It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theghoster
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by theghoster Don't you give a damn whether your friends or partner or whatever you have (if anyone) gets killed or hurt or maimed?
No, why would i when what i propose is for the greater good......we are here but for the blink of an eye as we have been here but for the blink of an eye and in that blink we have basically destroyed a whole Planet with our greed....
we must be stopped for the sake of our species....we are corrupt, we are sick and we need healing..
I look around me and i see Consumers with no conscious thoughts of their own, they are just like locusts devouring all before them....we must be stopped or at the very least slowed down to a level that we can sustain.
Fine, then implement a one-child policy, or raise taxes on people have children, or make having kids more expensive and costly. At least try a peaceful route than the one you are advocating.
Hell, even without the empathy argument ( which clearly you have not interest in hearing) how would starting WW3 which would no doubt include nuclear weapons help man survive into the future. You would literally destroy the biosphere for centuries to come. I don't care how many underground bunkers you build...there would be nothing waiting for the survivors of this war at the sol called "End Game". There will literally be no more game to play. Your plan is not only lacks empathy it doesn't even make practical or logistical sense.
Guess what? Your not some grand chess master who coolly and intelligently thinks about the "Big Picture" for mankind, while the rest of us are just foolish beasts. Your just a short-sighted psycho
-TheGhosteredit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by theghoster
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by theghoster Don't you give a damn whether your friends or partner or whatever you have (if anyone) gets killed or hurt or maimed?
No, why would i when what i propose is for the greater good......we are here but for the blink of an eye as we have been here but for the blink of an eye and in that blink we have basically destroyed a whole Planet with our greed....
we must be stopped for the sake of our species....we are corrupt, we are sick and we need healing..
I look around me and i see Consumers with no conscious thoughts of their own, they are just like locusts devouring all before them....we must be stopped or at the very least slowed down to a level that we can sustain.
Fine, then implement a one-child policy, or raise taxes on people have children, or make having kids more expensive and costly. At least try a peaceful route than the one you are advocating.
Hell, even without the empathy argument ( which clearly you have not interest in hearing) how would starting WW3 which would no doubt include nuclear weapons help man survive into the future. You would literally destroy the biosphere for centuries to come. I don't care how many underground bunkers you build...there would be nothing waiting for the survivors of this war at the sol called "End Game". There will literally be no more game to play. Your plan is not only lacks empathy it doesn't even make practical or logistical sense.
Guess what? Your not some grand chess master who coolly and intelligently thinks about the "Big Picture" for mankind, while the rest of us are just foolish beasts. Your just a short-sighted psycho
-TheGhosteredit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)
Life will always find a way...with us or without us this planet needs to go on....so what if it takes a thousand years to recover.....maybe a new species will have more respect for the only life giving planet that we know about within a million of light years from here.....our time is near....we have exhausted this planet in such a short space of time....it's time to move on and let another species take over...if Certain individual survive then so be it.....The Greater good with 0 compassion.
Originally posted by Krono
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by theghoster
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by theghoster Don't you give a damn whether your friends or partner or whatever you have (if anyone) gets killed or hurt or maimed?
No, why would i when what i propose is for the greater good......we are here but for the blink of an eye as we have been here but for the blink of an eye and in that blink we have basically destroyed a whole Planet with our greed....
we must be stopped for the sake of our species....we are corrupt, we are sick and we need healing..
I look around me and i see Consumers with no conscious thoughts of their own, they are just like locusts devouring all before them....we must be stopped or at the very least slowed down to a level that we can sustain.
Fine, then implement a one-child policy, or raise taxes on people have children, or make having kids more expensive and costly. At least try a peaceful route than the one you are advocating.
Hell, even without the empathy argument ( which clearly you have not interest in hearing) how would starting WW3 which would no doubt include nuclear weapons help man survive into the future. You would literally destroy the biosphere for centuries to come. I don't care how many underground bunkers you build...there would be nothing waiting for the survivors of this war at the sol called "End Game". There will literally be no more game to play. Your plan is not only lacks empathy it doesn't even make practical or logistical sense.
Guess what? Your not some grand chess master who coolly and intelligently thinks about the "Big Picture" for mankind, while the rest of us are just foolish beasts. Your just a short-sighted psycho
-TheGhosteredit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)
Life will always find a way...with us or without us this planet needs to go on....so what if it takes a thousand years to recover.....maybe a new species will have more respect for the only life giving planet that we know about within a million of light years from here.....our time is near....we have exhausted this planet in such a short space of time....it's time to move on and let another species take over...if Certain individual survive then so be it.....The Greater good with 0 compassion.
We could always recycle all the crap we wasted and colonise the solar system, which ofcourse will take a very long time.
Originally posted by theghoster
reply to post by Soloprotocol
Ok, now I get you. You don't WW3 so we can advance the human species. You want WW3 to eradicate the human species. Trust me my man, we won't need WW3 for that. We will do it on our own, with or without a war. Whether man should be eradicated at all is basically a subjective viewpoint, so I guess that question is up to the individual.
-TheGhosteredit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SaltireWarrior
You want a nuclear holocaust?
Look at pictures of Hiroshima. Look at how disfigured and deformed survivors are. Imagine all the innocent children dead.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by SaltireWarrior
You want a nuclear holocaust?
Look at pictures of Hiroshima. Look at how disfigured and deformed survivors are. Imagine all the innocent children dead.
Boo Hoo.....All for the greater Good...
Think of all the beautiful children/new life that will be, unfortunate for us in the here and now...just the times we live in......we fix the problem or we kill the planet.....
Originally posted by Krono
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by SaltireWarrior
You want a nuclear holocaust?
Look at pictures of Hiroshima. Look at how disfigured and deformed survivors are. Imagine all the innocent children dead.
Boo Hoo.....All for the greater Good...
Think of all the beautiful children/new life that will be, unfortunate for us in the here and now...just the times we live in......we fix the problem or we kill the planet.....
You're either extremely stupid, pig ignorant or a troll.
I'm going for all three.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by Krono
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by SaltireWarrior
You want a nuclear holocaust?
Look at pictures of Hiroshima. Look at how disfigured and deformed survivors are. Imagine all the innocent children dead.
Boo Hoo.....All for the greater Good...
Think of all the beautiful children/new life that will be, unfortunate for us in the here and now...just the times we live in......we fix the problem or we kill the planet.....
You're either extremely stupid, pig ignorant or a troll.
I'm going for all three.
Troll????....sooooo school child patter.....i would rather be all three as blind.....
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Is it time we Started WW3.
The Way is see it, This Planet is waaay over populated and the resources are running out, Fast. we will be extinct before we will ever get to the stage of planetary exploration if we keep going the way we are going.
So is it the right time to start preparing for the inevitable....
I say we dig in. We build underground bunkers that can house a few thousand people in each bunker.
self sustainable for a decade or more and go for a full blown nuclear holocaust....Small scale wars would never be enough to get the population down to a manageable level, so we prepare now, we start to think more about the future of the Human race and this rock we live on and where we are going and where we will be in a million years.
Sorry for the doom and gloom, but i really believe we have to have a serious look at our main problems...ie...over population and consumption of resources....
sacrifices have to be made.......are you prepared to make them...???
Originally posted by Krono
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by Krono
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Originally posted by SaltireWarrior
You want a nuclear holocaust?
Look at pictures of Hiroshima. Look at how disfigured and deformed survivors are. Imagine all the innocent children dead.
Boo Hoo.....All for the greater Good...
Think of all the beautiful children/new life that will be, unfortunate for us in the here and now...just the times we live in......we fix the problem or we kill the planet.....
You're either extremely stupid, pig ignorant or a troll.
I'm going for all three.
Troll????....sooooo school child patter.....i would rather be all three as blind.....
Well, you surely can't be serious about the opening post....surely.
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
We need a fix...and quick.....suggestion on a postcard please....Love, Peace, acid and Harmony will not do.
Originally posted by theghoster
reply to post by Krono
Don't bother Krono. This man doesn't know what he is advocating. Just look at the short history of his posts in his own threads. First he talks about (1) solving the resource/population problem created by man by starting WW3 to cleanse the planet. When that argument started getting scrutinized he argued that maybe only a (2) few humans should survive to keep the human race going in the long run. When that argument conflicted with his WW3 argument he (3) shifted the goal post to just eradicating humanity completely to make way for new life. A man with no real substance or argument. Just empty mindless rhetoric. This thread was over before it started.
-TheGhosteredit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by theghoster
reply to post by Krono
Don't bother Krono. This man doesn't know what he is advocating. Just look at the short history of his posts in his own threads. First he talks about (1) solving the resource/population problem created by man by starting WW3 to cleanse the planet. When that argument started getting scrutinized he argued that maybe only a (2) few humans should survive to keep the human race going in the long run. When that argument conflicted with his WW3 argument he (3) shifted the goal post to just eradicating humanity completely to make way for new life. A man with no real substance or argument. Just empty mindless rhetoric. This thread was over before it started.
-TheGhosteredit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)edit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Is it time we Started WW3.
Originally posted by theghoster
My plan is that we attempt to (1) keep civilization stable (that means, fewer Wars, silly bear) long enough to find a technological innovations capable enough to allow humanity to continue living as long as it can without destroying the rest of the planet and the rest of life. (2) Failing that, we should simply just try to survive as long and as peaceful as we can without causing irreversible damage to the planet.
Now, why is this better than starting WW3? Perhaps, because WW3 will likely end in nuclear strikes, which is more likely to totally destroy the planet's biosphere than our consumption habits.
As for finding solutions. You need to stop trying to find solutions and just let things be as they are. Life comes and goes.Besides, I'm sure planet Earth isn't the only rock in this Universe with life. You think by trying to end things, here and now, you have forethought, but that isn't forethought. That is just being controlling. Let it go man, time and life will march on with or without the hand of War. Let it go and let live (or not live). The Big Picture, remember?
-The Ghosteredit on 14-1-2013 by theghoster because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Soloprotocol
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
I'm not saying my family or i would survive this apocalypse or in any way we would be more deserving than others....not that i would want them to anyway....it would be hell on earth......all i'm saying is if a major catastrophe is what it takes for this world to survive for another billion years then so be it.....we/us/humans are just custodians of this planet, and we are really bad at the job in hand. something has to give.