Can anyone explain what these objects in SOHO are? Are they close to SOL? or Lense?

As some know I am 1 who finds a deep interest in the Star SOL and its activities, In recent days 1 has noticed on SOHO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) various anomalies that DO seem to be interacting with the surface of SOL (atleast on the videos below it seems this way. In the past many members on ATS have presented various threads related to possible celestial activity on SOL. And in the video and images below you can see something that seems to be doing something . So 1 felt it was a good idea to bring this to ATS for better evaluations, for these dont seem to be regular lens artifacts-debris on lens or even things close to the lens these seem closre to SOL. With that I will leave the floor for others to share what they may be seeing if anything related to what I have posted. Enjoy.

in video below you can see the movements and exposure perhaps 1 is discussing..

Go to site below and enter above data and then chose video viewing option instead of list or images. unless someone can link the actual video for me,,


sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...
use -
EIT 284 date: 2013-01-01 to 2013-01-14 if link does not work sorry..









EIT 195 date: 2013-01-01 to 2013-01-14 if link is not working











Also there is a Comet/Asteriod something seen in Lasco C3 2013/01/04 right before 542 frame, anyone know its name..


And to conclude from 2013-1-1 to 2013-1-7 is this an artifact sitting there in the lower left corner of Lasco C2 (not moving much)?


Thank you all for your time spent here. And if anyone can clarify why it seems some of these artifacts within the images seem to be interacting closert to SOL surface and not lens? I say this due to the exposure around these unknowns with SOL plasma...

LOVE LIGHT ETERNIA
NAMASTE*******

theyre going to say it is just artifacts of the image rendering process.

Agreed with the above. The comet one has been pulled, there probably photoshopping it as we speak

Originally posted by 0mage
theyre going to say it is just artifacts of the image rendering process.

but how they seem close to surface?

Originally posted by TheDoctor46
Agreed with the above. The comet one has been pulled, there probably photoshopping it as we speak

I may have linked them wrong but if you pick the dates 2013-01-01 to 2013-01-14 you can see the comet in Lasco. Thank you both for taking a look.

reply to post by Ophiuchus 13



This is the screen you will have to enter data date to see unknown comet and sitting artifact? in Lasco c2/c3. Excuse the issues but can any name the comet/asteroid? Thanks in advance

Update comet/asteroid still there in C3 Lasco. But is has NONAME?

is this a no answer answer Interesting if someone can name the asteroid/comet and or explain why these objects seem near SOL surface for 1 it will be appreciated. I will check back later..

NAMASTE*******

can 1 name it Swamp Gas invisible comet non until it gets a name. Again ATS if anyone can help 1 it will be appreciated. It is wild to see them near SOL like that.

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Update comet/asteroid still there in C3 Lasco. But is has NONAME?

I believe you are referring to Mercury.

ETA:


stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

This should place Mercury in the FOV of SOHO.

reply to post by DenyObfuscation


No its not Mercury for that is on the right this object comes in around the 4th of this month 545 time approx235degrees from the South im tryng to capture image now thanks for trying though

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Update comet/asteroid still there in C3 Lasco. But is has NONAME?

Sungrazing comets are found in Lasco images all the time:
sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil...
Relax.

reply to post by ngchunter


Im am totally relaxed just fixing the images of it sling shoting off other objects energy ? And thanks for stopping thru nghunter, have you located its name or when it was spoken of?

The specks you are seeing are within the imaging device. This is quite obvious if you run a slideshow, they remain in exactly the same locations.

Yes, that seems to have been a comet in the C3 images on the 4th.

take a look at these pics and follow the instructions on accessing Lasco3 movie to see..

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by ngchunter

 

just fixing the images of it sling shoting off other objects energy ?

What are you talking about? You're going to have to be more specific and label specifically what it is you're talking about on an actual image if you want me to comment on it.

And thanks for stopping thru nghunter, have you located its name or when it was spoken of?

A couple of comets were mentioned in the above list, one of which was discovered on the 4th. No they aren't typically "named" in the traditional comet way unless it's a major comet (they're simply assigned a number later on by discovery order). There's simply too many (most of which are short-lived) and they'd clog up the works if they all were named alongside major comets.

reply to post by Ophiuchus 13


You're labeling a variety of stars and camera noise in your boxes. You're going to have to be more specific about which "speck" it is you think is the comet.

reply to post by ngchunter




Thanks again 1 was just wondering about them not being mentioned not to mention SOL surface images. Things is 1 understands EA*RTH has to follow guidelines so am not to FORCE WILL energy on any just place GEMS for many to polish if possible. Thanks again for stopping thru and taking time I will deeper check out the posted link.

NAMASTE*******

Jan 04 2013 01:24:47 Dae-Am Yi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential comet:
Images: C3; 1024x1024 images.
Kreutz group comet.
2211 319 765
2220 319 763
2229 320 762
2245 320 760
--Dae-Am Yi

Jan 04 2013 02:02:41 Zhijian Xu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential comet:
Images: C3; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
20130104
Kreutz group comet.
0530 334 669
0542 335 667
0608 337 663
--Zhijian Xu

Jan 04 2013 02:06:05 Krzysztof Kida
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential comet:
Images: C3; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
20130104
Kreutz group comet.
0530 333 669
0542 334 667
0608 336 663
--Krzysztof Kida

Jan 04 2013 02:08:28 Krzysztof Kida
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Retracting my claim of:
20130104 02:06:05
--Krzysztof Kida

Jan 04 2013 02:14:41 Hanjie Tan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential comet:
Images: C3; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
20130104
Kreutz group comet.
0530 336 720
0542 335 718
0608 339 714
--Hanjie Tan

Jan 04 2013 02:15:02 Michal Kusiak
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Confirming comet of:
Images: C3; 20130104 02:02:41
Kreutz group comet.
--Michal Kusiak

Jan 04 2013 02:16:15 Masanori Uchina
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential comet:
Images: C3; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
2013/1/4
Kreutz group comet.
0530 333 668
0542 335 660
0608 290 651
--Masanori Uchina

Jan 04 2013 02:16:53 Masanori Uchina
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Correction:
Images: C3; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
2013/1/4
Kreutz group comet.
0530 333 668
0542 335 666
0608 290 651
--Masanori Uchina

Jan 04 2013 02:19:12 Masanori Uchina
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Retracting my claim of:
Images: C3; 2013/1/4 02:16:15
Kreutz group comet.
--Masanori Uchina

Jan 04 2013 02:31:28 Hanjie Tan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Retracting my claim of:
20130104 02:14:41
--Hanjie Tan

Jan 04 2013 03:30:40 Masanori Uchina
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential comet:
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
2013/1/4
Kreutz group comet.
0712 6 883
0724 13 872
0736 20 867
--Masanori Uchina

Jan 04 2013 03:58:34 Masanori Uchina
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further to my post of...
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
2013/1/4 03:30:40
Kreutz group comet.
0748 28 861
--Masanori Uchina

Jan 04 2013 07:21:38 Daniel Aaron
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential comet:
Images: C3; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
13/1/4
Kreutz group comet.
5:42 334 667
6:08 336 662
6:18 337 661
6:30 339 659
--Daniel Aaron

Jan 04 2013 11:59:29 Zhijian Xu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Known comet now entering:
Images: C2; 1024x1024 images.
(0,0) Upper Left.
20130104
Kreutz group comet.
1624 61 783
--Zhijian Xu

Jan 04 2013 12:04:57 Krzysztof Kida

accepted

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13

Originally posted by 0mage
theyre going to say it is just artifacts of the image rendering process.

but how they seem close to surface?

Originally posted by TheDoctor46
Agreed with the above. The comet one has been pulled, there probably photoshopping it as we speak

I may have linked them wrong but if you pick the dates 2013-01-01 to 2013-01-14 you can see the comet in Lasco. Thank you both for taking a look.

edit on 1/14/13 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)

Do you think this plane is close to the Moon



Now why does it look close to the Moon.

Or how about this one do you think the ISS is close to the Sun.

www.spaceweather.com...

I love some of the comments made by the ufo believers on here, and because they are so obsessed by the subject common sense goes right out the window.

So do you want to explain why you think those are objects close to the sun and not artifacts

It's like other posts on here when a small white dot will cross the field of view in a Apollo/Shuttle/ISS video and someone will make the claim is traveling at speed x , how can they work that out YOU cant.

Seriously people on here need to think more why things could happen and not blame everything on conspiracies.

They are called "dark pixels" and do not resemble "objects".

What makes you think this is anything else but darker regions / compression artifacts ?

Because that's what they are.