It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
reply to post by SpaDe_
Mate, mine already does and has.
But then again I don't live in a gun dependant country.
This is not a thread to have a petty argument with me please, this is my view and I'm entitled to it.
Or are you trying to control what I do and say.......How ironic?
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
reply to post by Rineocerous
That's a completely pathetic reply also.
You want me to be apathetic to someone who owns guns? You want me to feel sorry that he has to comply with new laws? By owning dealy weapons, you want me to somehow think that he has it hard because the government want to clamp down on masses of deadly weapons amongst your communities?
Give me a break.
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Good to see this, About time.
and
for a tougher assault weapons ban and restrictions on ammunition and the sale of guns, as well as a mandatory police registry of assault weapons, grandfathering in assault weapons already in private hands.
as well as
assault weapons are defined by having two "military rifle" features spelled out in the law. The proposal would reduce that to one feature and include the popular pistol grip.
now if that is not a gun grab then what is???
Private sales of assault weapons to someone other than an immediate family would be subject to a background check through a dealer. Also Internet sales of assault weapons would be banned, and failing to safely store a weapon could be subject to a misdemeanor charge.
Ammunition magazines would be restricted to seven bullets, from the current 10, and current owners of higher-capacity magazines would have a year to sell them out of state. An owner caught at home with eight or more bullets in a magazine could face a misdemeanor charge.
Why do these peoples lives revolve around guns so bloody much?