German activists start campaign to destroy surveillance cameras, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 31 times


reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 04:29 PM by cetaphobic
reply to post by Rikku



I don't get people's opposition to the government tapping telephones and spying on our internet connections. They're just keeping us safe from piracy and child pornography.


reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 05:25 PM by Panic2k11
reply to post by IvanAstikov



I think surveillance cameras are evil and I support the 2nd amendment that citizens need guns to be protected from an oppressive government.

In relations to the cameras I wouldn't see much of a problem if all feeds were public domains and freely accessible without delays and the public could also add their own cameras to the network with the same freedoms that the authorities enjoy.


reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 06:46 PM by jaynkeel
reply to post by PsykoOps



Well the camera systems that can follow you all over town, yes I would consider that stalking, the business that has a camera mounted in a public place doesn't track you all around town now does it? Different scenario is it not?


reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 07:49 PM by sweord
reply to post by Rikku





i dont care because i'm not a criminal and i'm not doing anything wrong.


...yet...laws change.
the jews werent doing anything illegal either...until it became illegal to be a jew.

of course, by then, it was too late because of people who think like you do.


reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 07:59 PM by Panic2k11
reply to post by jaynkeel



Its a matter of perception, the cameras are as dumb as those that operate them. Consider for instance what you see in movies that the xpto organization can pull up all camera streams at they own will (something that is perfectly technologically possible) now add to that the face recognition programs etc and you do have a stalker capability.

I think that cameras in public places are no by themselves an issue, but the expectation that those with access to the data will act "always" in the interest of all individuals (not as a mass). See my other post about shared access to the data and opportunity to decide the placing of cameras.


reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 08:01 PM by oldmeatwad
Originally posted by Rikku
i don't care if the government is watching me walk home, listening to my phonecall's, or checking what what i look at online.
i dont care because i'm not a criminal and i'm not doing anything wrong.
if its an issue for you, maybe youre doing things you shouldn't be doing.


This sir is where you are wrong. You are doing something wrong at all times.

- If you are standing on a street corner staring at the sunset - YOU ARE LOITERING!
- If you go one mile over the posted speed limit regardless of the reason - YOU ARE SPEEDING!
- If you step onto the sidewalk in front of your home with an open beer - YOU ARE BREAKING THE OPEN CONTAINER LAW!
- If you step outside of the crosswalk painted lines in an intersection - YOU ARE JAYWALKING!

Do you see??? Do you get it?? You are ALWAYS breaking the law. That's how it it these days - its a revenue generator for most states and they will not give it up. And guess what . . . .They can see all of this activity on camera so you stand zero chance of saying it was an accident.

Its UNFAIR - its OPPRESSIVE and ITS NOT ACCIDENTAL. I will not attack you personally as you are entitled to your opinion. However, please check your local towns laws and ordinances and tell me if believe its possible for you to live one single day where you do not break the law. And remember - Intentional or not intentional, a broken law is just that and you can be punished for it.



reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 09:28 PM by votan
Originally posted by Rikku
i don't care if the government is watching me walk home, listening to my phonecall's, or checking what what i look at online.
i dont care because i'm not a criminal and i'm not doing anything wrong.
if its an issue for you, maybe youre doing things you shouldn't be doing.


We have cultivated slaves. I am speechless. You really do not get it and you need to actually read history not just to see the abuse by government but also how the views on the state and individuals have changed through out history and reasons for the changes. You are a living example of twits that allow governments to go on a rampage.


It has nothing to do whether you are doing any right or wrong. The point is that the government says you are not trust worthy and you need to be watched. That is an insult to anyone who is an honest person. Guilty until proven innocent and you never prove your innocence by being watched 24/7. As they watch you they can make you guilty of anything they want as pointed out by another poster.

How about one day you scream at your mate or your kids simply because you are having a bad day... then your local police man shows up because you showed signs that could escalate to domestic violence.

or maybe you forgot to feed your dog or cat one day because you got home so late..... you get slapped with animal cruelty. OH OH your dog took a dump when you werent' watching you get fined.

If you think that cannot happen then explain to me why a little toddler was fined for urinating in public. That is what happens when you have the government watching... toddlers get fined.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags