It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by k1k1to
reply to post by iSHRED
there is no such thing as an "oath"
its what you believe in deep down, you create your own oath...
so what are you telling me..that before you "swore" you wouldn't have upheld and defended the constitution?..
many so called "oath" holders have violated the very thing they swore to protect.
so just because i never swore on anything does that mean im not willing to do the same thing you swore to do?
give me a break and cut it out with this whole oath crap..just do whats right and what you know to be right deep down, technically you swore that oath to the corrupt us government and all it represents...
i say we create the PATRIOT OATH and swear to that
reply to post by pheonix358
The idea of "I was just following orders" was nullified at the Nuremberg Trials. This was largely done by the US.
Originally posted by SeenAlot
Uniform Code of MilitaryJustice
But let's say you, Joe Dogface wants to bring charges against the president. First off, I see no precedent or by-law for that. It would be unique. Tho, in reading the above article and this one by Wiki it's not impossible. But would create a power play for the presidency pro-tem. I also would have to say could be held in a public court.
When I say "public court", the way I read this, is that as a GI you can bring about charges of a court marshal against those both above you and below you in rank. The court itself is supposed to be held in front of five, three or in the most extreme situations seen by a single judge of higher authority than the accused. According to these two links, there is no higher authority that the PUSA.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
reply to post by pheonix358
The idea of "I was just following orders" was nullified at the Nuremberg Trials. This was largely done by the US.
Our soldiers were also just following orders when the Bush administration declared war on Iraq under false pretenses. So in actuality, there should have been war crimes lodged against Bush and his cronies. What's even worse, they changed the mission when the facts became known that Powell's evidence was all just smoke and mirrors.
If we were not a super power, government officials in the U.S. would have been held accountable. So it's true, that people in power are under a different set of laws than the rest of us.
Originally posted by ADVISOR
reply to post by pheonix358
What link is that, none of my links are broke....
I just checked them like three times, and I am confused as tot he link you mean.