posted on Jan, 15 2013 @ 02:36 PM
Originally posted by MrConspiracy
reply to post by Spiro
I am not rejecting claims without reason. I'm rejecting them when they are trying to tell me that what i saw was just the sun itself.
However, you must understand that what you say and what you provide as evidence is what members are taking into account. You say you didn't see the
Sun but yet show pictures of the sun. See what I'm saying here? In your images, it is clearly the Sun even if you say it was not what you seen with
your eyes. Probably best to remove the pictures and just tell the story. But then, you will be asked for " pictures or it didn't happen " which brings
us back to this evidence you provided, which looks very like the Sun!
What i saw was NOT the physical sun.
We can only take your word for it. The pictures say it was the Sun.
More than likely a reflection of the sun.
A reflection of the Sun? How? What do you mean?
If you're trying to make out i think it's some sort of planet or some other crazy theory, please stop. I never suggested that.
No, not at all. I know you never suggested that
I know what i saw. I know that i saw where the sun was. And i know the other "thing" was not the sun itself but more than likely as i've said
TIME AND TIME again, a reflection or illusion of sorts.
What do you mean a reflection? I don't understand how the Sun can reflect itself off off it's self?
You're taking the pictures for the complete story and i'm sorry but where is that going to get you?
Of course I am because that is what I am seeing. It's going to " get me " the answer to what you saw. I cant just take your word for it because you
supplied pictures as evidence.
The pictures do look like the sun, i know. But that's because i didn't have a good camera with me.
Of course they do, because it IS the SUN. It's nothing to do with a good camera. I have taken pictures over the years with a £5000 camera and have
similar, if not identical results.
Would you please stop trying to make me out like i have no common sense.
The don't provide Sun pictures as evidence
I clearly stated what i thought it could be in the original post. But i will not let you tell me it was the physical sun itself when i KNOW it
Be safe be well
edit on 15-1-2013 by Spiro because: (no reason given)