I got punched in the face for asking for my receipt; literally.

reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep


I don't think you realize that somebody has conveyed their lunatic personality
in our society. And it certainly isn't the dependent variable.

reply to post by Dispo


Aggravating to who though? Is it aggravating to ask for a bank statement if
your bank doesn't send you one? Should the bank
come to your house and push you around?

Originally posted by streetfightingman
reply to post by Dispo

 

Aggravating to who though? Is it aggravating to ask for a bank statement if
your bank doesn't send you one? Should the bank
come to your house and push you around?

That's grasping at an invisible straw....

Des

reply to post by streetfightingman


people can see through it so i have no need to respond further i have made many points that show you are a lying and anyone reading the thread can see you keep making things up in this and other threads to get a reaction. for me it's over . I'm not playing your game i dont believe a single word you say. not one. your constant changing has proved you are not trustworthy. yes i do get anxious in some situations but i am obsessively polite to people not rude or demanding and i am only ever violent when defending myself. strange that someone allegedly with autism doesn't understand the basic fact that we are all different and generalizations don't work yet throughout the thread you have made generalizations.... like any aspie would ... being the first followed by loads about what autistic behaviour is . enjoy your game but im not playing anymore it got boring

Originally posted by streetfightingman
And it certainly isn't the dependent variable.

Objection: opinion not based on rational perception, witness not impartial.

reply to post by Destinyone


How so? Can you provide specific examples as to how that's over-extending any term
or definition of the circumstance and it's results?

Originally posted by streetfightingman
reply to post by glassspider

 

I know for a fact that all autistic people aren't offensive. And it's sad that
any accusations at all are made against us.

However, of course, being autistic yourself you can understand
how at one point or sometimes your actions or your rhetoric might
be conveyed as arrogant, plain, blatant, or anxious.

I am most certainly not a person who enjoys starting confrontation.

Yes, I wanted a Sunny D, Granola Bars, and Fight Club the Real Deal.
Seriously?

You are using Aspergers as a crutch for your behavior ( i know you didn't come right out and say it but I gathered from the post and your recent conspiracy theory on eugenics with the report from Here) and yet you don't want to improve yourself? You cannot admit that perhaps that you were in the wrong and that your actions are going to be perceived as harassing and instigating?
If you learned or read anything about that condition you would realize that people can learn how to cope with those situations and learn to avoid problems ahead of time and that they do indeed lead productive social lives, within their coping mechanisms. I think what you need to do OP is reevaluate yourself and find a support group that can give you some advice on how to be a bit more social and how to cope with the behaviors associated with Aspergers.

reply to post by glassspider


I really can't wrap my head around this whole "game" theory you think
I have going on

reply to post by streetfightingman


Aggravating to the IV. Research subject not banks - please employ academic rigour and refrain from topic meandering.

DV actions aggravated IV - evidence: IV has multiple successful interaction with extra-experimental EVs on daily basis - evidence: IV still has job, if previous evidence false, this statement false.

reply to post by topherman420


Of course I added that in. It's an Aside. I know you really, really, really want to debunk me.

But it can't happen. Because I'm not using any crutches. I'm saying I'm Autistic
and it's important because my rhetoric might have been parlayed as rude
and that would have been the extransory variable that is not considered

Originally posted by streetfightingman
I'm saying I'm Autistic
and it's important because my rhetoric might have been parlayed as rude
and that would have been the extransory variable that is not considered

Methodology flawed - DV retains full faculty control at all times, autism influences thoughts and perceptions, not actions directly.

Suggest DV uses CBT or similar to remove influence of abnormal thought processes from behaviour if this trait undesirable.

reply to post by Dispo


The fact that I might have been parlayed as rude is enough magnetism
for the reactant to be activated.

What atomic weight inside that variable is unknown
unless an analytical evaluation was conducted

reply to post by streetfightingman


True, but do you accept that a counterweight on the DV could have avoided the reaction altogether?

Originally posted by streetfightingman
reply to post by topherman420

 

Of course I added that in. It's an Aside. I know you really, really, really want to debunk me.

But it can't happen. Because I'm not using any crutches. I'm saying I'm Autistic
and it's important because my rhetoric might have been parlayed as rude
and that would have been the extransory variable that is not considered

Im actually kind of giving you the benefit of the doubt in a way. You mentioned how the owner hates the disabled, you mentioned how you might come off as rude when you don't mean to, yet you do absolutely nothing on your behalf to help yourself. You expect everyone to tip toe around you is that it? You can't really come off as a saint now, that boat has long ago sailed. But you could at least admit that your condition is the reason why you cannot interact like the majority of others in a social situation and maybe take some steps to help yourself to avoid more of this in the future.

reply to post by Dispo


No cognitive behavior was displayed until a reactant was activated
after the fact that a neutral acidic reaction
was expected to occur as opposed to any negative
reaction or fission thereof any variables

reply to post by Dispo


Of course. However, then I would have not had my food. I came for my food,
so the extransory variable of the dependant variable was
inhibited because the independent variable was volatile
to any fission reactions that were caused due to any
unexpected EMP waves

reply to post by streetfightingman


I give up. You are literally (get it?) throwing age 16-18 chemistry words together and trying to make it look like you're not trolling.

reply to post by streetfightingman


Flawed methodology. DV provided activation energy for reaction to occur with "rude" contact.

reply to post by streetfightingman


Mate the way you ranted, and acted was obnoxious, not worth a punch, but still obnoxious. Try mellowing out and simply asking for a receipt. Is that so out there??

reply to post by Dispo


How are these grade 10 science terms? These are terms that exist in today's
world.

I am describing the reaction exactly how it occurred. Seeing as how we are all
carbon copies. We are all chemical beings.

Of course I could have walked away without my receipt, or my guarantee, or my food.

But then I wouldn't have accomplished my goal. I wanted to accomplish my goal. And I wanted
to rationalize with the person who didn't like my advocacy.