It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What is the reason for French and English involvement in Mali?

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 09:51 AM
link   
Well the French and English have gone back to their imperialistic ways.They are claiming to be fighting terrorism.
But we know better.The real war is about dominating the African continent and stealing resources.

What resource is there in Mali you may ask?Well I will tell you.SAND they wish to sieze control of this valuable and much needed resource.After all without Sand in their knickers there would be less to whine about.

The rebel forces have already reported.That French planes have been targeted the civilian population.They have reported this before.We all know they speak only the truth!!

The reports on involvement state that this is against terrorism.We here all know this is a falsehood.The Jihadist
in Mali only want to protect the people.They have no other agenda and love us all. As Jihadist are a peaceful people.

End/Sarcasm




posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:02 AM
link   
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


Self-censorship. Nothing inappropriate, but my opinion on the matter is too unweighted at this time.

Like the quote in your member's box.
edit on 14-1-2013 by Kovenov because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:04 AM
link   
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


you sound really peeved, come over and play in the sandpit too if you like, i know the US govt hates to miss out on the fighting - turn up fashionably late like in the old days if you like.

sorry about trading like for like there, i have some news to catch up on clearly, when you start a serious thread on this i will join in with some serious comment




posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:05 AM
link   
The U.S. is part of the invasion as well, don't forget.



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty

What resource is there in Mali you may ask?Well I will tell you.SAND they wish to sieze control of this valuable and much needed resource.After all without Sand in their knickers there would be less to whine about.


I see what you did there. Well as far as I can translate what you've written I see what you did there. I think.

But no, it's gold and uranium.

Hope this helps.



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:13 AM
link   
reply to post by khimbar
 


nope, they are definately not in it for the uranium, the annunaki dont need it to repair their atmosphere. dont you read anything?



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by khimbar

Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty

What resource is there in Mali you may ask?Well I will tell you.SAND they wish to sieze control of this valuable and much needed resource.After all without Sand in their knickers there would be less to whine about.


I see what you did there. Well as far as I can translate what you've written I see what you did there. I think.

But no, it's gold and uranium.

Hope this helps.


The post was sarcasm.But I will concede to your point on Gold.I checked Wiki on Mali's resources.They only mentioned Gold and Water.But it could be outdated so I gave you a star.



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:29 AM
link   
reply to post by skalla
 





you sound really peeved, come over and play in the sandpit too if you like, i know the US govt hates to miss out on the fighting - turn up fashionably late like in the old days if you like.


I love it ........hold of to join a war and dont jump right in to make a rash decision =bad guy
be the first to strike =bad guy

Its awesome to be in no win situations........must be nice where you are on that high and mighty horse....

Its also awesome how the US is getting blamed already in this thread for this also......

And the french? I thought they didnt want to have anything to do with the war on terror because it didnt concern them.......

Guess that finally changed.......like everyone said it would
edit on 14-1-2013 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:35 AM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


i'm certain you understand sarcasm, tell you what, here's a deal your govt could cut with the uk and france - your military has some great toys and we all love to play, so if you keep piers morgan and allow french fries to remain as such i'm sure they will let you join in.



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:48 AM
link   
It's mostly about protecting the uranium mines that supply Areva's nuke plants and others.
Nuclear fuel is a very lucrative business (even more if you control the supply).

Then, those terrorists are getting too close to these installations, with their nasty habit of abducting their employees.

And then, it's about making the place uncomfortable for them so they decide to go fight on another theatre.
Something like lybia, egypt, syria. places that have been offered to them on a golden plate, so that they let the big boys rape the lands where the goods are.

For them, those sunni djihadists should be fighting the other way, closer to their ennemy, the chiite Iran.
We'll even give them free weapons if they do so. Don't follow the plan and it's drones next.



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 10:52 AM
link   
The reality is we have to start thinning out the muslums and this sounds like a pretty simple place to start. soon they will be in every country trying to take over so the more we thin them out the better.



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 11:11 AM
link   
I think the UK's only involvement is supplying the French with 2, c-17 transport air craft. But apparently one of them broke down on the runway.



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by skalla
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


i'm certain you understand sarcasm, tell you what, here's a deal your govt could cut with the uk and france - your military has some great toys and we all love to play, so if you keep piers morgan and allow french fries to remain as such i'm sure they will let you join in.



Do we have to keep morgan? or is that negotiable? lol star for you



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 11:27 AM
link   
reply to post by ManBehindTheMask
 


sorry but i dont represent the uk govt, just stirring the pot



edit: but really, he's your's now, nothing personal but we've had like 40 years of him over here, take pity on us
edit on 14-1-2013 by skalla because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 11:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by skalla
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


you sound really peeved, come over and play in the sandpit too if you like, i know the US govt hates to miss out on the fighting - turn up fashionably late like in the old days if you like.

sorry about trading like for like there, i have some news to catch up on clearly, when you start a serious thread on this i will join in with some serious comment



Not peeved just enjoying the hypocrisy of it all with SARCASM



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


fair enough Dude

in a general sense though, i cant help but feel from seeing recent post here on ATS that some US posters take it very personally when the foreign policy, habits/faults of the rulers of the US (yadda yadda) are criticised - this is a conspiracy website and these are not attacks on the US land or people, they are entirely separate and if they aint discussed here, then where? it really aint personal and we all have the right to debate what goes on in relation to other countries.

i'm a brit, i have had and have plenty of american friends, and i dont think that they are in charge of your army/president/ foreign policy or whatever or to blame for mine or others disagreements with them when they occur... just like they dont think i am responsible for the queen, the british empire, maggie thatcher, tony blair or whatever. feel free to take a pop at them, i'll more than likely join in



edit on 14-1-2013 by skalla because: clarity


so have a white russian and enjoy your rug, man - it really holds the room together
edit on 14-1-2013 by skalla because: dudeism



posted on Jan, 14 2013 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by skalla
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


fair enough Dude

in a general sense though, i cant help but feel from seeing recent post here on ATS that some US posters take it very personally when the foreign policy, habits/faults of the rulers of the US (yadda yadda) are criticised - this is a conspiracy website and these are not attacks on the US land or people, they are entirely separate and if they aint discussed here, then where? it really aint personal and we all have the right to debate what goes on in relation to other countries.

i'm a brit, i have had and have plenty of american friends, and i dont think that they are in charge of your army/president/ foreign policy or whatever or to blame for mine or others disagreements with them when they occur... just like they dont think i am responsible for the queen, the british empire, maggie thatcher, tony blair or whatever. feel free to take a pop at them, i'll more than likely join in



edit on 14-1-2013 by skalla because: clarity


so have a white russian and enjoy your rug, man - it really holds the room together
edit on 14-1-2013 by skalla because: dudeism


Thanks

" I guess that's the way the whole durned human comedy keeps perpetuatin' itself"

The Stranger (Sam Elliot)

edit on 14-1-2013 by rockymcgilicutty because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join