseved by Nature for some other purposes, like telepathy, empathy and other higher level social behavior. Low-level behavior is regulated by zillions of wires. It is robust, energy efficient and makes every part of your body work as intended. Imagine what would happen if your liver started receiving signals that were addressed to your stomach, and vice versa? I guess it would be a total confusion leading to the collapse of your body.
What do we have today instead? Everywhere there is high-frequency exposure, and it is increasing. More and more bands are introduced, and exposure in the established ranges becomes higher. Official point of view is that there are no known health effects of the so called 'low-level' microwave exposure (i.e. cellphones, cell masts, wi-fi routers, wireless baby monitors, DECT phones, wireless electricity meters are supposed to be 'healthy'). Basically it means that unless you put your head inside a microwave oven, you are perfectly safe. Authorities claim that there is 'not enough' evidence that there are significant health effects of microwave radiation. However, there is plenty of evidence. Here are just a few links to peer-reviewed medical publications that prove there are too many health effects associated with microwave exposure:
Single-strand DNA breaks
Fetal brain damage
Brain oxidation
Effects on immune system, stress response, blood-brain barrier, blood pressure, reproductive tract
Kidney diseases
Heart palpitations
Genotoxic effects
Degradation of plants
The question is why with all these effects there is a trend to suppress this scientifically proven data and sedate the public with the "no significant evidence" argument? There is enough evidence to at least suspend the extension of the existing networks and standards and recommend removal of wi-fi from schools, kindergartens, hospitals, etc. at the same time funding a more extensive independent research.
Also, some people claim they can feel high-frequency radiation and are affected by it. In some countries (like Sweden) these symptoms are taken into account while in other countries such people are ridiculed or even called crazy. I myself can feel certain electromagnetic fields. I used to have this capability long before the first cellular network was introduced. I can distinguish low frequency power lines from wireless transmitters. And 800MHz, 2.5GHz and higher waves seemingly give the most unpleasant feelings. Due to this discomfort (and not because of just reading some reports) I do not use Wi-Fi at home and I usually avoid restaurants which offer free wireless Internet. I don't even need to read the sign, I know from 20-30 m that there is a Wi-Fi router there. But now it is almost impossible to find a place without one.
And in conclusion, one more question: why would anybody want to hide microwave antennas by disguising them as trees and other natural landmarks?
More examples of cellphone tower disguises
This time I would like to discuss the topic for which I could find no other name but the 'Microwave conspiracy'. Not so long ago we all used wired communications, just like Nature itself uses in living organisms: thousands and thousands of miles of wires inside each living being to connect various nervous centers to the respective body parts. Every organ however small receives its own wire, but why bother if wireless communication is so much better? Because obviously it is not. Wireless communication is reseved by Nature for some other purposes, like telepathy, empathy and other higher level social behavior. Low-level behavior is regulated by zillions of wires. It is robust, energy efficient and makes every part of your body work as intended. Imagine what would happen if your liver started receiving signals that were addressed to your stomach, and vice versa? I guess it would be a total confusion leading to the collapse of your body.
What do we have today instead? Everywhere there is high-frequency exposure, and it is increasing. More and more bands are introduced, and exposure in the established ranges becomes higher. Official point of view is that there are no known health effects of the so called 'low-level' microwave exposure (i.e. cellphones, cell masts, wi-fi routers, wireless baby monitors, DECT phones, wireless electricity meters are supposed to be 'healthy'). Basically it means that unless you put your head inside a microwave oven, you are perfectly safe. Authorities claim that there is 'not enough' evidence that there are significant health effects of microwave radiation. However, there is plenty of evidence. Here are just a few links to peer-reviewed medical publications that prove there are too many health effects associated with microwave exposure:
Single-strand DNA breaks
Fetal brain damage
Brain oxidation
Effects on immune system, stress response, blood-brain barrier, blood pressure, reproductive tract
Kidney diseases
Heart palpitations
Genotoxic effects
Degradation of plants
The question is why with all these effects there is a trend to suppress this scientifically proven data and sedate the public with the "no significant evidence" argument? There is enough evidence to at least suspend the extension of the existing networks and standards and recommend removal of wi-fi from schools, kindergartens, hospitals, etc. at the same time funding a more extensive independent research.
Also, some people claim they can feel high-frequency radiation and are affected by it. In some countries (like Sweden) these symptoms are taken into account while in other countries such people are ridiculed or even called crazy. I myself can feel certain electromagnetic fields. I used to have this capability long before the first cellular network was introduced. I can distinguish low frequency power lines from wireless transmitters. And 800MHz, 2.5GHz and higher waves seemingly give the most unpleasant feelings. Due to this discomfort (and not because of just reading some reports) I do not use Wi-Fi at home and I usually avoid restaurants which offer free wireless Internet. I don't even need to read the sign, I know from 20-30 m that there is a Wi-Fi router there. But now it is almost impossible to find a place without one.
And in conclusion, one more question: why would anybody want to hide microwave antennas by disguising them as trees and other natural landmarks?
More examples of cellphone tower disguises
edit on
15-1-2013 by mrkeen because: minor edit
reply posted on 15-1-2013 @ 10:13 AM by gladtobehere
reply to post by mrkeen
A friend of mine wont eat and food cooked in a microwave.
They will tell you to never stand near a microwave when its in use. So its ok to radiate the food we're about to eat but we cant stand next to the device radiating the food?
A friend of mine wont eat and food cooked in a microwave.
They will tell you to never stand near a microwave when its in use. So its ok to radiate the food we're about to eat but we cant stand next to the device radiating the food?
reply posted on 15-1-2013 @ 10:47 AM by Sly1one
reply to post by mrkeen
You know I have ALWAYS wondered about this...simply because the microwave became a new household product around the same time people were drinking irradiated water as a "healthy" option...
When I was little I always asked my mom if it was safe to stand next to and she said yes but I STILL never did it...for some reason instinctively I didn't want to be next to the damn thing and to this day I walk away when something is cooking in it.
As far as what it does to your food I have questioned that as well but I still eat microwaved food because honestly...when you are hungry you don't make the most rational decisions...you just want to eat...a hungry stomach makes horrible decisions.
anyway I wouldn't be surprised if it was "unhealthy" pretty much everything that was invented for convenience has turned out to be a bad idea with consequences were just NOW beginning to see/understand...assuming we are willing to acknowledge them at all (hello ignorance).
I remember reading somewhere about a simple test anyone can do to see how unhealthy microwaves are. Simply get 2 plants both equally healthy and water one with regular water and the other with water you microwave. Let the water you microwave cool to room temp before watering plant.
Anyway the microwaved water apparently stunts the growth and health of the plant.
Wish I could find the source for the above...
You know I have ALWAYS wondered about this...simply because the microwave became a new household product around the same time people were drinking irradiated water as a "healthy" option...
When I was little I always asked my mom if it was safe to stand next to and she said yes but I STILL never did it...for some reason instinctively I didn't want to be next to the damn thing and to this day I walk away when something is cooking in it.
As far as what it does to your food I have questioned that as well but I still eat microwaved food because honestly...when you are hungry you don't make the most rational decisions...you just want to eat...a hungry stomach makes horrible decisions.
anyway I wouldn't be surprised if it was "unhealthy" pretty much everything that was invented for convenience has turned out to be a bad idea with consequences were just NOW beginning to see/understand...assuming we are willing to acknowledge them at all (hello ignorance).
I remember reading somewhere about a simple test anyone can do to see how unhealthy microwaves are. Simply get 2 plants both equally healthy and water one with regular water and the other with water you microwave. Let the water you microwave cool to room temp before watering plant.
Anyway the microwaved water apparently stunts the growth and health of the plant.
Wish I could find the source for the above...
reply posted on 15-1-2013 @ 11:28 AM by mrkeen
reply to post by Sly1one
Thank you for your post, but this thread it is not about microwave ovens in the first place. It is about the microwave frequencies in cellphones, wireless routers, etc., especially regarding non-thermal effects, which are more sophisticated than the effects you mentioned. You can turn off or throw your microwave oven out of the window, but you can't just 'turn off' a cellphone mast that is seen from your window or your neighbor's wi-fi router. And these devices produce microwave exposure which is harmful in more than one way (see my first post for the links). I apologize if the thread name is misleading, but technically speaking 'microwave' means a lot more than just kitchen gadgets. It's at the core of today's communication technology.
Thank you for your post, but this thread it is not about microwave ovens in the first place. It is about the microwave frequencies in cellphones, wireless routers, etc., especially regarding non-thermal effects, which are more sophisticated than the effects you mentioned. You can turn off or throw your microwave oven out of the window, but you can't just 'turn off' a cellphone mast that is seen from your window or your neighbor's wi-fi router. And these devices produce microwave exposure which is harmful in more than one way (see my first post for the links). I apologize if the thread name is misleading, but technically speaking 'microwave' means a lot more than just kitchen gadgets. It's at the core of today's communication technology.
reply posted on 15-1-2013 @ 11:48 AM by mrkeen
reply to post by Jykan
I used the sci-fi analogy as a mere illustration. If you prefer a more realistic example, the recent spill in the Gulf of Mexico triggered numerous mutations in the creatures living there. These mutations are harmful and the creatures are crippled. Science is yet to prove that mutations can lead to improvements in living organisms. We should be aware about the effects of today's technology on the environment. And if oil spills are far away and are just occasional disasters, the wireless tech is in our homes and on the streets, it's too widespread to ignore and perhaps the most simple area to deal with. Just turn off your wi-fi router and suggest your neighbor to do the same. Buy an electrosmog meter (there are some cheap models starting from $150 or so), and check your home and your workplace, and if it shows too much exposure (e.g. more than 8 uW/c2), taken some measures to reduce exposure. You will probably like the way you feel without too much wireless signals running through you body. You can then find places without exposure, where you can relax and meditate and take your kids to play there. And so on. These are simple first steps toward the acknowledgement of actual health risks associated with wireless technology. People need to be educated and prepared and not bury their heads in the sand believing that this tech is safe just because the scientists are too busy or unprepared to popularize their findings (except for some prominent volunteers).
I used the sci-fi analogy as a mere illustration. If you prefer a more realistic example, the recent spill in the Gulf of Mexico triggered numerous mutations in the creatures living there. These mutations are harmful and the creatures are crippled. Science is yet to prove that mutations can lead to improvements in living organisms. We should be aware about the effects of today's technology on the environment. And if oil spills are far away and are just occasional disasters, the wireless tech is in our homes and on the streets, it's too widespread to ignore and perhaps the most simple area to deal with. Just turn off your wi-fi router and suggest your neighbor to do the same. Buy an electrosmog meter (there are some cheap models starting from $150 or so), and check your home and your workplace, and if it shows too much exposure (e.g. more than 8 uW/c2), taken some measures to reduce exposure. You will probably like the way you feel without too much wireless signals running through you body. You can then find places without exposure, where you can relax and meditate and take your kids to play there. And so on. These are simple first steps toward the acknowledgement of actual health risks associated with wireless technology. People need to be educated and prepared and not bury their heads in the sand believing that this tech is safe just because the scientists are too busy or unprepared to popularize their findings (except for some prominent volunteers).
edit on 15-1-2013 by mrkeen because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 15-1-2013 @ 11:57 AM by mrkeen
reply to post by abeverage
You made a good point. But the main premise of this 'conspiracy' is not about not being affected, but about hiding the scientific findings about the harmful effects. People who possess big money can be very greedy to the point of ignoring any health risks that this wireless expansion brings about in favor of high profits. And also if you have a lot of money, you can live wherever you want, especially far away from the places where most cellphone towers and other transmitters are located. But if you are an ordinary citizen you can't move around that easily. Also in some countries you can't even buy an electrosmog meter to check your environment, and healthcare specialists refuse to acknowledge symptoms associated with microwave/cellphone exposure. So this is not necessarily a conspiracy to make people mutants, but a conspiracy to conceal important information which prevents people from making a conscious decision and protecting themselves from excessive exposure, e.g. when they live too close to a cellphone tower.
You made a good point. But the main premise of this 'conspiracy' is not about not being affected, but about hiding the scientific findings about the harmful effects. People who possess big money can be very greedy to the point of ignoring any health risks that this wireless expansion brings about in favor of high profits. And also if you have a lot of money, you can live wherever you want, especially far away from the places where most cellphone towers and other transmitters are located. But if you are an ordinary citizen you can't move around that easily. Also in some countries you can't even buy an electrosmog meter to check your environment, and healthcare specialists refuse to acknowledge symptoms associated with microwave/cellphone exposure. So this is not necessarily a conspiracy to make people mutants, but a conspiracy to conceal important information which prevents people from making a conscious decision and protecting themselves from excessive exposure, e.g. when they live too close to a cellphone tower.
edit on 15-1-2013 by mrkeen because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 15-1-2013 @ 12:04 PM by abeverage
Originally posted by mrkeen
reply to post by abeverage
You made a good point. But the main premise of this 'conspiracy' is not about not being affected, but about hiding the scientific findings about the harmful effects. People who possess big money can be very greedy to the point of ignoring any health risks that this wireless expansion brings about in favor of high profits. And also if you have a lot of money, you can live wherever you want, especially far away from the places where most cellphone towers and other sources are located. But if you are an ordinary citizen you can't move around that easily. Also in some countries you can't even buy an electrosmog meter to check your environment, and healthcare specialists refuse to acknowledge symptoms associated with microwave/cellphone exposure. So this is not necessarily a conspiracy to make people mutants, but a conspiracy to conceal important information which prevents people from making a conscious decision and protecting themselves from excessive exposure, e.g. when they live too close to a cellphone tower.edit on 15-1-2013 by mrkeen because: minor edit
Ok sure you might be limiting your exposure but the rich still have to work and many do in cities. I will concede that there is no way I would live under one, but within a hundred yard why not? Frequency is not direct so unless I am holding it to my head often I see no harm...
reply posted on 15-1-2013 @ 11:57 PM by Dispo
reply to post by gladtobehere
Your food is exposed to ionising beta or gamma radiation before it even gets delivered to the supermarket, to kill any pathogens present.
Irradiating food does not make it radioactive.
Analogy:
You cook your food using a fire, but you wouldn't want to put your hand in the fire would you?
Your food is exposed to ionising beta or gamma radiation before it even gets delivered to the supermarket, to kill any pathogens present.
Irradiating food does not make it radioactive.
Analogy:
You cook your food using a fire, but you wouldn't want to put your hand in the fire would you?
Pages: ^^TOP^^
Hallucinations of spiders when you\'re woken up suddenly? anyone experience this?
Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Archaeologists uncover nearly 5,000 ancient cave paintings in Burgos, Mexico
Ancient & Lost Civilizations: 14 minutes ago
Ancient & Lost Civilizations: 14 minutes ago
Newly Compiled Lists of Observed Satellite Reentries -- many involved in UFO reports
Aliens and UFOs: 17 minutes ago
Aliens and UFOs: 17 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
*Urgent* - 'Mysterious Respiratory illness' in the United States
Diseases and Pandemics: 17 hours ago, 83 flags
Diseases and Pandemics: 17 hours ago, 83 flags
2 FBI Agents Involved in Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's Arrest "FALL" Out of Helicopter and Die
Breaking Alternative News: 10 hours ago, 38 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 10 hours ago, 38 flags
I was moved by an instance of masonic charity and wanted to share it
Secret Societies: 16 hours ago, 14 flags
Secret Societies: 16 hours ago, 14 flags
"America is the greatest country in the world!!!". Not exactly.
US Political Madness: 17 hours ago, 10 flags
US Political Madness: 17 hours ago, 10 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Was Jesus Christ just a man??? Aetheists VS Christians, BATTLE ROYALE
Conspiracies in Religions: 17 hours ago, 140 replies
Conspiracies in Religions: 17 hours ago, 140 replies
Ask a spiritual question and I will contrive to bring you the answer
Philosophy and Metaphysics: 15 hours ago, 85 replies
Philosophy and Metaphysics: 15 hours ago, 85 replies
2 FBI Agents Involved in Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's Arrest "FALL" Out of Helicopter and Die
Breaking Alternative News: 10 hours ago, 80 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 10 hours ago, 80 replies
*Urgent* - 'Mysterious Respiratory illness' in the United States
Diseases and Pandemics: 17 hours ago, 76 replies
Diseases and Pandemics: 17 hours ago, 76 replies
Video of Woolrich Attacker... Having a Conversation Literally Red Handed?
Other Current Events: 7 hours ago, 56 replies
Other Current Events: 7 hours ago, 56 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.266 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.266 seconds
