It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
so not just a list of gun owners and permit holders but they want to keep electronic records of all purchases of ammunition too and it seems they are also not grandfathering in magazines as well? only part of this that makes sense to me is the "webster provision"
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - Provisions in a sweeping gun control bill before the New York Legislature: -Further restrict assault weapons to define them by a single feature, such as a pistol grip. Current law requires two features. -Make the unsafe storage of assault weapons a misdemeanor. -Mandate a police registry of assault weapons. -Establish a state registry for all private sales, with a background check done through a licensed dealer for a fee, excluding sales to immediate relatives. -Require a therapist who believes a mental health patient made a credible threat to use a gun illegally to report the threat to a mental health director who would then have to report serious threats to the state Department of Criminal Justice Services. A patient's gun could be taken from him or her. -Ban the Internet sale of assault weapons. -Require stores that sell ammunition to register with the state, run background checks on buyers of bullets and keep an electronic database of bullet sales. -Restrict ammunition magazines to seven bullets, from the current national standard of 10. Current owners of higher-capacity magazines would have a year to sell them out of state. Someone caught with eight or more bullets in a magazine could face a misdemeanor charge. -Require that stolen guns be reported within 24 hours. Otherwise, the owner would face a possible misdemeanor. -Increase sentences for gun crimes including for taking a gun on school property. -Increase penalties for shooting first responders, called the "Webster provision." Two firefighters were killed when shot by a person who set a fire in the western New York town of Webster last month. The crime would be punishable by life in prison without parole. -Limit the state records law to protect handgun owners from being identified publicly. The provision would allow a handgun permit holder a means to maintain privacy under the Freedom of Information law. -Require pistol permit holders or those who will be registered as owners of assault rifles to be re certified at least every five years to make sure they are still legally able to own the guns.
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
Hey! Mental and Crazy People! If you like your guns, DO NOT seek professional help for your condition, and then you can get around the new law and KEEP your guns!!!
Great Job! New York! Now, all of the psychos, and paranoid delusionals who might own guns, WON'T get any help!!!
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
Hey! Mental and Crazy People! If you like your guns, DO NOT seek professional help for your condition, and then you can get around the new law and KEEP your guns!!!
Great Job! New York! Now, all of the psychos, and paranoid delusionals who might own guns, WON'T get any help!!!
that seems to be the just of it but hopefully some one far more crafty then i can clarify if it applies to this new law or not
The next section of Article One provided limits on Congress's powers: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person. The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.[61] No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State. No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another. No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time. No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
can any one clarify what it means by does not apply to civil matters>?
A bill of attainder is a law by which a person is immediately convicted without trial. An ex post facto law is a law which applies retroactively, punishing someone for an act that was only made criminal after it was done. The ex post facto clause does not apply to civil matters.[62]
found this that seems to further clarify the matter and it seems this kind of law is the exact thing the founding fathers did not want to have happen in the usa so im hoping the supreme court strikes this down like it did the dc hand gun ban and other unconstitutional gun laws that Illinois tried to pass
Clause 3. No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. A bill of attainder is a law that simply declares, by legislative fiat, that certain people are guilty of a crime and then imposes some kind of punishment upon them. In other words, it's a way for a legislature to act like judge and jury, convicting and punishing people without benefit of trial. Bills of attainder used to be used occasionally by the British Parliament; the American Founding Fathers viewed them as terrible violations of liberty and banned them from the United States. An ex post facto law is a law that retroactively criminalizes a certain act after it has already been committed. In other words, it would allow a person to be prosecuted for doing something that wasn't actually illegal yet at the time they did it. The framers of the Constitution viewed ex post facto laws, like bills of attainder, as blatant abuses of power and banned them.